Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probability of inconsistencies in theory revision

A multi-agent model for updating logically interconnected beliefs under bounded confidence

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a model for studying communities of epistemically interacting agents who update their belief states by averaging (in a specified way) the belief states of other agents in the community. The agents in our model have a rich belief state, involving multiple independent issues which are interrelated in such a way that they form a theory of the world. Our main goal is to calculate the probability for an agent to end up in an inconsistent belief state due to updating (in the given way). To that end, an analytical expression is given and evaluated numerically, both exactly and using statistical sampling. It is shown that, under the assumptions of our model, an agent always has a probability of less than 2% of ending up in an inconsistent belief state. Moreover, this probability can be made arbitrarily small by increasing the number of independent issues the agents have to judge or by increasing the group size. A real-world situation to which this model applies is a group of experts participating in a Delphi-study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Schweitzer, Brownian Agents and Active Particles, Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences (Springer, 2003), with a foreword by J.D. Farmer

  3. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, J. Art. Soc. Soc. Sim. 5 (2002), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ec.uk/5/3/2.html

  4. M. Macy, R. Willer, Annu. Rev. Soc. 28, 143 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Macy, A. Flache, Social Dynamics from the Bottom up. Agent-Based Models of Social Interaction, in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by P. Hedström, P. Bearman (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 245–268

  6. W. Wood, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 539 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.I. Goldman, Knowledge in a Social World (Clarendon Press, 1999)

  8. I. Douven, C. Kelp, Erkenntnis 75, 271 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Galam, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 403 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lorenz, Physica A 355, 217 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.T. Bernardes, U.M.S. Costa, A.D. Araujo, D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 159 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 315 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Advs. Compl. Syst. 3, 87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Physica A 351, 593 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Axelrod, J. Confl. Resolut. 41, 203 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Fortunato, V. Latora, A. Pluchino, A. Rapisarda, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 10, 1535 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Jacobmeier, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 633 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Pluchino, V. Latora, A. Rapisarda, Eur. Phys. J. B 50, 169 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Lorenz. Fostering Consensus in Multidimensional Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence, in Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications, edited by D. Helbing (Springer, 2008), pp. 321–334

  20. I. Douven, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 41, 148 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Douven, A. Riegler, Logic Jnl. IGPL 18, 323 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, Comput. Econ. 25, 381 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, J. Art. Soc. Soc. Sim. 9 (2006)

  24. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, Episteme 6, 130 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, J.P. Nadal, Complexity 7, 55 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Ramirez-Cano, J. Pitt, Follow the Leader: Profiling Agents in an Opinion Formation Model of Dynamic Confidence and Individual Mind-sets, in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (2006), pp. 660–667

  27. M.H. DeGroot, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69, 118 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Lehrer, C. Wagner, Ration. Consensus Sci. Soc. (Reidel, 1981)

  29. D. Byrne, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62, 713 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Dalkey, O. Helmer, Manage. Sci. 9, 458 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Keeney, F. Hasson, H. McKenna, The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Care Research (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011)

  32. M. Mäs, The Diversity Puzzle. Explaining Clustering and Polarization of Opinions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, 2010

  33. A.T. Bernardes, D. Stauffer, J. Kertész, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 123 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R.A. Hill, R.I.M. Dunbar, Hum. Nat. 14, 53 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, edited by H.A. Linstone, M. Turoff (Addison-Wesley, 1975)

  36. R.W. Hamming, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 29, 147 (1950)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Tavris, E. Aronson, Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) (Harcourt, 2007)

  38. P. Pettit, Philos. Issues 11, 268 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. C. List, C. Puppe, Judgment Aggregation: A Survey, in The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, edited by P. Anand, P. Pattaniak, C. Puppe (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 457–482

  40. L.A. Kornhauser, L.G. Sager, Yale Law J. 96, 82 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. C. List, Soc. Choice Welfare 24, 3 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. K.H. Rosen, Handbook of Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics (CRC Press, 2000)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712 GL, Groningen, The Netherlands

    S. Wenmackers & I. Douven

  2. Department of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 – S3, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    D. E. P. Vanpoucke

Authors
  1. S. Wenmackers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. E. P. Vanpoucke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Douven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Wenmackers.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenmackers, S., Vanpoucke, D.E.P. & Douven, I. Probability of inconsistencies in theory revision. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20617-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20617-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation