Skip to main content
Log in

‘The Impact of Personal and Organizational Moral Philosophies on Marketing Exchange Relationships: A Simulation Using the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game’

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of individual and firm moral philosophies on marketing exchange relationships. Personal moral philosophies range from the extreme forms of true altruists and true egoists, along with three hybrids that represent middle ground (i.e., realistic altruists, tit-for-tats, and realistic egoists). Organizational postures are defined as Ethical Paradigm, Unethical Paradigm, and Neutral Paradigm, which result in changes to personal moral philosophies and company and industry performance. The study context is a simulation of an exchange environment using a variation of the prisoners’ dilemma game. A literature review is provided in the opening section, followed by details on the simulation, discussion of the results, and the implications for theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Axelrod W. D. Hamilton (1981) ArticleTitle‘The Evolution of Cooperation’ Science 211 1390–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Axelrod (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation Basic Books, Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bazzan R. Bordini J. Campbell (2002) ‘Evolving Agents with Moral Sentiments in an Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Exercise’ S. Parsons P. Gmytrasiewicz M. Wooldridge (Eds) Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent-Based Systems Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Bellizzi R. W. Hasty (2003) ArticleTitle‘Supervising Unethical Sales Force Behavior: How Strong is the Tendency to Treat Top Sales Performers Leniently?’ Journal of Business Ethics 43 IssueIDApril 337–351

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Bellizzi R. E. Hite (1989) ArticleTitle‘Supervising Unethical Sales Force Behavior’ Journal of Marketing 53 IssueIDApril 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Brinkmann (2002) ArticleTitle‘Business and Marketing Ethics: Concepts, Approaches and Typologies’ Journal of Business Ethics 41 IssueIDNovember/December 159–177

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bruce C. U. Stephens (1998) ArticleTitle‘Objections to an Objectivist Approach to Integrity’ Academy of Management Review 23 IssueIDJanuary 162–169

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. DeConinck (1992) ArticleTitle‘How Sales Managers Control Unethical Sales Force Behavior’ Journal of Business Ethics 11 IssueIDOctober 789–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J.: 1998, ‘A Research Odyssey in Sales Management’, Academy of Science Review, 1998 (10), 1–7

  • O. C. Ferrell L. G. Gresham (1985) ArticleTitle‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’ Journal of Marketing 49 IssueIDSummer 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gick (2003) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Theory and Moral Behavior: The Contribution of F.. A. Hayek to Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueIDJune 149–165

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Goolsby S. D. Hunt (1992) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing’ Journal of Marketing 56 IssueIDJanuary 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Grcic (1985) ArticleTitle‘Democratic Capitalism: Developing a Conscience for the Corporation’ Journal of Business Ethics 4 IssueIDApril 145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Guttman (2003) ArticleTitle‘Repeated Interaction and the Evolution of Preferences for Reciprocity’ The Economic Journal 113 IssueIDJuly 631–656

    Google Scholar 

  • R. P. Hill (2002) ArticleTitle‘Compassionate Love, Agape, and Altruism: A New Framework for Understanding and Supporting Impoverished Consumers’ Journal of Macromarketing 22 IssueIDJune 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • R. P. Hill D. L. Stephens I. Smith (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Examination of Individual Firm Behavior’ Business and Society Review 108 IssueIDSeptember 339–362

    Google Scholar 

  • F. N. Ho S. J. Vitell J. H. Barnes R. Desborde (1997) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Correlates of Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Marketing: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Moral Development’ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 IssueIDSpring 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • S. D. Hunt S. J. Vitell (1986) ArticleTitle‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’ Journal of Macromarketing 6 IssueIDSpring 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Kelley D. R. Elm (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones’s Issue-Contingent Model’ Journal of Business Ethics 48 IssueIDDecember 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Klein (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Natural Roots of Capitalism and Its Virtues and Values’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueIDJuly 387–401

    Google Scholar 

  • N. B. Kurland (1995) ArticleTitle‘Ethics, Incentives, and Conflicts of Interest: A Practical Solution’ Journal of Business Ethics 14 IssueID6 465–475 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00872087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Oakes (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Sales Process and the Paradoxes of Trust’ Journal of Business Ethics 9 IssueIDSeptember 671–679

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. O’Boyle L. E. Dawson (1992) ArticleTitle‘The American Marketing Association Code of Ethics: Instructions for Authors’ Journal of Business Ethics 11 IssueIDDecember 921–932

    Google Scholar 

  • L. V. Ryan M. Ciavarella (2002) ArticleTitle‘Tapping the Source of Moral Approbation: The Moral Referent Group’ Journal of Business Ethics 38 IssueIDJune 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Schroeder (2000) ArticleTitle‘Morality De-Kanted or the Biological Roots of Moral Behavior’ International Journal of Values-Based Management 13 IssueID3 297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell (1991) ArticleTitle‘Analyzing the␣Ethical Decision Making of Sales Professionals’ Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management XI IssueID4Fall 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell G. R. Franke (1999) ArticleTitle‘Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies’ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 IssueIDWinter 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Snider R. P. Hill D. Martin (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms’ Journal of Business Ethics 48 IssueIDDecember 175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Sommers (1997) ArticleTitle‘Useful Friendships: A Foundation for Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 16 IssueIDSeptember 1453–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Stedron (2004) ArticleTitle‘Forecasts for Artificial Intelligence’ Futurist 38 IssueID2 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • L. K. Trevino (1986) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’ Academy of Management Review 11 IssueID3 601–617

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Valentine T. Barnett (2002) ArticleTitle‘Ethics Codes and Sales Professionals’ Perceptions of Their Organizations Ethical Values’ Journal of Business Ethics 40 IssueIDOctober 191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • T. R. Wotruba (1990) ArticleTitle‘A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, With a Focus on Sales Organizations’ Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 10 IssueID2 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wright (1995) ArticleTitle‘Can Moral Judgment and Ethical Behaviour Be Learned? A Review of the Literature’ Management Decision 33 IssueID10 17–28 Occurrence Handle10.1108/00251749510100212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Watkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watkins, A., Hill, R.P. ‘The Impact of Personal and Organizational Moral Philosophies on Marketing Exchange Relationships: A Simulation Using the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game’. J Bus Ethics 62, 253–265 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8714-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8714-9

Keywords

Navigation