Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility: Views from the Frontline

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers an evaluation of corporate policy and practice in respect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) deriving from an analysis of qualitative data, obtained during semi-structured interviews with the representatives of 16 companies from a variety of UK sectors including retail, mining, financial services and mobile telephony. The findings of the empirical survey are presented in five sections that trace chronologically the process of CSR policy development. The first identifies the meaning attributed to CSR by the respondent companies followed in the second section by the factors that are driving them to implement the CSR agenda. The third examines the use of the language of CSR and the concept’s role as either a substantive concept or simple label. The fourth identifies the criteria used for determining CSR policies and the objectives underlying them. The fifth and final section offers an analysis of the respondents’ predictions as to the future development of CSR. On the basis of the findings of the survey, this paper argues that, despite genuine attempts on the part of those responsible for CSR policy development to address stakeholder concerns, the context within which CSR has been implemented hinders its potential to offer stakeholders sufficient information by which to evaluate corporate performance in respect of CSR and the ability of CSR to operate as a meaningful and systematic constraint on corporate behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Andriof M. McIntosh (2001) ‘Introduction’ J. Andriof M. McIntosh (Eds) Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ardriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds) (2002) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Barnard (1997) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Philanthropy, Executives’ Pet Charities and the Agency Problem’ New York Law School Law Review 41 IssueID4 1147–1178

    Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Berle C. G. Means (1936) The Modern Corporation and Private Property MacMillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Bigoness G. L. Blakely (1996) ArticleTitle‘A Crossnational Study of Managerial Values’ Journal of International Studies 27 IssueID40 739–749

    Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Brown P. A. Dacin (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’ Journal of Marketing 61 68–84

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Campbell G. Moore M. Metzger (2002) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Philanthropy in the UK 1985–2000: Some Empirical Findings’ Journal of Business Ethics 39 29–41 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016371731732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Carroll (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’ Business Horizons 34 IssueID4 39–48 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Carroll (2001) ‘The Moral Leader: Essential for Successful Corporate Citizenship’ J. Andriof M. McIntosh (Eds) Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • M. B. E. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitle‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy: 2002, ‘Opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy for the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs’, in European Parliament, Report on the Communication from the Commission Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to sustainable development Com (2002) 347

  • J. Cramer J. Jonker A. Heijden Particlevan der (2004) ArticleTitle‘Making Sense of Corporate Social Responsibility’ Journal of Business Ethics 55 215–222 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10551-004-1903-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Creyer W. T. Ross (1996) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Corporate Behavior on Perceived Product Value’ Marketing Letters 7 IssueID2 173–185 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00434908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. K. Das (2005) ArticleTitle‘How Strong are the Ethical Preferences of Senior Business Executives?’ Journal of Business Ethics 56 69–80 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10551-004-3238-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Davis (1960) ArticleTitle‘Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?’ California Management Review 2 IssueID3 70–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 2002, White Paper: Modernising Company Law, Cmnd 5553

  • M. E. Drumwright (1994) ArticleTitle‘Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion’ Journal of Marketing 58 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Esrock G. B. Leichty (1998) ArticleTitle‘Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting?’ Public Relations Review 24 IssueID3 305 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairtrade Foundation: 2004, ‘Consumer Research About Fairtrade in the UK’, available at http://www. fairtrade.org.uk/about_consumer_research.htm

  • M. Friedman (1962) Capitalism and Freedom University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Commission: 2003, ‘Cadbury Asks Children to Eat Two Million kg of Fat – To Get Fit!’, Press Release 29 April 2003, available at http://www.foodcomm. org.uk/press_cadbury_03.htm

  • A. Gamble G. Kelly (2000) ‘The Politics of the Company’ J. Parkinson A. Gamble G. Kelly (Eds) The Political Economy of the Company Hart Publishing Oxford 21–49

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Garriga D. Melé (2004) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’ Journal of Business Ethics 53 51–71 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, N.: 2004, ‘International Strategic Framework on Corporate Social Responsibility’, Speech at the DTI Conference Centre, London, available at http://www.societyandbusiness.gov.uk

  • T. Guay J. P. Doh G. Sinclair (2004) ArticleTitle‘Non-governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications’ Journal of Business Ethics 52 125–139 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033112.11461.69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Hemingway P. W. Maclagan (2004) ArticleTitle‘Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’ Journal of Business Ethics 50 33–44 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Hester (1973) ‘Social Responsibility of Organisations in a Free Society’ R. Nader M. J. Green (Eds) Corporate Power in America Grossman New York 25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Hockerts L. Moir (2004) ArticleTitle‘Communicating Corporate Responsibility to Investors: The Changing Role of the Investor Relations Function’ Journal of Business Ethics 52 85–98 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033109.35980.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Holmes C. J. Kilbane (1993) ArticleTitle‘Cause-Related Marketing: Selected Effects of Price and Charitable Donations’ Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 1 IssueID4 67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. D. Hopkins (2002) ArticleTitle‘Sustainability in the Internal Operations of Companies’ Corporate Environmental Strategy 9 IssueID2 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ireland (1996) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Governance, Stakeholding, and the Company: Towards a Less Degenerate Capitalism?’ Journal of Law and Society 23 IssueID3 287–320

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Jansson (2005) ArticleTitle‘The Stakeholder Model: The Influence of the Ownership and Governance Structures’ Journal of Business Ethics 56 1–13 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10551-004-2168-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Maignan O. C. Ferrell (2001) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Citizenship as a Marketing Instrument: Concepts, Evidence and Research Directions’ European Journal of Marketing 35 IssueID3/4 457–484

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Marshall G. B. Rossman (1989) Designing Qualitative Research Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • T. May (1993) Social Research. Issues, Methods and Process Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaughry, J.: 1972, ‘Milton Friedman Responds’, Business and Society Review 1(Spring) 5–16

  • McIntosh, M.: 2001, ‘Editorial’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 3(Autumn), 3–8

  • M. McIntosh R. Thomas D. Leipziger G. Coleman (2003) Living Corporate Citizenship Prentice Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Minow (1999) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Charity An Oxymoron?’ The Business Lawyer 54 IssueID3 997–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Mohr D. J. Webb K. E. Harris (2001) ArticleTitle‘Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior’ Journal of Consumer Affairs 35 IssueID1 45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Monster: 2004, ‘CSR Not Understood by Over One-Third of British Workers’, Press Release available at http://press.monster.co.uk/2100_en-GB_pf.asp

  • G. Moore (2001) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the UK Supermarket Industry’ Journal of Business Ethics 34 299–315 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1012537016969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Parkinson (1996) Corporate Power and Responsibility Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. L. J. Pava J. Krausz (1997) ArticleTitle‘Criteria for Evaluating the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility’ Journal of Business Ethics 16 IssueID3 337–347 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017920217290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Roach (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Paradox of the Traditional Justifications for Exclusive Shareholder Governance Protection: Expanding the Pluralist Approach’ The Company Lawyer 22 IssueID1 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Robertson N. Nicholson (1996) ArticleTitle‘Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in U.K. Firms’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 IssueID10 1095–1106 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00412050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sarre M. Doig B. Fiedler (2001) ArticleTitle‘Reducing the Risk of Corporate Irresponsibility: The Trend to Corporate Social Responsibility’ Accounting Forum 25 IssueID3 300–317 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-6303.00068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. P. Sethi (1970) Business Corporations and the Black Man Chandler Publishing Company Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • P. S. Sethi (2005) ArticleTitle‘Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a Must for Public Pension Funds – Because There is no Better Alternative’ Journal of Business Ethics 56 99–129 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10551-004-5455-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. W. Smith (1997) ArticleTitle‘If Not Corporate Philanthropy, Then What?’ New York Law School Law Review 41 IssueID3 757–770

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparkes C. J. Cowton (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility’ Journal of Business Ethics 52 45–57 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Swanson (1995) ArticleTitle‘Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorientating the Corporate Social Performance Model’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P.: 2000, ‘UN-Business Partnerships: Whose Agenda Counts?’, Paper presented at Seminar on ‘Partnerships for Development or Privatization of The Multilateral System?’, in Oslo, Norway, 8 December 2000, (UNRISD, Switzerland)

  • D. Votaw (1973) ‘Genius Becomes Rare’ D. Votaw S. P. Sethi (Eds) The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values and Contemporary Problems Prentice Hall New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Waddock (2001) ‘Integrity and Mindfulness: Foundations of Corporate Citizenship’ J. Andriof M. McIntosh (Eds) Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 26–38

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Whitehouse (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility as Citizenship and Compliance: Initiatives on the Domestic, European and Global Level’ Journal of Corporate Citizenship 11 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Wood (1991) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’ Academy of Management Review 16 IssueID4 691–718

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wulfson (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Ventures’ Journal of Business Ethics 29 135–145 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006459329221

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Whitehouse.

Additional information

Lisa Whitehouse is a Senior Lecturer in the Law School at the University of Hull. She has published in the areas of the English law of mortgage, the UK railway infrastructure and corporate social responsibility. She received her Ph.D. in Law from the University of Hull.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitehouse, L. Corporate Social Responsibility: Views from the Frontline. J Bus Ethics 63, 279–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3243-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3243-0

Keywords

Navigation