Abstract
This paper is both a response to the four reviewers in a special symposium on my book Adam Smith’s Pluralism and a substantive discussion of philosophy of education. In it, I introduce what I call “the educative critique,” a mode of analysis similar to Marxist, feminist, or postcolonial critiques, but focusing on the educative role of a text. I argue that choosing education as a theme is itself a solution to interpretive difficulties, not an add-on that only concerns pedagogues and policy-makers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Weinstein (2013, 269).
Ibid., 2.
Especially ibid., 4–5.
Ibid., 65–66.
Noddings (2013).
Weinstein (2004a: 101).
Weinstein (2014, 152).
Weinstein, Adam Smith’s Pluralism, 131.
Ibid.; Skinner (1996, 37).
Weinstein (2002, chap. 6).
Weinstein, “What My Dog Can Do: On the Effects of WN I.ii.2.”
Weinstein, Adam Smith’s Pluralism, 8; Macintyre (1989, 4).
Weinstein, Adam Smith’s Pluralism, 11–12.
Weinstein (2004b).
For an elaboration of ASP’s account of justice see: Weinstein (2015).
As MacIntyre writes: “There is nothing paradoxical at all in asserting that from within particular traditions assertions of universal import may be and are made, assertions formulated within the limits set by the conceptual, linguistic and argumentative possibilities of that tradition, but assertions which involve the explicit rejection of any incompatible claim, advanced in any terms whatsoever from any rival standpoint. So within every major cultural and social tradition we find some distinctive conception of the human good presented as – true. And although these claims to truth are supported within different traditions by appeal to rival and often de facto incommensurable standards of rational justifications, no such tradition is or can be relativistic about the truth of its own assertions or about truth” (MacIntyre (1995, 296); Weinstein 2002, chap 6).
References
Brown, Vivienne. 1994. Adam Smith’s Discourse: Canonicity, Commerce and Conscience. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Griswold, Charles L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1995. “A partial response to my critics.” In After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre, ed. John Horton and Susan Mendus, 283–304. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Macintyre, Alasdair. 1989. Whose justice? Which rationality? 1st ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Noddings, Nel. 2013. Education and democracy in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Skinner, Andrew Stewart. 1996. A system of social science papers relating to Adam Smith, 2nd ed. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2013. Adam Smith’s pluralism: Rationality, education, and the moral sentiments. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2004a. Aliens, traitors, and elitists: University values and the faculty. Thought and Action 19(2): 95–106.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2004b. Neutrality, pluralism, and education: Civic education as learning about the other. Studies in Philosophy and Education 23(4): 235–263.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2002. On MacIntyre. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2014. What my dog can do: On the effects of WN I. ii. 2. In Propriety and prosperity, ed. David F. Hardwick, and Leslie Marsh, 147–165. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weinstein, Jack Russell. 2015 “The political hypotheses of Adam Smith’s pluralism: A response to my commentators.” Cosmos and Taxis 2(3), forthcoming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstein, J.R. Adam Smith and the Educative Critique: A response to my commentators. Stud Philos Educ 34, 541–550 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9478-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9478-z