Decolonizing Engagement? Creating a Sense of Community through Collaborative Filmmaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v9i2.1141Keywords:
Indigenous peoples, community engaged scholarship, collaborative filmmaking, intercultural dialogue, environmental justiceAbstract
The visual medium has the potential to be a creative avenue for enhancing awareness, critical thought and social justice. Through the prism of collaborative filmmaking, academic-activists can enrich textual analyses while creating what Jacques Rancière calls a “sense of community” among participants. This article reflects on the process of co-producing an Indigenous youth-driven documentary film, Indian Givers, which is publicly available on YouTube. It discusses the applied practice of engaging in a collaborative process with the aim of countering Western models of knowledge. The film and this article each draw into focus the experiences and stories of Indigenous youth who live in a highly polluted place commonly referred to as Canada’s “Chemical Valley.” Informed by Chantal Mouffe’s notion of agonism, I contend that collaborative filmmaking contributes to anti-oppressive and community engaged scholarship by facilitating intercultural dialogue, offering a reflexive and relational approach to research, co-creating knowledge and contributing to social action. This paper reflects on some of the challenges of collaborative filmmaking in order to contribute to academic-activist research. As an anti-oppressive research tool, collaborative filmmaking provides a forum for resistance to dominant colonial discourses while creating space for radical difference in pursuit of decolonization.
References
Bloustein, G. (2012). Play, affect, and participatory video as a reflexive research strategy. In E-J. Milne, C. Mitchell & N. de Lange (Eds.), The handbook of participatory video (pp. 115-130). Lanham: Altamira Press.
Bouchard, G, & C. Taylor. (2008). Building the future: A time for reconciliation. (Report of the Consultation Commission on Accommodation Practices Related to Cultural Diversity). Quebec: Government of Quebec. Retrieved from https://www.mce.gouv.qc.ca/publications/CCPARDC/rapport-final-integral-en.pdf
Cahill, C. (2007). The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities in a participatory action research process. Gender, Place, and Culture, 14(3), 267-292.
Campbell, D. (2007). Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography, 26(1), 357-382.
Clover, D. (2011). Successes and challenges of feminist arts-based participatory methodologies with homeless/street-involved women in Victoria. Action Research, 9(12), 12-26.
Clover, D. (2014). Facilitating and teaching feminist visual arts-based research. In C. Etmanski, B. Hall & T. Dawson (Eds.), Learning and teaching community-based research (pp. 135-149). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
De Guerre, M. (Writer & Director), & Mendelsohn, A. (Director). (2008). The Disappearing male. Canada: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Red Apple Entertainment.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Schizophrenia and capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ecojustice. (2007). Exposing Canada's Chemical Valley. Toronto: Ecojustice.
Flicker, S., Savan, B., Kolenda, B., & Mildenberger, M. (2008). A snapshot of community-based research in Canada: Who? What? Why? How? Health Education Research, 23(1), 106-114.
Gabrielson T., & Parady, K. (2010). Corporeal citizenship: Rethinking green citizenship through the body. Environmental Politics, 19(3), 374-391.
Hankivsky, O. (Ed.). (2012). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework. Vancouver: BC Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Rutledge.
Hoover, E., Cook, K., Plain, R., Sanchez, K., Waghiyi, V., Miller, P., . . . Carpenter, D. (2012). Indigenous peoples of North America: Environmental exposures and reproductive justice. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1645-1649.
Kindon, S. (2003). Participatory video in geographic research: A feminist practice of looking? Area, 35(2), 142-153.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lynes, K. (2013). Prismatic media, transnational circuits: Feminism in a globalized present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mackenzie, C., Keith, M., & Lockridge, A. (2005). Declining sex ratio in a First Nations community. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(10), 1295-1298.
Miller, E., & Smith, M. (2012). Dissemination and ownership of knowledge. In E-J. Milne, C. Mitchell & N. de Lange (Eds.), The handbook of participatory video (pp. 331-348). Lanham: Altamira Press.
Mouffe, C. (2005). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
Mullin, A. (2003). Feminist art and the political imagination. Hypatia, 18(4), 190-213.
National Energy Board (NEB) (2014). .Hearing Order OH-001-2014. Trans mountain pipeline ULC: Trans mountain expansion project. Volume 23: November 28th 2014. Victoria, BC.
Nyers, P. (2010). No one is illegal between city and nation. Studies in Social Justice, 4(2), 127-143.
Ochocka, J., & Janzen, R. (2014). Breathing life into theory: Illustrations of community-based research, hallmarks, functions and phases. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 7, 18-33.
Pain, R. (2004). Social geography: Participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 25(8), 652-663.
Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury.
Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. London: Verso.
Scott, D., & Smith, A. (2012). The green teens of Aamjiwnaang make the connection. Canadian Dimension, 6(1), 20.
Shaw, J. (2012). Interrogating the gap between the ideals and practice reality of participatory video. In E-J. Milne, C. Mitchell & N. de Lange (Eds.), The handbook of participatory video (pp. 225-241). Lanham: Altamira Press.
Shaw, K. (2008). Indigeneity and political theory: Sovereignty and the limits of the political. London: Rutledge.
Sontag, S. (1997). On photography. New York: Picador.
Sucharov, M. (2015, June 25). The ‘Sixties Scoop’ still ripples through Canadian families. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from: http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/index.php?p=4
Thomas, V., & Britton, K. (2012). The art of participatory video: Relational aesthetics in artistic collaborations. In E-J. Milne, C. Mitchell & N. de Lange (Eds.), The handbook of participatory video (pp. 208-222). Lanham: Altamira Press.
Tremblay, C., &. Jayme, B. (2015). Community knowledge co-creation through participatory video. Action Research, 13(3), 298-314.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). TRC Final Report. Retrieved from: http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/index.php?p=890
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
Wiebe, S., & Konsmo, E. (2014). Indigenous body as contaminated site? Examining reproductive justice in Aamjiwnaang. In F. Scala, S. Paterson & M. Sokolon (Eds.), Fertile ground: Exploring reproduction in Canada (pp. 325-358). Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University.
Wiebe, S., & Taylor, M. (2014). Pursuing excellence in collaborative community-campus research: 2014 CCCR national summit backgrounder. (Background paper prepared for the 2014 CCCR National Summit, November 3-4, 2014.) Community-Based Research Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.communitybasedresearch.ca/resources/677%20National%20Summit/Participant%20Backgrounder%20Oct%2029.compressed.pdf
Wiebe, S. (forthcoming). Everyday exposure: Indigenous mobilization and environmental justice in Canada’s chemical valley. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Yanow, D. (2003). Assessing local knowledge. In H.M.A. Wagenar (Ed.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 228-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.