Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wittgensteinian Accounts of Moorean Absurdity

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Baldwin, T. (1990): G. E. Moore, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. (1993): ‘Inescapable Surprises and Acquirable Intentions’, Analysis 53, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombay, A. (1988): ‘Some Paradoxes of Counterprivacy’, Philosophy 63, 191– 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. (1994): ‘Moore's Paradox: A Wittgensteinian Approach’, Mind 103, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1962): Knowledge and Belief, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1975): ‘Pragmatics in Natural Language’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, 256–276, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, K. and Ring, M. (1991): ‘Moore's Paradox Revisited’, Synthese 87, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N. (1984): Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1942): ‘A Reply to My Critics’, in P. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, 535–677, Evanston: Tudor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1944): ‘Russell's Theory of Descriptions’, in P. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, 175–225, Evanston: Tudor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1983): Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, R. A. (1988): Blindspots, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1979): ‘Moore's Paradox – One or Two?’, Analysis 39, 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1982a): ‘Believing the Self-Contradictory’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1982b): ‘The Absurdities of Moore's Paradoxes’, Theoria 48, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1994): ‘Moorean Absurdity and the Intentional ‘structure’ of Assertion’, Analysis 54, 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1996): ‘Moorean Absurdities and the Nature of Assertion’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953): Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1974): Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore, G. H. von Wright (ed.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980a): Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I, G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980b): Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, G. H. vonWright and H. Hyman (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 0511, Singapore

    John N. Williams

Authors
  1. John N. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, J.N. Wittgensteinian Accounts of Moorean Absurdity. Philosophical Studies 92, 283–306 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004260008644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004260008644

Keywords

Search

Navigation