Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“How does Sustainability Leadership Affect Firm Performance? The Choices Associated with Appointing a Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility”

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have seen a significant increase in stakeholder pressure on firms to be not only economically sustainable but also from an environmental and social perspective. Besides operational changes in practices and products companies have reacted toward this increased pressure from a strategic perspective through structural changes of their top management team (TMT). A recent addition to the TMT has been the appointment of the chief officer of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this paper, we take a behavioral perspective and investigate how the employment of a chief officer of CSR to the TMT impact on firm performance. Specifically, we explore how certain characteristics of the newly appointed chief executive of CSR impact on a firm’s financial performance. We collected secondary, longitudinal data of listed companies in the United States. Results indicate that appointing a chief executive of CSR does under certain conditions and characteristics result in financial performance benefits. Furthermore, the greatest financial performance benefits can be achieved if the appointee is female and has a CSR functional background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antle, R., & Smith, A. (1986). An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barskey, R., Kimball, M., Shapiro, M. (1996). Preference parameters and behavorial heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement survey. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper series, July (5667).

  • Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences In proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowcz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M. K. (1993). Organizational innovation and substandard performance: When is necessity the mother of innovation? Organization Science, 4(1), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. E., Chandy, R. K., & Cunha, M. (2010). When do chief marketing officers affect Ffrm value? A customer power explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1162–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, C. E., & Lewis, P. V. (1996). Correlation of gender-related values of independence and relationship and leadership orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1141–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.

  • Carter, E. E. (1971). The behavioral theory of the firm and top-level corporate decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). Examining the shareholders wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R., & Hill, S. D. (2010). Green matters? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(3), 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Executive succession: organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(2), 140–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dherment-Ferere, I., Renneboog, L. (2000). Share price reactions to CEO resignations and large shareholder monitoring in listed French companies. Discussion paper 2000-70, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Firm performance, Governance Structure, and top management turnover in a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1289–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. D., & Singh, H. (1989). CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 718–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, E. P., & Karan, V. (1994). Internal/external top management succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 7(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2006). Does hiring a new CFO change things? An investigation of changes in discretionary accruals. Accounting Review, 81(4), 781–809.

  • Graham, J. F., Stendardi, E. J., Myers, J. K., & Graham, M. (2002). Gender differences in investment strategies: an information processing perspective. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadalupe, M., Li, H., & Wulf, J. (2014). Who lives in the c-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science, 60(4), 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie Datta, J. P. D. K. (1997). Contextual influences on executive selection: Firm characteristics and CEO experience. Journal of Management Studies, 34(4), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmich, D. (1977). Executive succession in the corporate organization: A current integration. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 252–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K.B., Hora, M., Singhal, V.R. (2014). An empirical investigation on the appointments of supply chain and operations management executives. Management Science (article in press).

  • Hillestad, T., Xie, C., & Haugland, S. A. (2010). Innovative corporate social responsibility: The founder’s role in creating a trustworthy corporate brand through “green innovation”. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 19(6), 440–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, D. R. (1985). Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. C., & Boggs, D. J. (2003). Internationalization and performance: Traditional measures and their decomposition. Multinational Business Review, 11(3), 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huson, M. R., Parrino, R., & Starks, L. T. (2001). International monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. Journal of Finance, 56, 2265–2297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. L., & Schneider, S. C. (2010). Gender differences in leadership—believing is seeing: Implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(6), 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, M. P., Kathuria, R., & Porth, S. J. (2003). Alignment of strategic priorities and performance: An Integration of operations and strategic management perspectives. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.-K., & Shivdasani, A. (1996). Does the Japanese governance system enhance shareholder wealth? Evidence from the stock-price effects of top management turnover. Review of Financial Studies, 9(4), 1061–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R. A. (2005). Strategic marketing and the CMO, in marketing renaissance: Opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, A., Schläpfer, Y. (2010). Is a CEO turnover good or bad news? Working paper, Department of Finance, University of Basel.

  • Lee, P. M., & James, E. H. (2007). She’-e-os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. K. Y., Pagell, M., Dan, D., Wiengarten, F., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2014). OHSAS 18001 certification and operating performance: The role of complexity and coupling. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. K. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longsworth, A., Doran, H., & Webber, J. (2012). The sustainability executive: Profile and progress. London: PriecewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, J. J. (2009). Why top management team characteristics matter when Employing a chief operating officer: A strategic contingency perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, G. J., Court, D., Quelch, J. A., & Crawford, B. (2004). Bringing customers into the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 82, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menz, M. (2012). Functional top Management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(1), 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. (2001). On the choice and replacement of chief financial officers. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 143–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., Wiengarten, F., Lo, C.K.Y., Humphreys, P. (2014). For workers there is no risk paradox. Working paper, ESADE Business School.

  • Perrow, C. (1970). Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. In M. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations (pp. 59–89). Nashville: Vanderbild University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime, J., Jonsen, K., Carter, N., & Maznevski, M. L. (2008). Managers’ perceptions of women and men leaders: A cross cultural comparison. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(2), 171–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Gonzales-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental Practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin, N. E., & White, K. J. (1977). The Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors. Econometrica, 45(8), 1989–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. NewYork: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, K. B., & Menon, K. (1985). Executive succession in failing firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 680–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1972). Organizational theory: A structural and behavioral analysis. Homewoo: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W, Jr, & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Will succession planning increase shareholder wealth? Evidence from investor reactions to relay CEO successions. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2014). Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. D., & Mcfarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata, J. (2000). Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles. Journal of Psychology, 134(3), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1988). Selectivity and selective Perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 873–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinreb (2011). CSO back story: How chief sustainability officers reached the C-suite. Weinreb Group, September

  • Weinzimmer, L. G., Bond, E. U., Houston, M. B., & Nystrom, P. C. (2003). Relating marketing expertise on the top management team and strategic market agressiveness to financial performance and shareholder value. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11, 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten, F., & Pagell, M. (2012). The importance of quality management for the success of environmental management initiative. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, D. L., Wallace, N. D., III, & Glascock, J. L. (1993). Stockholder reactions to departures and appointments of key executives attributable to firings. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J. (1990). CEO Selection, succession, compensation and firm Performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E., & Westphal, J. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, D. (2004). Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the american firm. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESADE School of Business, Ramon Llull University, Av. de la Torre Blanca, 59, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Frank Wiengarten

  2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Chris K. Y. Lo & Jessie Y. K. Lam

Authors
  1. Frank Wiengarten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris K. Y. Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessie Y. K. Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Wiengarten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiengarten, F., Lo, C.K.Y. & Lam, J.Y.K. “How does Sustainability Leadership Affect Firm Performance? The Choices Associated with Appointing a Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility”. J Bus Ethics 140, 477–493 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2666-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2666-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation