Skip to main content
Log in

August Weismann on Germ-Plasm Variation

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

August Weismann is famous for having argued against the inheritance of acquired characters. However, an analysis of his work indicates that Weismann always held that changes in external conditions, acting during development, were the necessary causes of variation in the hereditary material. For much of his career he held that acquired germ-plasm variation was inherited. An irony, which is in tension with much of the standard twentieth-century history of biology, thus exists – Weismann was not a Weismannian. I distinguish three claims regarding the germ-plasm: (1) its continuity,(2) its morphological sequestration, and (3) its variational sequestration. With respect to changes in Weismann's views on the cause of variation, I divide his career into four stages. For each stage I analyze his beliefs on the relative importance of changes in external conditions and sexual reproduction as causes ofvariation in the hereditary material. Weismann believed, and Weismannism denies, that variation, heredity, and development were deeply intertwined processes. This article is part of a larger project comparing commitments regarding variation during the latter half of the nineteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Garland E. 1978. Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1985. “Heredity under an Embryological Paradigm: The Case of Genetics and Embryology.” The Biological Bulletin 168 (suppl.): 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, Alice and Farley, John. 1979. “Mendel and Meiosis.” Journal of the History of Biology 12: 137–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, N.J. and Liu, C.K. 1948. “Germplasm, Weismann, and Hydrozoa.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 23: 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacher, L.I. 1982. The Problem of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters. A History of a priori and Empirical Methods Used to Find a Solution. Translated by Frederick Churchill and others. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1979. “Theodor Eimer and Orthogenesis: Evolution by 'Definitely Directed Variation.' ” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 34: 40–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, Leo W. 1987. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1968. “August Weismann and a Break from Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 1: 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –– 1970. “Hertwig, Weismann, and the Meaning of Reduction Division Circa 1890.” Isis 61: 429–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –– 1976. “Rudolf Virchow and the Pathologist's Criteria for the Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 31: 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1978. “The Weismann-Spencer Controversy over the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” E. G. Forbes (ed.), Human Implications of Scientific Advance (Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of the History of Science, Edinburgh 10–19 August 1977). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1980. “The Modern Evolutionary Synthesis and the Biogenetic Law.” Ernst Mayr and William B. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis. Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1985. “Weismann's Continuity of the Germ-Plasm in Historical Perspective.” Klaus Sander (ed.), August Weismann (1834–1914) und die theoretische Biologie des 19 Jahrhuderts. (Urkunden, Berichte und Analysen). Feiburger Universitätsblätter 87/88. Freiburg: Rombach Verlag, pp. 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1986. “Weismann, Hydromedusae, and the Biogenetic Imperative: A Reconsideration.” T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowsky and C. C. Wylie (eds.), A History of Embryology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1987. “From Heredity Theory to Vererbung. The Transmission Problem, 1850–1915.” Isis 78: 337–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1999. “August Weismann: A Developmental Evolutionist.” Frederick B. Churchill and Helmut Risler (eds.), August Weismann. Ausgewählte Briefe und Dokumente (Selected Letters and Documents), vol. 2. Freiburg i. Br.: Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg i. Br., pp. 749–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– In prep. “August Weismann in a Mendelian World.” Presented at the 1999 Meetings of the History of Science Society in Pittsburgh, USA, November 3–7, 1999.

  • Churchill, Frederick B. and Risler, H. 1999. August Weismann. Ausgewählte Briefe und Dokumente (Selected Letters and Documents), 2 vols. Freiburg i. Br.: Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg i. Br.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, William. 1965. “Cell, Nucleus, and Inheritance: An Historical Study.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109: 124–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles R. 1964. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859), 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, 1st edn., 2 vols. New York: Orange Judd & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, John. 1982. Gametes & Spores. Ideas about Sexual Reproduction 1750–1914. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Elihu M. 1998. “The American System of Research: Evolutionary Biology, 1890– 1950.” Sociology Dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Gliboff, Sander. 2001. “The Pebble and the Planet: Paul Kammerer, Ernst Haeckel, and the Meaning of Darwinism.” History of Science Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1977. “Eternal Metaphors of Palaentology.” Anthony Hallam (ed.), Patterns of Evolution as Illustrated by the Fossil Record. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, Theodore J. 1986. “Variation, Heredity, and Scientific Explanation in the Evolutionary Theories of Four American Neo-Lamarckians, 1867–1897.” History of Science Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Griesemer, James R. 2000a. “Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance.” Philosophy of Science 67: S348–S368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –– 2000b. “Reproduction and the Reduction of Genetics.” Peter J. Beurton, Raphael Falk, Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer, James R. and Wimsatt, William C. 1989. “Picturing Weismannism: A Case Study of Conceptual Evolution.” Michael Ruse (ed.), What Philosophy of Biology Is. Essays dedicated to David Hull. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 75–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer. AUGUST WEISMANN ON GERM-PLASM VARIATION 553

