Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The continuing existence of zoos and their good purposes such as conservation, science, education, and recreation, can be ethically justified only if zoos guarantee the welfare of their animals. The usual criteria for measuring animal welfare in zoos are physical health, long life, and reproduction. This paper looks at these criteria and finds them insufficient. Additional criteria are submitted to expand the range of welfare considerations: natural and abnormal behavior; freedom and choice; and dignity. All these criteria should play a role in analyzing zoo animal welfare and interests but dignity has the overriding part because it impacts on both animal and human interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. C. Bostock (1993) Zoos and Animals Rights: The Ethics of Keeping Animals Routledge London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Corra, Ema, Corra! Online http://www.uol.com.br/cienciahoje/chdia/n966.htm>, 16th March 2005

  • H. Hediger (1950) Wild Animals in Captivity Butterworths Scientific Publications London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hancock (1996) “Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh no” G. G. Norton M. Hutchins E. F. Stevens T. R. Maple (Eds) Ethics on the Ark: Ethics, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation Smithsonian Institution Press Washington 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Jamieson (1985) “Against Zoos” P. Winter (Eds) Defence of Animals Basil Blackwell Oxford 108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Kant (1998) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Lacy (1996) “Culling Surplus Animals for Population Management” G. G. Norton M. Hutchins E. F. Stevens T. R. Maple (Eds) Ethics on the Ark: Ethics, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation Smithsonian Institution Press Washington 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Maple R. McManamon E. Stevens (1996) “Defining the Good Zoo: Animal Care, Maintenance, and Welfare” G. G. Norton M. Hutchins E. F. Stevens T. R. Maple (Eds) Ethics on the Ark: Ethics, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation Smithsonian Institution Press Washington 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Marcel (1971) The Existential Background of Human Dignity Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Miller D. Biggins A. Vargas M. Hutchins L. Hanebury J. Godbey S. Anderson C. Wemmer J. Oldemeier (1998) “Black-Footed Ferret Reintroduction” D. J. Shepherdson J. D. Mellen M. Hutchins (Eds) Second Nature – Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals Smithsonian Institution Press Washington and London 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Mullan G. Marvin (1999) Zoo Culture University of Illinois Press Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNamePlato (1997) Defence of Socrates, Euthyphro, Crito Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Stamp Dawkins (1980) Animal Suffering – The Science of Animal Welfare Chapman and Hall London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Veselovsk (2000) _lov_k a zví_e [Man and Animals] Academia Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Wise (2002) Drawing the Line – Science and the Case for Animal Rights Perseus Books Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dita Wickins-Dražilová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wickins-Dražilová, D. Zoo Animal Welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 27–36 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4380-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4380-2

Keywords

Navigation