Skip to main content
Log in

Peters' Non-Instrumental Justification of Education View Revisited: Contesting the Philosophy of Outcomes-based Education in South Africa

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I argue that Outcomes-basedEducation is conceptually trapped in aninstrumentally justifiable view of education. Icontend that the notion of Outcomes-basedEducation is incommensurable with anon-instrumental justification of educationview as explained by RS Peters (1998). Theprocess of specifying outcomes in educationaldiscourse lends itself to manipulation andcontrol and thereby makes the idea ofOutcomes-based Education educationallyimpoverished. In this article an argument ismade for education through rational reflectionand imagination which can complement anOutcomes-based Education system for the reasonthat it finds expression in a non-instrumentaljustifiable view of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capper, C. (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society. New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capper, C. & Jamison, M. (1993). Outcomes-based education re-examined: from structural functionalism to poststructuralism. School Management and Organisation, 7(4), 427–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, R. (1998). Objectivity and education. In P. Hirst & P. White (Eds), Philosophy of education: major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 224–233). Volume II Education and Human Being. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1996). Contemporary philosophy of science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1992). Interview: the 1920s, 1930s, and the present: national socialism, German history and German culture. In D. Misgeld & G. Nicholson (Eds), L. Schimdt & M. Reuss (trans.), On education, poetry and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 136–152). Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (1998). Higher education and relevance in the 21st century, Paper Presented at UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, October, pp. 1–65.

  • Gutman, A. (1998). Undemocratic education. In P. Hirst & P. White (Eds), Philosophy of education: major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 28–43). Volume III Society and Education. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. (1993). Postmodernism and organisational analysis: an overview. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds), Postmodernism and organizations (pp. 1–24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, M. (1998). Research methods as a situated response: towards a First Nations' methodology. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, A. (1997). Pedagogy, democracy and feminism: rethinking the public sphere. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janse van Rensburg, J. & Potlane, V. (1998). Outcomes-based teaching and learning: concepts and essentials. In F. Pretorius (Ed.), Outcomes-based education in South Africa (pp. 27–42). Johannesburg: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D. (1998). Postmodernism: a critical typology. Politics and Society, 26(1), 95–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerdeman, D. (1998). Hermeneutics and education: understanding, control and agency. Educational Theory, 48(2), 241–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1998). Critical pedagogy and its complicities: a praxis of stuck places. Educational Theory, 48(4), 487–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the virtues. Illinois: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. (1998). Education: the engagement and its frustration. In P. Hirst & P.White (Eds), Philosophy of education: major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 284–310). Volume I Philosophy and Education. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1998). Cultivating imagination. In P. Hirst & P. White (Eds), Philosophy of education: major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 234–254). Volume II Education and Human Being. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. (1998). The justification of education. In P. Hirst & P. White (Eds), Philosophy of education: major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 207–230). Volume I Philosophy and Education. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. & Reynolds, W. (Eds) (1992). Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius, F. (Ed.) (1998). Outcomes-based education in South Africa. Johannesburg: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. & Cavener, L. (1994). Outcomes-based education and curriculum change: advocacy, practice and critique. Educational Change, 9(4), 326–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solway, D. (1999). Outcomes based education: a referential tragedy. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 1, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. (1994). Outcomes-based education: critical issues and answers. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, P. & Wilkinson, A. (1998). Understanding the theoretical assumptions of outcomesbased education as a condition for meaningful implementation. South African Journal of Education, 18(4), 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: philosophical papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, N. & Mothata, M. (1998). Developments in South African education since 1994. In F. Pretorius (Ed.), Outcomes-based education in South Africa (pp. 1–12). Johannesburg: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waghid, Y. Peters' Non-Instrumental Justification of Education View Revisited: Contesting the Philosophy of Outcomes-based Education in South Africa. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22, 245–265 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022873405630

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022873405630

Navigation