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893. “Zur Phylogenie der australischen Fauna: Systematische Einleitung.” R.W. Semon (ed.), Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien und dem Malayischen Archipel. Jena: Gustav Fischer, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1990. The Causes of Evolution (1932). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, Marcus. October 29, 1891 (letter dated October 12, 1891). “A Difficulty in Weismannism.” Nature 44: 613–614.

  • –– December 3, 1891 (letter dated November 28, 1891). Untitled. Nature 45: 102–103.

  • –– May 11, 1893 (letter dated May 1, 1893). “A Difficulty in Weismannism Resolved.” Nature 48: 28–29.

  • –– 1893. “The Spencer-Weismann Controversy.” Contemporary Review 64: 54–59.

  • Hodge, M.J.S. 1989. “Generation and the Origin of Species (1837–1937): A Historiographical Suggestion.” British Journal for the History of Science 22: 267–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J. 1995. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Timothy D. 1995. “The Influence of Weismann's Germ-Plasm Theory on the Distinction Between Learned and Innate Behavior.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 31: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, Jane. 1987. “Heredity/Development in the United States, Circa 1900.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John. 1989. “Weismann and Modern Biology.” Paul H. Harvey and Linda Partridge (eds.), Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol. 6. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1985. “Weismann and Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 18: 295–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Thomas H. 1926. The Theory of the Gene. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1932. “The Rise of Genetics.” Science 76: 261–267, 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert C. 1966. Origins of Mendelism. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan. 2000. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, 2nd edition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, Rudolf A. 1996. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Jason S., Hall, Brian K. and Olson, Wendy M. 2001. “Bridging the Gap Between Developmental Systems Theory and Evolutionary Developmental Biology.” BioEssays 23: 954–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Gloria. 1979. A Prelude to Genetics. Theories of a Material Substance of Heredity: Darwin to Weismann. Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, George J. 1893a. An Examination of Weismannism. Chicago: Open Court Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893b. “Mr. Herbert Spencer on ‘Natural Selection’.” Contemporary Review 63: 499–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893c. “The Spencer-Weismann Controversy.” Contemporary Review 64: 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893d. “A Note on Panmixia.” Contemporary Review 64: 611–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Charles E. 1997. No Other Gods. On Science and American Social Thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, Sahotra. 1991. “Lamarck contre Darwin, Reduction versus Statistics: Conceptual Issues in the Controversy over Directed Mutagenesis in Bacteria.” Alfred I. Tauber (ed.), Organism and the Origins of Self. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 235–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1893a. “The Inadequacy of ‘Natural’ Selection.” Contemporary Review 63: 153–166, 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893b. “Professor Weismann's Theories.” Contemporary Review 63: 743–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893c. “The Spencer-Weismann Controversy.” Contemporary Review 64: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893d. “A Rejoinder to Professor Weismann.” Contemporary Review 64: 893–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1894. “Weismannism Once More.” Contemporary Review 66: 592–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1895. “Heredity Once More.” Contemporary Review 68: 608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, Albert H. December 3, 1891 (letter dated November 14, 1891). “A Difficulty in Weismannism.” Nature 45: 102.

