Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of the ergodic decomposition of stationary measures for the interpretation of probability

  • The Foundations Of Probability
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

De Finetti's representation theorem is a special case of the ergodic decomposition of stationary probability measures. The problems of the interpretation of probabilities centred around de Finetti's theorem are extended to this more general situation. The ergodic decomposition theorem has a physical background in the ergodic theory of dynamical systems. Thereby the interpretations of probabilities in the cases of de Finetti's theorem and its generalization and in ergodic theory are systematically connected to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Billingsley, P.: Ergodic Theory and Information, Wiley, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G.: Lectures on Analysis, vol. 2, Benjamin, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. and D. Freedman: ‘de Finetti's generalizations of exchangeability’, in R. Jeffrey (ed.), pp. 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: ‘La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 7 (1937), pp. 1–68. English translation in Kyburg and Smokler (eds.) Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: ‘Sur la condition d'équivalence partielle’, in Colloque consacré a la theorie des probabilités, vol. VI, pp. 5–18. (= Act. Sci. Ind 739), Hermann, Paris, 1938. English translation in R. Jeffrey (ed.), pp. 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: ‘Initial probabilities: a prerequisite for any valid induction’, Synthese 20 (1969), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: Probability, Induction and Statistics, wiley, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: Theory of Probability, vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.: ‘Invariants under mixing which generalize de Finetti's theorem’, Ann. Math. Stat. 33 (1962), 916–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: The Estimation of Probabilities. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenander, U. and M. Rosenblatt: Statistical Analysis of Stationary Time Series, Wiley, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: ‘Unknown probabilities, Bayesianism and de Finetti's representation theorem’, in R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VIII, pp. 325–341, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, E.: ‘On causality, statistics and probability’, Journal of Mathematics and Physics 17 (1934), 51–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K.: Lecture Notes on Ergodic Theory, Aarhus Universitet, Matematisk Institut, Aarhus, 1963 (mimeographed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.: (ed.) Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khinchin, A. I.: Mathematical Foundations of Statistical Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriloff, N. and N. Bogoliouboff: ‘La théorie générale de la mesure dans son application à l'étude des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non-linéaire’, Annals of Mathematics, 2nd ser. 38 (1937), 65–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: ‘Representation theorems of the de Finetti type for (partially) symmetric probability measures’, in R. Jeffrey (ed.), pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malament, D. and S. Zabell: ‘Why Gibbs averages work — the role of ergodic theory’, Philosophy of Science 47 (1980) 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, A.: Statistical Mechanics and the Foundations of Thermodynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 101, Springer, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: ‘Zur Operatorenmethode in der klassischen Mechanik’, Annals of Mathematics 33 (1932), 587–642. Reprinted in von Neumann, Collected Works, vol. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, D.: Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and Dynamical Systems, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R.: Lectures on Choquet's Theorem, Van Nostrand, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Plato, J.: ‘Epistemological problems of subjective probabilities’, Reports from the Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, No 2, 1980.

  • von Plato, J.: ‘Reductive relations in interpretations of probability’, Synthese 48 (1981), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D.: Thermodynamic Formalism, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryll-Nardzewski, C.: ‘On stationary sequences of random variables and the de Finetti's equivalence’, Colloquium Mathematicum 4 (1957), 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: Personelle und Statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit, 2 vols. Springer, Berlin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell, C.: ‘Ergodic theory in classical statistical mechanics’, in Caldirola (ed.), Ergodic Theories, pp. 21–56, Academic Press, New York and London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is an extended version of footnote 5 of von Plato (1981).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Von Plato, J. The significance of the ergodic decomposition of stationary measures for the interpretation of probability. Synthese 53, 419–432 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486158

Keywords

Navigation