Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:14:04.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Review of Mathematics and Scientific Representation - Christopher Pincock, Mathematics and Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012), xiv+330 pp., $65.00 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Friedman, Milton. 2001. The Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hodes, Harold. 1984. “Logicism and the Ontological Commitments of Arithmetic.” Journal of Philosophy 81 (3): 123–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1970. “How to Define Theoretical Terms.” Journal of Philosophy 67:427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przelecki, Marian. 1969. The Logic of Empirical Theories. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed. 1963. The Library of Living Philosophers. Vol. 11, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1993. “Mathematics and Indispensability.” Philosophical Review 102 (1): 3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar