Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ga\(\dot n\) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)na of VYĀPTI (1)

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Annabhaa. Tarkasa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) Edited with the author'sDīpikā and Govardhana'sNyāyabodhinī by Yashwant Vasudev Athalye and Mahadev Rajaram Bodas. Bombay Sanskrit Series 55. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, Tarasamkar (1945, 1946). The Five Provisional Definitions of Vyāpti',Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute 3 (1945): 67–89, 315–349; 4 (1946): 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, Tarasamkar (1970).The Nature of Vyāpti. Calcutta: Calcutta Sanskrit College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocheński, I. M. (1956).Formale Logik. Munchen: Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gageśa Upādhyāya. Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \). Edited with the Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) by Kāmākhyānātha Tarkavāgīśa, Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1884–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goekoop, C. (1967). The Logic of Invariable Concomitance in the Tattvacintā-ma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariram Shukla.Vyākhyā. A commentary on theTattvacintāma \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) irahasya. See Mathurānātha's Māthurī Pañcalak \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) a \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\) a \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\) ī.

  • Ingalls, Daniel H. H. (1951).Materials for the Study of Navya-Nyāya Logic. Harvard Oriental Series 40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaviraj, Gopinath (1961). Gleanings from the History and Bibliography of the Nyāya-Vaiśe\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \). Reprinted from the Saraswati Bhawan Series 3, 4, 5, and 7. Calcutta: Indian Studies, Past & Present.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Hidenori (1978). Muktāvalīdarpa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \). Studia Asiatica 3. Nagoya: Department of Indian Philosophy, University of Nagoya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheśa Chandra Nyāyaratna. Navyanyāya-Bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)āpradīpa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{h} \) orBrief Notes on the Modern Nyāya System of Philosophy and Its Technical Terms. Edited with the commentarySuprabhā and Bengali translation by K. Tarkacharya, Calcutta: Calcutta Sanskrit College, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathurānātha Tarkavāgīśa. Māthurī Pañcalak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)a\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) (K2). Edited with theVyākhyā of Hariram Shukla. Kashi Sanskrit Series 78. Benares: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathurānātha Tarkavāgīśa. Si\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)havyāghralak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} a\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) (K). Included in Vyāptipañcakarahasyam and Sinhavyāghralak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} a\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) by Mathurānātha Tarkavāgīśa, edited with Ga\(\dot n\)gānirjharidn\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) commentary and notes of Sivadatta Misra by Dhundhiraja Sastri. Kashi Sanskrit Series 64. Benares: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathurānātha Tarkavāgīśa.Tattvacintāma \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)irahasya (BI). Included in Ga\(\dot n\)geśa'sTattvacintāma \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)i. Mathurānātha Tarkavāgīśa.Vyāptipañcakarahasyam (K). See Mathurānātha'sSi \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\) havyāghralak \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)a\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)arahasyam.

  • Matilal, Bimal K. (1968).The Navya-nyāya Doctrine of Negation. Harvard Oriental series 46. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaka Yuko (1983). ‘Navyanyāya ni okeru Śābdabodha no Kōzōbunseki’ (A Structural Analysis of Śābdabodha in Navyanyāya), Sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) 5: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaka Yuko (1987). ‘The Definition ofVyāpti in Navyanyāya — its nature and construction with reference to Ga\(\dot n\)ngeśa and Raghunātha Śiroma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i’, Sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) 9: 47–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śaśadhara.Nyāyasiddhāntadīpa. Edited with the\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{T} \)ippana of Gu\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)aratnasūri by B. K. Matilal. L.D. Series 56. Ahmedabad: L.D. Institute, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Saileswar (1924).A Study of Mathurānātha's Rahasya. Wageningen.

  • Śivadatta Miśra. Ga\(\dot n\)ī. A commentary on theTattvacintāma \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)irahasya. See Mathurānātha'sSi \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\) havyāghralak \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)a\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)arahasyam.

  • Staal, J. F. (1958). ‘Means of Formalization in Indian and Western Logic’,Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Philosophy. Venice, pp. 221–227.

  • Tachikawa, Musashi (1981).The Structure of the World in Udayana's Realism. Studies of Classical India 4. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyabhushana, Satis Chandra (1970).A History of Indian Logic. Calcutta, 1978 (repr. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).

  • Viśvanātha Pañcānana.Nyāyasiddhāntamuktāvalī. Edited with the Kira\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) of Srī K\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)avallabhācārya by Narayancharan Shastri and Swetavaikuntha Shastri. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series 212. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Toshihiro (1988a, 1988b). ‘Delimitor (avacchedaka) in Navya-nyāya Philosophy (1), (2)’,The Journal of the Faculty of Letters, Nagoya University 102, Philosophy 34 (1988a): 31–44;Tokai-Bukkyo 33 (1988b): 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Toshihiro (1988c). ‘Describer (nirūpaka) in Navya-nyāya’,Annals of Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 69: 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Toshihiro (1988d). ‘Qualifier (viśe\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)) in Navya-nyāya Philosophy’,Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 37 (1): 500–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Toshihiro (1989). The Logical Validity of the Inferences in theSiddhān- talak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)aa Chapter of the Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)idīdhiti’, Sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)ā 11: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Toshihiro (1990).Invariable Concomitance in Navya-Nyāya. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Indian Philosophy, University of Nagoya, Japan

    Toshihiro Wada

Authors
  1. Toshihiro Wada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I wish to thank Charles Pain, University of California, Berkeley, for correcting my English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wada, T. Ga\(\dot n\) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)na of VYĀPTI (1). J Indian Philos 23, 273–294 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463134

Search

Navigation