Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thank you for your lovely card: ethical considerations in responding to bereaved parents invited in error to participate in childhood cancer survivorship research

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research exploring the needs of families of childhood cancer survivors is critical to improving the experiences of future families faced by this disease. However, there are numerous challenges in conducting research with this unique population, including a relatively high mortality rate. In recognition that research with cancer survivors is a relational activity, this article presents a series of cases of parents bereaved by childhood cancer who unintentionally received invitations to participate in survivorship research. We explore six ethical considerations, and compare our experiences with that described previously. Our considerations include the sharing of confidential information with external parties to confirm past patients’ vital status and appropriate researcher responses to bereaved parents. The management of researchers’ emotional safety when working with illness populations and the fact that study invitations can elicit grief responses in non-bereaved families are discussed. To conclude, we argue for the benefits of inviting bereaved parents whose children died after treatment completion in survivorship research. Such parents’ early survivorship experiences will otherwise be systemically neglected. We argue that discussing complex cases can assist researchers to protect participants’ and researchers’ emotional well-being. We hope to contribute to the dearth of discussion about research operating procedures to address these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2010. Moving House. Australian social trends, Cat. no. 4102.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.

  • Bellavance, E.C., and H. Alexander. 2012. Ethical considerations in clinical research. Annals of Surgical Oncology 19(2): 355–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks, M., Y. Chapman, and K. Francis. 2008. Memoing in qualitative research probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing 13(1): 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowtell, E.C., S.M. Sawyer, R.A. Aroni, J.B. Green, and R.E. Duncan. 2013. “Should I Send a Condolence Card?” promoting emotional safety in qualitative health research through reflexivity and ethical mindfulness. Qualitative Inquiry 19(9): 652–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, N.M., D. Berlin-Romalis, V. Jovcevska, and M. Barrera. 2008. Bereaved parents’ perspectives on their needs. Palliative and Supportive Care 6(01): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, R.F., A.L. Barratt, S. Crossing, P.N. Butow, S. Hanson, and M.H. Tattersall. 2011. Consumer input into research: The Australian Cancer Trials website. Health Research Policy and Systems 9(1): 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V., E.L. James, S. Kippen, and P. Liamputtong. 2006. Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research 16(6): 853–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V., E.L. James, S. Kippen, and P. Liamputtong. 2008. Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research 18(1): 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R.E., S.E. Drew, J. Hodgson, and S.M. Sawyer. 2009. Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people. Social Science and Medicine 69(11): 1691–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N., C.E. Wakefield, J.K. McLoone, and R.J. Cohn. 2013. Eight diagnoses later, they finally got it right: Familial diagnostic experiences in paediatric oncology. Australian New Zealand Children’s Haematology and Oncology Group (ANZCHOG), Annual Scientific Meeting, Melbourne.

  • Ewing, G., M. Rogers, S. Barclay, J. McCabe, A. Martin, and C. Todd. 2004. Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: Why is it so difficult? Palliative Medicine 18(5): 452–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. 2004. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, M.M., K.K. Ness, J.G. Gurney, D.A. Mulrooney, W. Chemaitilly, K.R. Krull, D.M. Green, G.T. Armstrong, K.A. Nottage, and K.E. Jones. 2013. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer outcomes among adult survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 309(22): 2371–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., and J.M. Clarke. 2003. Collecting sensitive data: The impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research 13(3): 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, L. 2006. Bereavement care for families part 2: Evaluation of a paediatric follow-up programme. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 12(10): 484–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffman, J., I.J. Higginson, S. Hall, J. Riley, P. McCrone, and B. Gomes. 2012. Bereaved relatives’ views about participating in cancer research. Palliative Medicine 26(4): 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustyk, M., N. Chawla, R. Nolan, and G. Marlatt. 2009. Mindfulness meditation research: Issues of participant screening, safety procedures, and researcher training. Advances in mind–body medicine 24(1): 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, M.E., S. Liben, F.A. Carnevale, J.E. Rennick, S.L. Wolf, D. Meloche, and S.R. Cohen. 2005. Parental perspectives on hospital staff members’ acts of kindness and commemoration after a child’s death. Pediatrics 116(4): 884–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnab, A.J., T. Northway, K. Ryall, D. Scott, and G. Straw. 2003. Death and bereavement in a paediatric intensive care unit: Parental perceptions of staff support. Paediatrics and Child Health 8(6): 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, A.C., Q. Liu, J.P. Neglia, K. Wasilewski, W. Leisenring, G.T. Armstrong, L.L. Robison, and Y. Yasui. 2008. Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: The childhood cancer survivor study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100(19): 1368–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, S. 2011. The Emperor of all Maladies: A Biography of Cancer: Scribner.

