Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Religiosity on Ethical Judgments

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between religiosity and ethical behavior at work has remained elusive. In fact, inconsistent results in observed magnitudes and direction led Hood et al. (The psychology of religion: An empirical approach, 1996) to describe the relationship between religiosity and ethics as “something of a roller coaster ride.” Weaver and Agle (Acad Manage Rev 27(1):77–97, 2002) utilizing social structural versions of symbolic interactionism theory reasoned that we should not expect religion to affect ethical outcomes for all religious individuals; rather, such a relationship likely depends on specific religious attitudes including religious motivation orientation (intrinsic RMO vs. extrinsic RMO), perceived sacred qualities of work (job sanctification), and views of God (VOG, loving vs. punishing). We examined the effects of these three religious attitudes on participants’ judgments of 29 ethically questionable vignettes. Consistent with symbolic interactionism theory, intrinsic RMO and having a loving view of God were both negatively related to endorsing ethically questionable vignettes, whereas extrinsic RMO was positively related to endorsing the vignettes. Unexpectedly, job sanctification was positively related to endorsing the vignettes. However, both intrinsic and extrinsic RMO moderated this relationship such that sanctifying one’s job was related to ethical judgments only for those who were: (a) low in intrinsic RMO or (b) high in extrinsic RMO. We reasoned based on symbolic interactionism theory that intrinsically motivated participants, in contrast to extrinsically motivated participants, may have utilized their religious beliefs as a guiding framework in making ethical judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, I. P. (1989). Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimhall, A. S., & Butler, M. H. (2007). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic religious motivation and the marital relationship. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychological Quarterly, 43, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, K. R., Hageman, A., & Isle, D. B. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and subjective well-being: The unique contribution of intrinsic religious motivation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatters, L. M., & Taylor, R. J. (1989). Age differences in religious participation among black adults. Journal of Gerontology, 44, S183–S184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, L. L., Johnson, R. C., Bowers, J. K., Darvill, T. J., & Danko, G. P. (1990). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity as related to conscience, adjustment, and altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(4), 397–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. W., & Dawson, L. E. (1996). Personal religiousness and ethical judgments: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, J. L., & Lizardo, O. (2009). A power-control theory of gender and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, P. D. (2009). Workplace spirituality and business ethics: Insights from an Eastern spiritual tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronan, T. P., Leonard, L. N. K., & Kreie, J. (2005). An empirical validation of perceived importance and behavior intention in IT ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, L. S. (2003). Spirituality and religion: Some perspectives. In O. F. Williams (Ed.), Business religion and spirituality: A new synthesis. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, L. G., Elliott, H., Florence, E., & DuFrene, D. D. (1997). The ethical issues rating scale: An instrument for measuring ethical orientation of college students toward various business practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. C., & Caddell, D. P. (1994). Religion and the meaning of work. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 3, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehler, G. E., & Welsh, M. A. (2003). The experience of work: Spirituality and the new workplace. In R. Giacalone & C. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Right from wrong: The influence of spirituality on perceptions of unethical business activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1985). The structure of self-conception: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1392–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr., Spilka, B., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1995). Workers religious beliefs may get new attention. The Wall Street Journal, August 22.

  • Kennedy, R. G. (2003). Spirituality and the Christian manager. In O. F. Williams (Ed.), Business religion and spirituality: A new synthesis. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. E. (2008). (Dis)Missing the obvious: Will mainstream management research ever take religion seriously? Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. E., & Crowther, M. R. (2004). The measurement of religiosity and spirituality: Examples and issues from psychology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (1994). Aging and god. Binghamton: The Haworth Pastoral Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodinsky, R. W., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2008). Workplace values and outcomes: Exploring personal, organizational, and interactive workplace spirituality. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (2004). Religious intensity, evangelical Christianity, and business ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, A., Carels, R. A., Pargament, K. I., Wachholtz, A., Leeper, L. E., Kaplar, M., et al. (2005a). The sanctification of the body and behavioral health patterns of college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(3), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Jewell, T., Magyar, G., & Tarakeshwar, N. (2005b). A higher purpose: The sanctification of strivings in a community sample. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Jewell, T., Swank, A. B., Scott, E., Emery, E., et al. (1999). Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(3), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, M. J., & Kahoe, R. D. (1984). Psychology of religion: Religion and individual lives. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozmet, S. (1992). Protestants: The birth of a revolution. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah, K. P., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2008). Ethics and religion: An empirical test of a multidimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (1999). Spirituality: Discovering and conserving the sacred. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2005). Sacred matters: Sanctification as a vital topic for the psychology of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek, P. J. (1992). Demographic and related differences in ethical views among small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2009). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association of Psychological Science, San Francisco.

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. R., & Serpe, T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research examples. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality roles and social behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, J., McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2005). Psychometric and rationalization accounts of the religion-forgiveness discrepancy. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G., Jones, M. N., Wuensch, K. L., Aziz, S., & Cope, J. G. (2008). Sanctifying work: Effects on satisfaction, commitment, and intent to leave. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18, 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberley, D. W. (1984). Socioeconomic deprivation and religious salience: A cognitive behavioral approach. Sociological Quarterly, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, H. M. (2008). Religiousness, love of money, and ethical attitudes of Malaysian evangelical Christians in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan G. Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, A.G., Smither, J.W. & DeBode, J. The Effects of Religiosity on Ethical Judgments. J Bus Ethics 106, 437–452 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1009-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1009-4

Keywords

Navigation