Abstract
This article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of arguments based on appeals to expertise. The intersection of two areas is explored: (i) the traditional argumentum ad verecundiam (literally, “appeal to modesty,” but characteristically the appeal to the authority of expert judgment) in informal logic, and (ii) the uses of expert systems in artificial intelligence. The article identifies a model of practical reasoning that underlies the logic of expert systems and the model of argument appropriate for the informal logic of the argumentum ad verecundiam.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bratko, I.: 1986, Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
Clancey, W. J.: 1979, ‘Tutoring Rules for Guiding a Case Method Dialogue,’ International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 11, 25–49.
Clements, C. D. and J. R. Ciccone: 1984, ‘Ethics and Expert Witnesses,’ Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 12, 127–136.
Dreyfus, H. and S. Dreyfus: 1986, ‘Why Expert Systems Do Not Exhibit Expertise,’ IEEE Expert 1, 86–90.
Eliot, L. B.: 1986, ‘Analogical Problem-Solving and Expert Systems,’ IEEE Expert 1, no. 2, 17–26.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Intelliware: 1986, Experteach (software and manual), Intelligence Ware, Inc., Los Angeles.
Rescher, N.: 1976, Plausible Reasoning, Van Gorcum, Assen-Amsterdam.
Salmon, W.: 1963, Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Schank, R. G.: 1982, Dynamic Memory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shoesmith, D. and T. Smiley: 1980, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Van Ditmarsch, H. P.: 1986, ‘Applications of Abstraction in Argumentation,’ Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches, ed. F. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard, Dordrecht, Foris Publications, 1987, 162–169.
Von Wright, G. H.: 1983, Practical Reason, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Walton, D.: 1985, Arguer's Position, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut and London, England.
Walton, D.: 1987, Informal Fallacies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Walton, D. and L. Batten: 1984, ‘Games, Graphs and Circular Arguments,’ Logique et Analyse 106, 133–164.
Wilensky, R.: 1983, Planning and Understanding: A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1974, ‘Argumentum Ad Verecundiam,’ Philosophy and Rhetoric 7, 135–153.
Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1982, Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walton, D.N. Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation. Argumentation 3, 59–73 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116417
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116417