Abstract
This article understands codes of ethics as written documents that represent social actors in specific ways through the use of language. It presents an empirical study that investigated the codes of ethics of the German Dax30 companies. The study adopted a critical discourse analysis-approach in order to reveal how the code-texts produce a particular understanding of the various internal social groups for the readers. Language is regarded as social practice that functions at creating particular understandings of individuals and groups, how they are interrelated, and how they should behave. Findings show that codes of ethics do not represent employees as a group that is empowered or morally enlightened; instead they are positioned as passive receivers of rules and regulations. Furthermore, codes of ethics classify employees as having a need to be monitored and controlled by the higher levels of the corporate hierarchy. Overall, code language enforces compliance through maintaining existing and building new asymmetries between the different groups within a company. As a consequence, the article discusses a somewhat different understanding of code effectiveness. Reproducing and reemphasizing hierarchical relations could also lead to code compliance, perhaps without any need for developing the moral employee that is committed to ethical values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth S. and C. Hardy: 2004, ‘Discourse and identities’, in D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, (Sage, London), pp. 153-174.
Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott: 1992, Critical Management Studies. (Sage, London).
Cassell, C., P. Johnson and K. Smith: 1997, ‘Opening the black box: Corporate codes of ethics in their organisational context’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(10), 1077-1093.
Fairclough, N.: 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis, (Longman, London).
Fairclough, N.: 2001, Language and Power, (Longman, Harlow).
Fairclough, N.: 2003, Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research, (Routledge, London and New York).
Fairclough, N. and Wodak R: 1997, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2 (Sage, London), pp. 258–284.
Farrell, B. J. and D. M. Cobbin: 2000, ‘A content analysis of codes of ethics from fifty-seven national accounting organisations’, Business Ethics: A European Review 9(3), 180-190.
Farrell, H. and B. J. Farrell: 1998, ‘The language of business codes of ethics: Implications of knowledge and power’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 587-601.
Ferguson, C.: 1998, ‘A Review of UK Company Codes of Conduct’, Report Commissioned by Social Development Division, Department for International Development (DFID), UK, received from: http://www.eldis.org.
Fisher, C.: 2001, ‘Managers’ perceptions of ethical codes: Dialectics and dynamics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(2), 145-156.
Foucault, M.: 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language, (Tavistok Publications Ltd., London).
Garcia, P. and C. Hardy: 2007: ‘Positioning, similarity and difference. Narratives of individual and organizational identities in an Australian university’, Scandinavian Journal of Management 23(4), 363-383.
Hall, S.: 1997, ‘Representation, meaning and language’, in S. Hall (ed.), Representation, Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, (Sage, Thousand Oaks), pp. 15-30.
Helin, S. and J. Sandström: 2007, ‘An inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(3), 253-271.
Jensen, T., J. Sandström and S. Helin: 2009, ‘Corporate codes of ethics and the bending of moral space’, Organization 16(4), 529-545.
Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‘Business codes of multinational firms. What do they say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13-31.
Kaptein, M. and M. Schwartz: 2008, ‘The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 111-127.
Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 2002, The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Kjonstad, B. and H. Willmott: 1995, ‘Business ethics: Restrictive or empowering?’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(6), 445-464.
Koivunen, N.: 2007, ‘The processual nature of leadership discourses’, The Scandinavian Journal of Management 23(3), 285-305.
Kress, G.: 1996, ‘Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society’, in C. A. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Text and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, (Routledge, London), pp. 15-31.
Langlois, C. C. and B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‘Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States’, Journal of International Business Studies 21(4), 519-539.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba; 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
MacLure, M.: 2003, Discourse in educational and social research, (Open University Press, Buckingham).
Norberg, P.: 2009, ‘“I don’t care that people don’t like what I do” – Business codes viewed as invisible or visible restrictions’, Journal of Business Ethics 86(2), 211-225.
Pelfrey, S. and E. Peacock: 1991, ‘Ethical codes of conduct are improving’, Business Forum 16(2), 14-17.
Quinn, R. E., H. W. Hildebrandt, P. Rogers and M. P. Thompson: 1991, `A Competing Values Framework for Analyzing Presentational Communication in Management Contexts', The Journal of Business Communication 28(3), 213–231
Schwartz, M. S.: 2004, ‘Effective corporate codes of ethics: Perceptions of code users’, Journal of Business Ethics 55(4), 323-343.
Sheridan, A.: 1980, Michel Foucault: The will to truth, (Tavistock, London and New York).
Stevens, B.: 1994, ‘An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?”‘, Journal of Business Ethics 13(1), 63-69.
Stevens, B.: 1996, ‘Using the competing values framework to assess corporate ethical codes’, The Journal of Business Communication 33(1), 71-84.
Stevens, B.: 2008, ‘Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(4), 601-609.
Strauss, A. and J. Corbin: 1990, Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques, (Sage, London).
Van Dijk, T. A.: 1996, ‘Discourse, power and access’, in C. A. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Text and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, (Routledge, London), pp. 84-106.
Van Leeuwen, T.: 2008, ‘Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Weaver, G. R.: 1995, ‘Does ethic code design matter? Effects of ethics code rationales and sanctions on recipients’ justice perceptions and content recall’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(5), 367-385.
Willmott, H.: 1998, ‘Towards a new ethics? The contributions of poststructuralism and posthumanism’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics & Organizations, (Sage, London), pp. 76-121.
Winkler, I.: 2009, ‘Stakeholder Salience in Corporate Codes of Ethics. Using Legitimacy, Power and Urgency to Explain Stakeholder Relevance in Ethical Codes of the German Blue Chips’, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies (ejbo) 14(1), 4-13.
Wodak, R.: 2001, `What is CDA About – a Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and It Developments', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Sage, London), pp. 1–13
Wood, G. and M. Rimmer: 2003, ‘Codes of ethics: What are they really and what should they be?’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 16(2), 181-195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winkler, I. The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors. J Bus Ethics 101, 653–665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0762-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0762-8