Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:43:41.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism and Peace: Seeing Connections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Karen J. Warren  and
Duane L. Cady
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay we make visible the contribution of women even and especially when women cannot be added to mainstream, non-feminist accounts of peace. We argue that if feminism is taken seriously, then most philosophical discussions of peace must be updated, expanded and reconceived in ways which centralize feminist insights into the interrelationships among women, nature, peace, and war. We do so by discussing six ways that feminist scholarship informs mainstream philosophical discussions of peace.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Peace , Spring 1994 , pp. 4 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol. 1988. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist‐vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Burtt, Edwin A. 1969. Philosophers as warriors. In Critique of war, ed.Ginzberg, Robert. Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
Cady, Duane L. 1991. War, gender, race, and class. Concerned Philosophers for Peace (CPP) Presidential Address, Concerned Philosophers for Peace Newsletter 11(2): 4–10.Google Scholar
Cady, Duane L. 1989. From warism to pacifism: A moral continuum. Philadelphia: Temple Univer sity Press.Google Scholar
The Christian Science Monitor. 1991. (February, 18):18.Google Scholar
Center for Science and Environment. 1984-85. The state of India's environment: The second citizens' report. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Center for Third World Organizing. 1986. Toxics and minority communities. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. On war. Trans.Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, 1976. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1989. Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. In Exposing nuclear phallacies, ed.Russell, Diana E. H.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Commission For Racial Justice of the United Church of Christ. 1987. Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national report on the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. New York: United Church of Christ.Google Scholar
Cooke, Miriam and Woollacott, Angela. Gendering war talk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope‐Kasten, Vance. 1989. A portrait of dominating rationality. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 88(2): 29–34.Google Scholar
D'Eaubonne, Francoise. 1974. Le/eminismeou lamort. Paris: Pierre Horay.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, beaches, and bases. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1989. Ideologies of madness. In Exposing nuclear phallacies, ed.Russell, Diana E. H.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Cynthia. 1991. Women, home, and community. Woman of power: A magazine of feminism, spirituality, and politics (20): 42–43.Google Scholar
Lahar, Stephanie. 1991. Ecofeminist theory and grassroots politics. Hypatia 6(1): 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert Jay, and Falk, Richard. 1982. Indefensible weapons. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Menchú, Rigoberta. 1983. I, Rigoberta Menchú: An Indian woman in Guatemala. ed.Burgos‐Debray, Elisabeth. Trans. Wright, Ann. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Minneapolis Star/Tribune. 1992. War's rape victims have nowhere to turn in Croatia: Women's wounds largely ignored. (December 6).Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1993. Notes toward a feminist peace politics. In Gendering war talk, ed.Cooke, Miriam and Woollacott, Angela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Diana E. H. 1989. Introduction to Exposing nuclear phallacies, ed.Russell, Diana E. H.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1988. Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shulman, Seth. 1992. The threat at home: Confronting the toxic legacy of the U.S. military. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Amanda. 1992. At naval academy, hatred toward women is part of life. Minneapolis Star/Tribune. November 13.Google Scholar
Spretnak, Charlene. 1989. Naming the cultural forces that push us toward war. In Exposing Nuclear Phallacies, ed.Russell, Diana E. H.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Time Magazine. 1993. Another Tailhook pilot flies. (October 4): 18.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. N.d. Taking empirical data seriously: An ecofeminist philosophical perspective. In Ecofeminism: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1994. Toward an ecofeminist peace politics. In Ecological feminist philosophies, ed.Warren, Karen J.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1993. A feminist philosophical perspective on ecofeminist spiritualities. In Ecofeminism and the sacred. Boston: Crossroads/Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1990. The power and promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics 12(3): 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1989. The femininst challenge to the malestream curriculum. Feminist Teacher 4(2/3): 46–52.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1988. Toward an ecofeminist ethic. Studies in the Humanities 15(2): 140–56.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1987. Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Environmental Ethics 9(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar