Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connected Moral Agency in Organizational Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review both the aspects of values-related research that complicate ideations of what we ought to do, as well as the psychological impediments to forming beliefs about the way things are. We find that more traditional moral theories are without solid empirical footing in the psychology of human values. Consequently, we revise the notion of values to align with their socially symbolic utility in self-affirmation and reformulate our understandings of moral agency to allow for the practicalities of context, circumstance, and connectedness. We close by discussing the research and practical implications for these revisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agle, B. and C. Caldwell: 1999, ‹Understanding Research on Values in Business’, Business and Society 38(3), 328–388

  • Alan, W., Bacdayan, P., Kowalski, K., & Roy, M. 2005. Examining the Impact of Ethics Training on Student Values. Education and Training, 47(3): 170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. 1956. Studies of Independence and Conformity. Psychological Monographs, 70(9): 70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1995, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, New York)

  • Bandura, A. 1991. Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action. In W. M. Kurtines J. L. Gerwitz (eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development, Vol. 1: 45–103. New York: Guilford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: 1996, ‹Reflections on Human Agency’, In J.␣Georgas, M. M. Mathouli, E. Besevegis and A.␣Kokkevi (eds.), Contemporary Psychology in Europe: Theory, Research, and Applications (Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Ashland, OH), pp. 194–210

  • Bandura, A. 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities Personality and Social Psychology Review Perspectives on evil and violence., 3(3): 193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Spranca, M. 1997. Protected Values Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes, 70(1): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D.: 2002, ‹Justice Motivation and Moral Motivation’, In M. Ross and D. Miller (eds.), The Justice Motive in Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY), 91–106

  • Batson, D., Collins, P., & Powell, A. 2006. Doing Business After the Fall: The Virtue of Moral Hypocrisy. Jounral of Business Ethics, 66(2): 321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C. & et al. 1997. In a Very Different Voice: Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6): 1335–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D., & Thompson, E. R. 2001. Why Don’t Moral People Act Morally? Motivational Considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2): 54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. 1999. Moral Hypocrisy: Appearing Moral to Oneself Without Being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3): 525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R., & Newman, L. 1994. Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1): 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. 1998. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. 2006. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making 6th Edition (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

  • Beu, D., Buckley, M., & Harvey, M. 2003. Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Construct. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(1): 88–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J., Chattoppadhyay, P., George, E., Glick, W., & Pugliese, D. 1997. The Selective Perception of Managers Revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 716–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and Opinions. London, UK: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, H., G. George and J. Crocker: 2001, ‹Contexts of System Justification and System Evaluation’, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 4(2), 126–137

  • Brief, A., R. Buttram, J. Elliott, R. Reizenstein and R.␣McCline: 1995, ‹Releasing the Beast: A Study of Compliance with Orders to Use Race as a Selection Criterion’, Journal of Social Issues 3(1), 177–193

  • Brown, A., & Jones, M. 2000. Honorable Men and Dishonerable Deeds: Sense Making, Impression Management and Legitimation in the Arms to Iraq Affair. Human Relations, 53(5): 1335–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D., Kacmar, K., & Wadsworth, L. 2002. The Impact of Moral Intensity Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making: Assessing the Relevance of Orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(1): 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 2005, ‹Nuerocognitive Adaptations Designed for Social Exchange’, In D. Buss (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) 584–627

  • Cullen, J., Victor, B., & Stephens, C. 1989. An Ethical Weather Report: Assessing the Organization’s Ethical Climate. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2): 50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. 1992. Social Organization for the Production of Evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2): 199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. 1984. Deception and Division. In: E. Lepore, & B. McLaughlin (eds.), Essays on Actions and Events. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 2004, Problems of Rationality (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK)

  • Davydova, I. and W. Sharrock: 2003, ‹The Rise and Fall of the Fact Value Distinction’, Sociological Review 51(3), 357–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. Mineola, NY: Dover Publication, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T.: 1991, Ideology: An Introduction (Verso, London)

  • Edwards, J.: 1991, ‹Person-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique’, In C. Cooper and I. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6, (Wiley, New York) pp. 283–357

  • Fiske, S.: 2004, ‹Intent and Ordinary Bias: Unintended Thought and Social Motivation Create Casual Prejudice’, Journal of Social Issues 17(2), 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. 1991. Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. 1980. A Taxonomyof Ethical Ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1): 175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. 1995. Values, Nature and Culture in the American Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick W. and J. Weber: 1987, ‹The Values of Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and Normative Implications’, In W. Frederick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance, Vol. 9, (JAI Press, New York) pp. 131–152

  • Freeman, E.: 2006, Authenticity, Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GW

  • Freeman, E., & Werhane, P. 2004. Business, Science and Ethics. Charlottsville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A., & Sullivan, T. 1987. Work: The Process and the Person. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4): 649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.: 1992, ‹The Simulation Theory: Objections and Misconceptions’, Mine and Language 7(1), 11–34

  • Grube, J., D. Mayton, and S. Ball-Rokeach: 1994, ‹Inducing Change In Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: Belief System Theory and the Method of Value Self-Confrontation’, Journal of Social Issues 50(4), 153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1991. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J.: 2003, ‹The Moral Emotions’, In R. Davidson, K.␣Scherer and H. Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK)

  • Harman, G. 2000. Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Funadmental Attribution Error. In: G. Harman (ed.), Expplaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P., Zahn-Waxler, C., & McShane, K. 2006. We Are, By Nature, Moral Creatures: Biological Bases of Concern for Others. In: M. Killen, J. Smetana (eds.), Handbook of Moral Development. 483–516. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlin, P. 2003. And the award for best actor goes to ...: Facades of Conformity in Organizational Settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. L. 2006. A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1): 2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1907/1948. Essays on Pragmatism. New York: Hafner

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): pp. 366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., and S. Berglas: 1999, ‹Control of the Attributions About the Self Through Self-Handicapping Strategies: The Appeall of Alchohol and the Role of Underachievement’, In R. Baumeister (ed.), The Self in Social Psychology (Psychology Press, NewYork), pp.␣430–435

  • Jost, J., G. Fitzsimmons and A. Kay: 2004, ‹The Ideological Animal’, In E. Greenberg, S. Koole and T. Pyszczynski (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology, (Guilford Press, New York) pp. 263–283

  • Jost, J. and O. Hunyady: 2005, ‹Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(5), 260–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., S. Blount, J. Pfeffer, and G. Hunyady: 2003, Fair Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings, Vol. 25, (Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK) pp. 53–91

  • Kluckhohn, C.: 1951, ‹Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification’, In T. Parsons, and E. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)

  • Kohlberg, L. 1984. The Psychology of Moral development. San francisco, CA: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, C., & Zanna, M. 1988. Justifying Attitudes by Appealing to Values: A Functional Perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3): 247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, C. and M. Zanna: 1994, ‹The Rhetorical Use of Values to Justify Social and Intergroup Attitudes’, Journal of Social Issues 50(4), 47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.: 1980, The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (Plenum, New York)

  • Malle, B., J. Knobe, M. O'Laughlin, G. Pearce, and S. Nelson: 2000, ‹Conceptual Structure and Social Functions of Behavior Explanations: Beyond Person Situation Attributions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(3), 309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. 1970. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, B.: 1983, `The Parable of Sadhu', Harvard Business Review (Sept./Oct.): 103–108

  • Millgram, S. 1963. The Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 67(3): 371–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, D. 2006. Ethics Blind Spots in Organizations: How Systematic Errors in Person Perception Undermine Moral AGency. Organization Studies, 27(3): 413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and F. Engles: 1974, The German Ideology, (Arthur, London, UK)

  • Moore, G. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1984. Philosophical Explanations. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Monterosso, J., E., Royzman and B. Schwartz: 2005. ‹Explaining Away Responsibility: Effects of Scientific Explanation on Perceived Culpability’, Ethics and Behavior 15(2), 139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1978/1937, The Structure of Social Action, (McGraw Hill, New York)

  • Pears, D. 1984. Motivated Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B. and J. Hetts: 2001, ‹Underworked and Overpaid: Elevated Entitlement in Men's Self-Pay’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37(2), 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics Without Onotlogy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E., & Meglino, B. 1987. Issues in Work Value Measurement. Research in Corporate Social Performance, 9(9): 153–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. 1999. Post-Conventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbuam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, W.: 1988, `Social Self-Deceptions', In A. O. Rorty and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception, (University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA) pp. 380–389

  • Ryan, L., & Ciavarella, M. 2002. Tapping the Source os Moral Approbation: The Moral Referent Group. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(2): 179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L., & Riordan, C. 2000. The Development of a Measure of Moral Approbation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3): 448–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, S., & Casebeer, W. 2005. A Social Psychological View of Morality: Why Knowledge of Situational Influences On Behavior Can Improve Character Development Practices. Journal of Moral Education, 34(1): 73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.: 1996, ‹Value Priorities and Behavior’, In S.␣Seligman, J. Olson, and M. Zanna (eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 8: 1–24. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Sennet, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character. New York: W.W. Norton Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. and F. Pratto: 1999, Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge University Press, New York)

  • Smith, B. 2001. Davidson, Irrationaltiy, and Ethics. Philosophy Today, 45(3): 242–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. 2003. The Psychology of Good and Evil. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L., & Haberman, D. 1998. Ten Theories of Human Nature (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Oress

    Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R. 1983. From Moral Judgment to Moral Action. In: H. Weinrich-Haste, & D. Locke (eds.), Morality in the Making: Thought, Action, and the Social Context. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons. 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, M. and V. Street: 2006, ‹The Effect of Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision-Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 64(2), 343–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A., & Messick, D. 2004. Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2): 223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P., Peterson, R., & Lerner, J. 1996. Revising the Value Pluralism Model: Incorporating Social Content and Context Postulates. In: S. Seligman, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 8: 25–52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbuam Associates, Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, I. 1982. Acting Against One’s Better Judgment. In: G. Mortimore (ed.), Weakness of the WIll. London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooke, W., & Ickes, W. 1988. A Measure of Adherence to Conventional Morality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6(3/4): 310–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wilely and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P. 1988. Selectivity and Selective Perception: An Investigation of Manager’s Belief Structures and Information Processing. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4): 873–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G., Teague, B., & Papamarcos, S. 2004. Moral Hypocrisy: A Matter of Measures? International Jounral of Ethics, 3(4): 371–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. 2006. Virtue in Organizations: Moral Identity as a Foundation for Moral Agency. Organization studies, 27(3): 341–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A., & Freeman, R. E. 1998. Oragnization Studies and the New Pragmatism, Anti-Positivism and theSearch for Ethics Organization Science, 9(2): 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C., Shepard, J. M., & Markham, S. E. 1997. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Climate and Ethical Behavior from Multiple Levels of Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(16): 1705–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M.: 1998, ‹Agency and Organization: Toward a␣Cyborg-Consciousness’, Human Relations 51(10), 1209–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. 2004. A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil: Understnading How Good People Are Transformed into Perpetrators. In: A. Miller (ed.), The Social Psychology of Evil. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. 1974. Obedience to Authority. American Psychologist, 29(7): 566–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management and Marketing, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, P. O. Box 1100, Edwardsville, IL, 62026, U.S.A.

    George W. Watson

  2. The Darden School, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

    R. Edward Freeman & Bobby Parmar

Authors
  1. George W. Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Edward Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bobby Parmar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George W. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, G.W., Freeman, R. & Parmar, B. Connected Moral Agency in Organizational Ethics. J Bus Ethics 81, 323–341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9497-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9497-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation