Skip to main content
Log in

Desires in Practical Reasoning

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inferences from desired ends to intended necessary means seem to be among the most unproblematic elements of practical reasoning. A closer look dissolves this appearance, however, when we see that such inferences are defeasible. We can nevertheless understand such inferences as leading to the adoption of plans, by analogy with inferences leading to explanations. Plans should satisfy at least some important ends desired by the agent, be consistent with the satisfaction of other desired ends, and be inconsistent with as few desired ends as possible. A rational plan may rule out the satisfaction of some desires, however, and this feature explains the defeasibility of such inferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Brandom (1994) Making It Explicit Harvard Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (2003): Reasoning. The Brown-Blackwell Lectures. <http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfop0060/>.

  • G. Harman (1986) Change in View: Principles of Reasoning MIT Press/Bradford Books Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Thagard E. Millgram (1995) “Inference to the Best Plan: A Coherence Theory of Decision” A. Ram D.B. Leake (Eds) Goal-Driven Learning MIT Press Cambridge 439–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, H. Desires in Practical Reasoning. Philos Stud 129, 197–221 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7820-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7820-3

Keywords

Navigation