Skip to main content
Log in

Doing philosophy with words

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the coverage of ordinary language philosophy in Scott Soames' Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. After praising the book's virtues, I raise three points where I dissent from Soames' take on the history. First, I suggest that there is more to ordinary language philosophy than the rather implausible version of it that Soames sees to have been destroyed by Grice. Second, I argue that confusions between analyticity, necessity and priority are less important to the ordinary language period than Soames takes them to be. Finally, I claim that Soames' criticisms of Ryle turn in part on attributing reductionist positions to Ryle that Ryle did not hold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2000). Black Swans: The formative influences in Australian philosophy. In b.␣Brogaard, & B. Smith (Eds.), Rationality and irrationality (pp. 11–17). Kirchberg: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B. (1999). Perception and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (2002). The problem of perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (1998a). Revisionism about Reference. In P. Humphreys, & J. Fetzer (Eds.), The new theory of reference. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (1998b). More revisionism about reference. In P. Humphreys, & J. Fetzer (Eds.), The new theory of reference. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century (2 vols). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G. J. (1989). J. L. Austin. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, H. (2004). The magic prism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1956). Remarks on the foundations of Mathematics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Weatherson.

Additional information

Contribution to Symposium on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherson, B. Doing philosophy with words. Philos Stud 135, 429–437 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9026-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9026-3

Keywords

Navigation