Abstract
This paper argues that, if we are committed to a Pro-choice stance with regard to selective abortion for disability, we will be unable to justify the prohibition of sex-selective abortion (SSA), for two reasons. First, familiar Pro-choice arguments in favour of a woman’s right to select against fetal impairment also support, by parity of reasoning, a right to choose SSA. Second, rejection of the criticisms of selective abortion for disability levelled by disability theorists also disposes, by implication, of the key objections to SSA, as developed, most notably, by feminists. The paper, then, consists of a conditional defence of SSA, under which SSA should be available, and protected by a right, if selective abortion for disability is. Opponents of SSA might respond by conceding additional restrictions on selection against disabled fetuses. It should become clear throughout the paper, however, that any such new restrictions would be unacceptably onerous for women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arora, D., ‘The Victimising Discourse: Sex-Determination Technologies and Policy’, Economic and Political Weekly, 17 February (1996): 420–424.
Asch, A., ‘Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible?’, Florida State University Law Review 30 (2003): 315–342.
Asch, A., and Wasserman, D., ‘Where is the Sin in Synecdoche?’ In Wasserman, D., Bickenbach, J., and Wachbroit, R. (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 172–216.
Bubeck, D., ‘Sex Selection: The Feminist Response’. In Burley, J., and Harris, J. (eds.), A Companion to Genethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), pp. 216–228.
Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Daniels, N., and Wikler, D., From Chance to Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Chambers, C., ‘Autonomy and Equality in Cultural Perspective: Response to Sawitri Saharso’, Feminist Theory 5 (2004): 329–332.
Corea, G., The Mother Machine (London: Women’s Press, 1985).
Dworkin, R., Life’s Dominion (New York: Vintage Books, 1994).
Efrat, Z., Perri, T., Ramati, E., Tugendreich, D., and Meizner, I., ‘Fetal Gender Assignment by First-Trimester Ultrasound’, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 27 (2006): 619–621.
Enoch, D., ‘A Right to Violate One’s Duty’, Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 335–394.
Every Disabled Child Matters (EDCM), Disabled Children and Child Poverty (London: EDCM, 2007).
Goodkind, D., ‘On Substituting Sex Preference Strategies in East Asia: Does Prenatal Sex Selection Reduce Postnatal Discrimination?’, Population and Development Review 22 (1996): 111–125.
Hanmer, J., and Allen, S., ‘Reproductive Engineering: The Final Solution’, Gender Issues 2 (1982): 53–74.
Jackson, E., Regulating Reproduction (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).
Jones, P., ‘Group Rights and Group Oppression’, Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999): 353–377.
Kamm, F. M., Intricate Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Kukathas, C., ‘Genocide and Group Rights’, unpublished ms.
McMahan, J., The Ethics of Killing (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
McMahan, J., ‘Causing Disabled People to Exist, and Causing People to be Disabled’, Ethics 116 (2005a): 77–99.
McMahan, J., Preventing the Existence of People with Disabilities. In Wasserman, D., Bickenbach, J., and Wachbroit, R. (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005b) pp. 142–171.
Overall, C., Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis (Boston, PA: Allen and Unwin, 1987).
Parens, E., and Asch, A., ‘The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Testing: Reflections and Recommendations’. In Parens, E., and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000), pp. 3–43.
Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
Saharso, S., ‘SSA: Gender, Culture and Dutch Public Policy’, Ethnicities 5 (2005): 248–281.
Savulescu, J., ‘Sex Selection: The Case For’. In Kuhse, H., and Singer, P. (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 145–149.
Saxton, M., ‘Why Members of the Disability Community Oppose Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion’. In Parens, E., and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000), pp. 147–164.
Shakespeare, T., ‘The Social Context of Individual Choice’. In Wasserman, D., Bickenbach, J., and Wachbroit, R. (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 217–236.
Steinbacher, R., ‘Sex Preselection: From Here to Fraternity’. In Gould, C. (ed.), Beyond Domination (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1984), pp. 274–282.
Steinbock, B., Life Before Birth (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Steinbock, B., ‘Disability, Prenatal Testing, and Selective Abortion’. In Parens, E., and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000), pp. 108–123.
The Economist, ‘Gendercide: The Worldwide War on Baby Girls’, 4 March 2010.
Thomson, J. J., ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1971): 47–66.
Tomlinson, S., ‘Genetic Testing for Cystic Fibrosis: A Personal Perspective’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 11 (1998): 551–564.
United Nations Population Fund (UNFP), Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994 (New York: United Nations, 1995).
Visaria, L., Ramachandran, V., Ganatra, B., and Kalyanwala, S., ‘Abortion in India: Emerging Issues from Qualitative Studies’, Economic and Political Weekly 39 (2004): 5044–5052.
Waldron, J., ‘A Right to do Wrong’, Ethics 92 (1981): 21–39.
Warren, M. A., Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1985).
Warren, M. A., ‘Sex Selection: Individual Choice or Cultural Coercion?’ In Kuhse, H., and Singer, P. (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (1st ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 137–142.
Wasserman, D., ‘A Choice of Evils in Prenatal Testing’, Florida State University Law Review 30 (2003): 295–313.
Wertheimer, A., Coercion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).
Wertheimer, A., Consent to Sexual Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Wertz, D. C., and Fletcher, J. C., ‘Sex Selection Through Prenatal Diagnosis: A Feminist Critique’. In Holms, H. B., and Purdy, L. M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1992), pp. 240–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, J. Sex-Selective Abortion: A Matter of Choice. Law and Philos 31, 125–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-011-9118-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-011-9118-x