Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Principles Help to Analyse But Often Give No Solution—Secondary Prevention after a Cardiac Event

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate whether or not ethical conflicts can be identified, analysed and solved using ethical principles. The relation between the physician and the patient with ischemic heart disease (IHD) as life style changes are recommended in a secondary prevention program is used as an example. The principal persons affected (the patient and his or her spouse) and the ethical principles (respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice) are combined in a two dimensional model. The most important person affected by the recommendations is the patient. His or her autonomy is challenged by the suggested life style changes, the purpose of which is to promote the future wellbeing and health of the patient. The spouse is indirectly involved in and affected by the process. He or she often feels neglected by caregivers. Ethical conflicts can both be identified and analysed using ethical principles, but often no solution is implied. Most (if not all) physicians would strongly encourage life style changes, but surprisingly there is no uncontroversial justification for this conclusion using principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CABG:

Coronary artery by-pass grafting

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

PCI:

Percutanous coronary intervention

References

  1. Beauchamp T, Childress J (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics (5th edn). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brady A, Oliver M, Pittard J (2001) Secondary prevention in 24 431 patients with coronary heart disease: survey in primary care. Br Med J 322:1463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bremberg S (2004) Paternalism in general practice—physician’s power and patient’s autonomy. (Thesis) Department of Medical Ethics, Lund University, Lund.

  4. Carlsson R, Lindberg G, Westin L, Israelsson B (1997) Influence of coronary nursing management follow-up on lifestyle after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 77:256–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) (2002) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva

  6. Dalal H, Evans P, Campbell J (2004) Recent developments in secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J 328:693–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ford J, Reutter L (1990) Ethical dilemmas associated with small samples. J Adv Nurs 15:187–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillon R, Lloyd A (eds) (1994) Principles of health care ethics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hentinen M (1983) Need for instruction and support of the wives of patients with myocardial infarction. J Adv Nurs 8:519–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kant I (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Hamburg

  11. Kettunen S, Solovievas S, Laamenen R, Santavirta N (1999) Myocardial infarction, spouses’ reactions and their need of support. J Adv Nurs 30:479–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerner D, Kannel W (1986) Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 111:383–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukkarinen H, Kyngäs H (2003) Experiences of the onset of coronary artery disease in a spouse. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2:189–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moser D, Dracup K, Marsden C (1993) Needs of recovering cardiac patients and their spouses: compared views. Int J Nurs Stud 30:105–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray C, Loopez A (1997) Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349:1269–1276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilstun T, Melltorp G, Hermerén G (2000) Survey on attitudes to active euthanasia: to draw normative conclusions is problematic. Scand J Pub Health 28:111–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilstun T, Sjöquist P (2001) From fact to recommendation: explicit value premises makes the conclusions more convincing. J Intern Med 249:121–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nilstun T (1990) Public health measures with HIV-infection. A model for identification and analysis of ethical conflicts. In: Allebeck P, Jansson B (eds) Ethics in Medicine: Individual Integrity Versus Demands of Society (pp 203–213). Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Official Statistics of Sweden. National Bureau of Statistics (1994) Causes of death 1992. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

  20. Official Statistics of Sweden. The National board of health and welfare, centre for epidemiology. Causes of death 2002. Web document published September 2004. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se

  21. Orth-Gomer K, Unden A, Edwards M (1988) Social isolation and mortality in ischemic heart disease. A 10-year follow-up study of 150 middle-aged men. Acta Medica Scand 224:205–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Orwell G (1996) Animal farm. Longman, Harlow (originally published 1945)

  23. Quist-Paulsen P, Gallefoss F (2003) Randomised controlled trial of smoking cessation intervention after admission for coronary heart disease. Br Med J 327:1254–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rigotti N, McKool K, Shifferman S (1994) Predictors of smoking cessation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med 120:287–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosengren A, Spetz C, Köster M, Hammar N, Alfredsson L, Rosén M (2001) Sex differences in survival after myocarical infarction in Sweden. Eur Heart J 22:314–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Gitt A, Behar S, Battler A, Hasdai D (2004) Sex, age, and clinical presentation of acute cononary syndroms. Eur Heart J 25:663–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruhnke G, Wilson S, Akamatsu T, et al (2000) Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Chest 118:1172–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Simons-Morton D, Calfas K, Oldenburg B, Burton N (1998) Effects of interventions in health care settings on physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness. Am J Prev Med 15:413–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Singer P (1979) Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Solzhenitsyn A (1997) The first circle. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (orig. published 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart M, Davidson K, Meade D, Hirth A, Makrides L (2000) Myocardial infarction: survivors’ and spouses’ stress, coping, and support. J Adv Nurs 31:1351–1360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Swedish Medical Products Agency. Web document from a seminary on natural remedies, November 2004. http://www.mpa.se/naturlakemedel/seminarium/041110_alvan.pdf

  33. Williams R, Barefoot J, Califf R, et al (1992) Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. JAMA 267:520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson K, Gibson N, Willan A, Cook D (2000) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality after myocardial infarction. Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. Arch Intern Med 160:939–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wood D, EUROSPIRE I and II group (2001) Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROSPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet 357:995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Ethics, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

    Lars Westin & Tore Nilstun

Authors
  1. Lars Westin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tore Nilstun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Westin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westin, L., Nilstun, T. Principles Help to Analyse But Often Give No Solution—Secondary Prevention after a Cardiac Event. Health Care Anal 14, 111–117 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0016-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0016-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation