Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why Does Energy-Saving Behavior Rise and Fall? A Study on Consumer Face Consciousness in the Chinese Context

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the effect of an individual difference variable that reflects the extent to which one desires positive evaluations from others—that is, face consciousness on consumer energy-saving behavior—as well as the mechanism through which the effect occurs and conditions under which it varies. Drawing upon the means-end theory of lifestyles, we propose that face consciousness increases a status-seeking lifestyle and thus decreases energy-saving behavior. Moreover, the negative relationship between status-seeking lifestyle and energy-saving behavior is contingent upon a perceived seriousness of environmental problems and perceived environmental responsibility, such that the indirect and negative effect of such face consciousness is stronger for consumers who perceive less serious environmental problems and less environmental responsibility. Results from an experimental study and a field study using samples of Chinese consumers provide consistent evidence for the hypothesized model. Theoretical and practical implications for energy-saving behavior are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, A. (1929). Problems of neurosis: A book of case histories. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R., & Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children’s materialism: The role of peer relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Su, C. (2003). Face consciousness and risk aversion: Do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychology & Marketing, 20(8), 733–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsø, K., Scholderer, J., & Grunert, K. G. (2004). Closing the gap between values and behavior—A means–End theory of lifestyle. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Comprehensive Social Survey. (2010). Chinese National Survey Data Archive. Retrieved from http://cnsda.ruc.edu.cn/index.php?r=projects/view&id=15553986.

  • Choo, S., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2004). What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(3), 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coreil, J., Levin, J. S., & Jaco, E. G. (1985). Life style-an emergent concept in the sociomedical sciences. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 9(4), 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2018). Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland. Journal of Business Research, 86(5), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S. (1983). Interactionism: A personality model, but not yet a theory. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, A. Z., Cai, T., Deng, T. X., & Li, X. (2016). Factors affecting non-green consumer behaviour: An exploratory study among Chinese consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(3), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B., & Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1583–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori, S., Kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52(1), 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, A., Francesco, A. M., & Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism-collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(1), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation: Exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 423–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi-Uehara, E., Nakatani, J., & Hirao, M. (2016). Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part I: Effect of environmental awareness and trust in environmental information on product choice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindra, G., Laroche, M., & Muller, T. (1994). The Canadian perspective consumer behaviour. Ontario: International Thomson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulviwat, S., Bruner, I. I., G. C., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2009). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Mano, H. (2014). Beyond simple innovativeness: A hierarchical continuum and thinking and feeling processing modes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(4), 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Zhang, X. A., & Sun, G. (2015). Effects of “face” consciousness on status consumption among Chinese consumers: Perceived social value as a mediator. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J., & Wang, L. (2009). Face as a mediator of the relationship between material value and brand consciousness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(11), 987–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Chen, R., & He, F. (2015). How to promote purchase of carbon offset products: Labeling vs. calculation? Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 942–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, J. S., Filiatrault, P., & Cheron, E. (1997). The attitudes underlying preferences of young urban educated Polish consumers towards products made in western countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P., & Churchill, G. A. (1978). Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(4), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D. (2001). Self-concept and identity. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 499–517) Malden: Blackwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., LSteg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. ACR North American Advances.

  • Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, C. D. (1990). Energy conservation: A social dilemma approach. Social Behaviour, 5(4), 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker, C. H. Jr., & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & McGregor, H. A. (2000). Extrinsic value orientation and “the tragedy of the commons”. Journal of Personality, 68(2), 383–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z., Wen, L., & Zheng, W. (2014). Can ecological product win consumers in China? A study on the effect of product attributes and consumers’ face consciousness on ecological product preference. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 8(2), 182–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist, 36(4), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137–8152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. T. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–238). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, S. P. (2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: An international investigation. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R., & Van Lange, P. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1988). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, W. W. N., Luk, C.-L., Yau, O. H. M., Tse, A. C. B., Sin, L. Y. M., Kwong, K. K., et al. (2009). Do traditional Chinese cultural values nourish a market for pirated CDs? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(S1), 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Y., & Fershtman, C. (1998). Social status and economic performance: A survey. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 801–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. Y., & Ahuvia, A. C. (1998). Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, J., Qian, L., & Singhapakdi, A. (2018). Sharing sustainability: How values and ethics matter in consumers’ adoption of public bicycle-sharing scheme. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, T., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2013). Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 62, 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. A., Cao, Q., & Grigoriou, N. (2011). Consciousness of social face: The development and validation of a scale measuring desire to gain face versus fear of losing face. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71572130), and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 15PJC094).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Wei, F. & Zhang, Xa. Why Does Energy-Saving Behavior Rise and Fall? A Study on Consumer Face Consciousness in the Chinese Context. J Bus Ethics 160, 499–513 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9

Keywords

Navigation