Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ICE-theory of technical functions

Houkes, Wybo and Vermaas, Pieter E.: Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, viii+175pp, €99.95 HB

  • Book Symposium
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boon, M. 2011. In defence of engineering sciences. On the epistemological relations between science and technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15(1): 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, M. Forthcoming. Scientific concepts in the engineering sciences: epistemic tools for creating and intervening with phenomena. In scientific concepts and investigative practice, eds. Feest, U., and F. Steinle. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter GMBH & CO. KG, Series: Berlin Studies in Knowledge Research.

  • Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs and steel. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W. 2008. Designing is the construction of use plans. In Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture, eds. P.E. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, and S. Moore, 37–49. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W., and P.E. Vermaas. 2009. Contemporary engineering and the metaphysics of artefacts. The Monist 92: 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, Peter. 1993. Making a difference. Philosophica 51: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, Peter, Darden Lindley, and Carl Craver. 2000. Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthen, M. 1997. Teleology and the product analogy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, A., H. de Groot, and A. Holzwarth (eds.). 2006. Harnessing solar energy for the production of clean fuel. White Paper by an international task force under the auspices of the European Science Foundation. ISBN 978-90-9023907-1 http://ssnmr.leidenuniv.nl/files/ssnmr/CleanSolarFuels.pdf.

  • Petroski, H. 1992. The evolution of useful things. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, J., R. Fanciulli, N. Dijkhuizen, A.L. Moore, J. Hauer, T. Buckup, M. Motzkus, and J.L. Herek. 2008. Controlling the efficiency of an artificial light-harvesting complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 105(22): 7641–7646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strevens, M. 2008. Depth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, A. 2003. Realism and human kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 580–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, A. 2007. Artefacts and human concepts. In Creations of the mind, ed. E. Margolis, and S. Laurence, 52–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermaas, P.E. 2010. Focusing philosophy of engineering: analyses of technical functions and beyond. In Philosophy and engineering: an emerging agenda, ed. I. van de Poel, and D.E. Goldberg, 61–73. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Erik, and Helena de Preester. 2005. Micro-explanations of laws. In In structures in scientific cognition. Essays in debate with Theo Kuipers, volume 2, eds. R. Festa, A. Aliseda, and J. Peijnenburg, 177–186. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A.G. 2003. Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34: 633–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A.G. 2005. The function debate in philosophy. Acta Biotheoretica 53: 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Raoul Gervais (Ghent University) for his comments on each contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University (UGent), Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    E. Weber

  2. Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167, Hannover, Germany

    T. A. C. Reydon

  3. Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

    M. Boon

  4. Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    W. Houkes

  5. Department of Philosophy, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands

    P. E. Vermaas

Authors
  1. E. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. A. C. Reydon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Boon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Houkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. E. Vermaas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, E., Reydon, T.A.C., Boon, M. et al. The ICE-theory of technical functions. Metascience 22, 23–44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-012-9642-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-012-9642-9

Search

Navigation