  • National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. 2014. The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and the Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

  • Therapeutic Goods Administration. 2000. Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95). Department of Health and Aged Care. http://www.tga.gov.au/pdf/euguide/ich13595an.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Oeffinger, K.C., A.C. Mertens, C.A. Sklar, T. Kawashima, M.M. Hudson, A.T. Meadows, D.L. Friedman, N. Marina, W. Hobbie, N.S. Kadan-Lottick, C.L. Schwartz, W. Leisenring, and L.L. Robison. 2006. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 355(15): 1572–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, D., A. Hee, and R. Aroni. 1999. Being ‘real’ in suicide prevention evaluation: The role of the ethnographer’s emotions under traumatic conditions. Australian Journal of Primary Health 5(3): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G.B., and S.F. Rallis. 2010. Everyday ethics: Reflections on practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23(4): 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Cline, M., J. Gerson, P. Bright, C. S. Lee, and R. M. Nelson. (2011). Ethical considerations in conducting pediatric research. In Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, 219–244. Springer.

  • Sansom-Daly, U.M., and C.E. Wakefield. 2013. Distress and adjustment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: An empirical and conceptual review. Translational Pediatrics 2(4): 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwint, J.R., and M.E. Nellis. 2005. Deaths of pediatric patients: Relevance to their medical home, an urban primary care clinic. Pediatrics 115(1): 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixsmith, J., M. Boneham, and J.E. Goldring. 2003. Accessing the community: Gaining insider perspectives from the outside. Qualitative Health Research 13(4): 578–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, C.E., P. Butow, C.A. Fleming, G. Daniel, and R.J. Cohn. 2012. Family information needs at childhood cancer treatment completion. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 58(4): 621–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, C. E., D. Drew, S. J. Ellis, E. L. Doolan, J. K. McLoone, and R. J. Cohn. (2014). Grandparents of children with cancer: A controlled study of distress, support, and barriers to care. Psycho-Oncology.

  • Wakefield, C.E., J. McLoone, B. Goodenough, K. Lenthen, D.R. Cairns, and R.J. Cohn. 2010. The psychosocial impact of completing childhood cancer treatment: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 35(3): 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.L., R.J. Cohn, K.A. Johnson, and L.J. Ashton. 2009. Tracing survivors of childhood cancer in Australia. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 52(4): 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, N., M. Markovic, and L. Manderson. 2007. Researcher saturation: The impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qualitative Health Research 17(10): 1392–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contribution of Alison Young (Researcher; Sydney Children’s Hospital). This study was funded by the Kids Cancer Alliance, which is supported by a translational research grant from the Cancer Institute of NSW. Claire Wakefield is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1067501) and an Early Career Development fellowship from the Cancer Institute of NSW (ID: 11/ECF/3-43). The Behavioural Sciences Unit is supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire E. Wakefield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wakefield, C.E., McLoone, J.K., Donovan, L.A. et al. Thank you for your lovely card: ethical considerations in responding to bereaved parents invited in error to participate in childhood cancer survivorship research. Med Health Care and Philos 18, 113–119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9587-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9587-4

Keywords

Navigation