Abstract
In a well known story Derek Parfit describes a disconnection between two entities that normally (in real life) travel together through space and time, namely your personal identity consisting of both mind and body. Realising the possibility of separation, even if it might never happen in real life, new questions arise that cast doubt on old solutions. In human reproduction, in real life, at present the fetus spends approximately nine months inside the pregnant woman. But, we might envisage other possibilities.
Historically, the first era is the normal conception inside the woman, the growth of the fetus in the womb and then, after nine months, birth and the appearance of a new individual. The second era is In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF). The fetus starts outside the woman as a fertilised egg, moves to the body of the woman and spends nine month there, where the body of the woman and the fetus travel together in space-time to separate at birth. In the third era of reproductive ectogenesis, the two never travel together. The fetus spends its gestational time entirely outside the woman’s body. We have two entities separated in space-time the whole time. The intimate connection consisting in the fetus being a part of the woman’s body is gone.
In this paper I will briefly comment on the three eras of human reproduction — and primarily on the relationship between the new individual and the woman — and then spend some time with a fictional story illustrating some moral consequences of the third era. The story is from Pig Pharmaceuticals Limited and how they in the year 2050 report the successful development of pig-related pregnancies with transgenic pigs as surrogate mothers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGrath, J. & Solter, D. (1984) Inability of mouse blastomere nuclei transferred to enucleated zygotes to supposrt development in vitro. Science 226: 1317–183.
Solter, D. (2001) “Mammalian Cloning: Advances and Limitations”. Nature Review Genetics 1: 199–206.
Bush, G. W. (2001) Remarks by the President on Stem Cell Research. http://www.nih.gov/news/stemcell/index.htm (1 Nov. 2001).
Parfit, D. (1987) Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 199–200.
Tong, R. (1997) Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, Westview Press, Boulder, p. 129.
Nozick, R. (1980) Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 42–45.
Glover, J. (1984) What sort of people should there be? Penguin books, Harmondsworth, pp. 102–113.
Dennet, D. (1982) Where am I?, in: Hofstadter, D. & Dennet, D. (eds) The Mind’s I. Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, pp. 217–229.
Thomson, J. J. (1985) A Defence of Abortion, in: Wasserstrom, R. (ed.) Today’s Moral Problems, Macmillan, New York.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1923) Daedalus or Science and the Futur, in: Krishna R. Dronamraju (ed) (1995) Haldane’s Daedalus Revisited, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York and Tokyo.
Young, M. (2002) The Rise of the Meriticracy, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (US) and London.
Persson, A. (2001) “Optimismen falnar om xenotranplantation”. Läkartidningen 98:3200–02 (Optimism fades for xenotransplantation”).
Wellman, C. (2002) The Concept of fetal rights, Law and Philosophy 21: 65–93.
Welin, S (2002) Ethical Issues in human embryonic stem cell research, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81: 277–382.
Dworkin, R. (1993) Life’s Dominion, HarperCollins, London.
Singer, P. & Wells, D. (1984) The reproduction revolution: new ways of making babies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
European Parliament, Temporary Committee on Human Genetics and Other New Technologies in Modern Medicine (2001) Report on the ethical, legal, economic and social implication of human genetics. (A5-0391/2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Welin, S. Reproductive ectogenesis: The third era of human reproduction and some moral consequences. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 615–626 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0042-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0042-4