  • Wagner, Günter P., Chiu, Chi-Hua and Laubichler, Manfred D. 2000. “Developmental Evolution as a Mechanistic Science: The Inference from Developmental Mechanisms to Evolutionary Processes.” American Zoologist 40: 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. and Goodwin, B. C. 1982. “The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5: 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, August. 1875–1876. Studien zur Descendenz-Theorie, 2 vols. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1882. Studies in the Theory of Descent, 2 vols. Edited and translated by R. Meldola. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle, & Rivington.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1890a. “Prof. Weismann's Theory of Heredity.” Nature 41: 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a. Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1. E.B. Poulton, S. Schönland and A.E. Shipley (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1883 essay). “On Heredity.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 67–106. Translated by A. E. Shipley. [Original: 1883. Ñber die Vererbung. Jena: Gustav Fisher.], pp. 67–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1885 essay). “The Continuity of the Germ-Plasm as the Foundation of a Theory of Heredity.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 163–255. Translated by S. Schönland. [Original: 1885. Die Continuität des Keimplasmas als Grundlage einer Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: Gustav Fischer.], pp. 163–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1886 essay). “The Significance of Sexual Reproduction in the Theory of Natural Selection.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 257–342. Translated by S. Schönland. [Original: 1886. Die Bedeutung der sexuellen Fortpflanzung für die Selektionstheorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.], pp. 257–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1887 essay). “On the Number of Polar Bodies and their Significance in Heredity.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 343–396. Translated by S. Schönland. [Original: 1887. Ñber die Zahl der Richtungskörper und über ihre Bedeutung für die Vererbung. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1888 essay). “On the Supposed Botanical Proofs of the Transmission of Acquired Characters.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 397–430. Translated by S. Schönland. [Original: 1888. “Vermeintliche botanische Beweise für eine Vererbung erworbener Eigenschaften.” Biologisches Centralblatt 8: 65–79, 97–109.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891a (1889 essay). “The Supposed Transmission of Mutilations.” In Essays Upon Heredity And Kindred Problems, vol. 1, pp. 431–461. Translated by S. Schöland.[Original: 1889. Ñber die Hypothese einer Vererbung von Verletzungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.], pp. 431–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1891b. Amphimixis oder die Vermischung der Individuen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1892a. Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 2. E.B. Poulton and A.E. Shipley (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. AUGUST WEISMANN ON GERM-PLASM VARIATION 555

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1892a (1890 essay). “Remarks on Certain Problems of the Day.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 2, pp. 71–97. Translated by A.E. Shipley [Original: 1890b. “Bemerkungen zu einigen Tages-Problemen.” Bioligisches Centralbatt 10: 1–12, 33–44].

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1892a (1891 essay). “Amphimixis or the Essential Meaning of Conjugation and Sexual Reproduction.” In Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Problems, vol. 2, pp. 99–222. Translated by the editors and others. [Original: 1891b. Amphimixis oder die Vermischung der Individuen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.].

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1892b. Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Verebung. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1892c. Aufsätze über Vererbung und verwandte biologische Fragen. Jena: Gustav Fischer. [Contains, in German, all the essays from 1891a and 1892a.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893a. The Germ-Plasm: A Theory of Heredity. Translated by W. N. Parker and H. Rönnfeldt. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1893b. “The All-Sufficiency of Natural Selection. A Reply to Herbert Spencer.” Contemporary Review 64: 309–338, 596–610. [Original: 1893c. Die Allmacht der Naturzüchtung. Eine Erwiderung an Herbert Spencer. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1894a. The Effect of External Influences Upon Development. The Romanes Lecture. London: Henry Frowde.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1894b. Äussere Einflüsse als Entwicklungsreize. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1895a. “Heredity Once More.” Contemporary Review 68: 420–456. [Original: 1895b. Neue Gedanken zur Vererbungsfrage. Eine Antwort an Herbert Spencer. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1896a. “New Experiments on the Seasonal Dimorphism of Lepidoptera.” The Entomologist 29: 29–39, 74–80, 103–113, 153–157, 173–185, 202–208, 240–252. [Original: 1895c. “Neue Versuche zum Saison-Dimorphismus der Schmetterlinge.” Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 8: 611–684.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1896b (1902). On Germinal Selection as a Source of Definite Variation. Chicago: Open Court Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1896c. Ñber Germinal-Selection eine Quelle bestimmt gerichteter Variation. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1904a. The Evolution Theory, 2nd edn., 2 vols. Translated by J. A. Thomson and M. R. Thomson. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1904b. Vorträge über Deszendenztheorie, 2nd edn., 2 vols. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1909a. “The Selection Theory.” In Evolution in Modern Thought, Modern Library. New York: Boni and Liverwright, pp. 23–86. [Original: 1909b. Die Selektionstheorie. Eine Untersuchung. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]

    Google Scholar 

  • –– 1913. Vorträge über Deszendenztheorie, 3rd edn., 2 vols. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edmund B. 1925. The Cell in Development and Heredity, 3rd edn. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, William C. 1974. “Complexity and Organization.” K. F. Schaffner and R. S. Cohen (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association 1972, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, pp. 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, Rasmus G. 2000. “Darwin on Variation and Heredity.” Journal of the History of Biology 33: 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –– 2001. “Varieties of Modules: Kinds, Levels, Origins and Behaviors.” Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 291: 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –– 2002 in press. “Evolutionary Developmental Biology Meets Levels of Selection: Modular Integration or Competition, or Both?” Werner Callebaut and Diego Rasskin-Gutman (eds.), Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Complex Natural Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winther, R.G. August Weismann on Germ-Plasm Variation. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 517–555 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012950826540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012950826540

Navigation