Skip to main content
Log in

Radikaler Konstruktivismus und Konstruktionismus

Radical constructivism and constructionism

Die Aporien eines falsch verstandenen Naturalismus

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Both radical constructivism and constructionism are naturalized approaches to epistemology. They try to fertilize results from biology and psychology for epistemological aims. They both refuse epistemological realism as unsustainable metaphysics. This raises the problem of the range of the naturalistic approach to epistemology. Constructivism, in both forms, turns out to be untenable because it runs in an aporia: it must borrow from realism either, or it must qualify its own position as a metaphysical one. But therewith, constructivism would be blamed to be metaphysical itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wendel, H.J. Radikaler Konstruktivismus und Konstruktionismus. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23, 323–352 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801456

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801456

Key words

Navigation