The Magic Prism: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, Apr 1, 2004 - Philosophy - 256 pages
The late 20th century saw great movement in the philosophy of language, often critical of the fathers of the subject--Gottlieb Frege and Bertrand Russell--but sometimes supportive of (or even defensive about) the work of the fathers. Howard Wettstein's sympathies lie with the critics. But he says that they have often misconceived their critical project, treating it in ways that are technically focused and that miss the deeper implications of their revolutionary challenge. Wettstein argues that Wittgenstein--a figure with whom the critics of Frege and Russell are typically unsympathetic--laid the foundation for much of what is really revolutionary in this late 20th century movement. The subject itself should be of great interest, since philosophy of language has functioned as a kind of foundation for much of 20th century philosophy. But in fact it remains a subject for specialists, since the ideas are difficult and the mode of presentation is often fairly technical. In this book, Wettstein brings the non-specialist into the conversation (especially in early chapters); he also reconceives the debate in a way that avoids technical formulation. The Magic Prism is intended for professional philosophers, graduate students, and upper division undergraduates.
 

Selected pages

Contents

Two Fundamental Problems Freges Classical Approach
18
Russell and More Frege
33
Revolution in the Philosophy of Language
60
Supplanting Linguistic Cartesianism
75
A Father of the Revolution
91
The Puzzles Informative Identity
114
Essentialism about Meaning Empty Names
144
Bringing Belief Down to Earth Part I Or God Wouldnt Be That Vicious
162
Bringing Belief Down to Earth Part II
191
Whither Propositions?
216
Index
235
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 27 - But are there not thoughts which are true today but false in six months time? The thought, for example, that the tree there is covered with green leaves, will surely be false in six months time. No, for it is not the same thought at all. The words 'this tree is covered with green leaves' are not sufficient by themselves for the utterance, the time of utterance is involved as well.

References to this book

About the author (2004)

Howard Wettstein is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside.

Bibliographic information