Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Westin and Nilstun

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beauchamp T, Childress J (1979) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (1st ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp T, Childress J (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Downie RS, Calman KC (1987) Health Respect: Ethics in Health Care. Faber: London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Westin L, Nilstun T (2006) Principles help to analyse but often give no solution—secondary prevention after a cardiac event. Health Care Analysis 14(2).

  5. Winkler ER (1993), From Kantianism to Contextualism: the rise and fall of paradigm theory in bioethics. In: Winkler ER, Coombs JR (eds) Applied Ethics: A Reader. Blackwell Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of English Communications and Philosophy, Cardiff University, Humanities Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, UK

    Simon Waltho

Authors
  1. Simon Waltho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Waltho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waltho, S. Response to Westin and Nilstun. Health Care Anal 14, 119–122 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0019-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0019-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation