Abstract
Toulmin’s (1958) model of argument was employed in the analysis of verbal protocols obtained during the solving of ill-structured problems. The participants were experts in the domain under study. For the analysis the Toulmin model was extended in order to enable description of lines of argument found in protocols as long as 10 paragraphs. Results included: (1) That while the protocol was comprised of a large number of specific arguments, the analysis provided for tracing a solver’s line of argument. (2) On occasion datum and backing were difficult to distinguish. (3) Warrants essentially were not stated, although substantial backing was provided. However, as perhaps would be expected, the Toulmin model did not provide for delineation of components of the problem-solving process. A second analysis assuming a “higher level” problem-solving structure and a “lower level” argument structure produced an integrated problem-solving – argumentation structure depicting how reasoning is used in relation to particular task goals. Finally, at a more general level, problem solving was considered as a classical rhetorical structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. T. H. Chi P. J. Feltovich R. Glaser (1981) ArticleTitle‘Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices’ Cognitive Science 5 121–125
T. C. Govier (1987) Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation Foris Providence, RI
F. H. Eemeren R. Grootendorst Particlevan F. Snoeck Henkemans (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
D. Hample (1977) ArticleTitle‘The Toulmin Model and the Syllogism’ Journal of the American Forensic Association 14 1–9
M. Means J. F. Voss (1990) ArticleTitle‘Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels’ Cognition and Instruction 4 IssueID2 139–178
A. Newell H. A. Simon (1972) Human Problem Solving Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
W. Reitman (1965) Cognition and Thought Wiley New York
H. A. Simon (1973) ArticleTitle‘The Structure of Ill-structured Problems’ Artificial Intelligence 4 181–201 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
S. E. Toulmin (1958) The Uses of Argument Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Tweney, R. D.: 1981, Confirmatory and disconfirmatory heuristics in Michael Faraday’s scientific research, paper presented at the twenty-second meeting of the Psychonomic Society
J. F. Voss R. Fincher-Kiefer J. Wiley L. N. Silfies (1993) ArticleTitle‘On the Processing of Arguments’ Argumentation 7 165–181 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00710663
J. F. Voss T. R. Greene T. A. Post B. C. Penner (1983a) ‘Problem Solving Skill in the Social Sciences’ G. H. Bower (Eds) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory NumberInSeriesVol. 17 Academic Press New York 165–213
J. F. Voss M. Means (1991) ArticleTitle‘Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation’ Learning and Instruction 1 337–350 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
J. F. Voss S. W. Tyler L. A. Yengo (1983b) Individual Differences in the Solving of Social Science Problems R. Dillon R. Schmeck (Eds) Individual Differences in Cognition Academic Press New York 205–232
J. F. Voss J. Wiley J. Kennet T. E. Schooler L. N. Silfies (1998) Representations of the Gulf Crisis as Derived from the U.S. Senate Debate D. A. Sylvan J. F. Voss (Eds) Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making Cambridge University Press Cambridge 279–302
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voss, J.F. Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems. Argumentation 19, 321–329 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4419-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4419-6