Skip to main content
Log in

Burgeoning skepticism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows that the resources mobilized by recent arguments against individualism in the philosophy of mind also suffice to construct a good argument against a Humean-style skepticism about our knowledge of extra-mental reality. The argument constructed, however, will not suffice to lay to rest the attacks of a truly global skeptic who rejects the idea that we usually know what our occurrent mental states are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BakerL. R.: 1986, ‘Just What Do We Have in Mind?’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy V, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • BakerL. R.: 1987, ‘Content by Courtesy’, The Journal of Philosophy 84, 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • BakerL. R.: 1987a, Saving Belief, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • BonjourL.: 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BruecknerA.: 1986, ‘Brains in a Vat’, The Journal of Philosophy 83, 148–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • BurgeT.: 1977, ‘Belief De Re’, The Journal of Philosophy 74, 338–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • BurgeT.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy IV, 73–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1982, ‘Other Bodies’, in Woodfield, 1982, pp. 97–120.

  • BurgeT.: 1983, ‘Two Thought Experiments Reviewed’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, 284–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • BurgeT.: 1988, ‘Individuation and Self-Knowledge’, The Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChisholmR.: 1957, Perceiving, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • DennettD. C.: 1987, Evolution, Error, and Intentionality’, in The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 287–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • FodorJ. A.: 1982, ‘Cognitive Science and the Twin-Earth Problem’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: unpub., ‘Narrow Content and Meaning Holism’.

  • FodorJ. A.: 1987, Psychosemantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoldmanA.: 1976, ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, The Journal of Philosophy 73, 771–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermottM.: 1986, ‘Narrow Content’, Australiasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 277–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1982, ‘The Structure of Content’, in Woodfield, 1982, pp. 201–58.

  • Pappas, G.: 1978, ‘Some Forms of Epistemological Skepticism’, in Pappas and Swain, 1978.

  • PappasG., and SwainM.: 1978, Essays on Knowledge and Justification, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • PutnamH.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • SellarsW.: 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1963a, ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, in Sellars, 1963, pp. 127–96.

  • Sellars, W.: 1963b, ‘Phenomenalism’, in Sellars, 1963, pp. 60–105.

  • Taylor, K.: unpub., ‘Narrow Content: Functionalism and the Mind-Body Problem’

  • WoodfieldA.: 1982, Thought and Object, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vries, W. Burgeoning skepticism. Erkenntnis 33, 141–164 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166330

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166330

Keywords

Navigation