Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:49:56.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Bacon, Hawthorne and Uzquiano

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Timothy Williamson*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, Andrew, Hawthorne, John, and Uzquiano, Gabriel. 2016: “Higher-order Free Logic and the Prior-Kaplan Paradox.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 493541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1995. “A Problem in Possible Worlds Semantics.” In Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Raffman, D., and Asher, N., 4152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. 1961. “On a Family of Paradoxes.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2: 1632. 10.1305/ndjfl/1093956750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 1998. “Indefinite Extensibility.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 55: 124. 10.5840/gps19985512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016. “Modal Science.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 453492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. forthcoming. “Semantic Paradoxes and Abductive Methodology.” In The Relevance of the Liar, edited by Armour-Garb, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar