Abstract
Nick Huggett and Robert Weingard (1994) have recently proposed a novel approach to interpreting field theories in physics, one which makes central use of the fact that a field generally has an infinite number of degrees of freedom in any finite region of space it occupies. Their characterization, they argue, (i) reproduces our intuitive categorizations of fields in the classical domain and thereby (ii) provides a basis for arguing that the quantum field is a field. Furthermore, (iii) it accomplishes these tasks better than does a well-known rival approach due to Paul Teller (1990, 1995). This paper contends that all three of these claims are mistaken, and suggests that Huggett and Weingard have not shown how counting degrees of freedom provides any insight into the interpretation or the formal properties of field theories in physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Huggett, N. and Weingard, R.: 1994, 'On the Field Aspect of Quantum Fields', Erkenntnis 40, 293-301.
Redhead, M.: 1983, 'Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers', in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 57-99.
Redhead, M.: 1988, 'A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Field Theory', in H. R. Brown and R. Harré (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 9-23.
Teller, P.: 1990, 'What the Quantum Field Is Not', Philosophical Topics 18, 175-184.
Teller, P.: 1995, An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wayne, A. DEGREES OF FREEDOM AND THE INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Erkenntnis 46, 165–173 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005324024416
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005324024416