Skip to main content
Log in

The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article understands codes of ethics as written documents that represent social actors in specific ways through the use of language. It presents an empirical study that investigated the codes of ethics of the German Dax30 companies. The study adopted a critical discourse analysis-approach in order to reveal how the code-texts produce a particular understanding of the various internal social groups for the readers. Language is regarded as social practice that functions at creating particular understandings of individuals and groups, how they are interrelated, and how they should behave. Findings show that codes of ethics do not represent employees as a group that is empowered or morally enlightened; instead they are positioned as passive receivers of rules and regulations. Furthermore, codes of ethics classify employees as having a need to be monitored and controlled by the higher levels of the corporate hierarchy. Overall, code language enforces compliance through maintaining existing and building new asymmetries between the different groups within a company. As a consequence, the article discusses a somewhat different understanding of code effectiveness. Reproducing and reemphasizing hierarchical relations could also lead to code compliance, perhaps without any need for developing the moral employee that is committed to ethical values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth S. and C. Hardy: 2004, ‘Discourse and identities’, in D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, (Sage, London), pp. 153-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott: 1992, Critical Management Studies. (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., P. Johnson and K. Smith: 1997, ‘Opening the black box: Corporate codes of ethics in their organisational context’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(10), 1077-1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.: 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis, (Longman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.: 2001, Language and Power, (Longman, Harlow).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.: 2003, Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research, (Routledge, London and New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. and Wodak R: 1997, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2 (Sage, London), pp. 258–284.

  • Farrell, B. J. and D. M. Cobbin: 2000, ‘A content analysis of codes of ethics from fifty-seven national accounting organisations’, Business Ethics: A European Review 9(3), 180-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H. and B. J. Farrell: 1998, ‘The language of business codes of ethics: Implications of knowledge and power’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 587-601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.: 1998, ‘A Review of UK Company Codes of Conduct’, Report Commissioned by Social Development Division, Department for International Development (DFID), UK, received from: http://www.eldis.org.

  • Fisher, C.: 2001, ‘Managers’ perceptions of ethical codes: Dialectics and dynamics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(2), 145-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language, (Tavistok Publications Ltd., London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P. and C. Hardy: 2007: ‘Positioning, similarity and difference. Narratives of individual and organizational identities in an Australian university’, Scandinavian Journal of Management 23(4), 363-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S.: 1997, ‘Representation, meaning and language’, in S. Hall (ed.), Representation, Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, (Sage, Thousand Oaks), pp. 15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helin, S. and J. Sandström: 2007, ‘An inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(3), 253-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T., J. Sandström and S. Helin: 2009, ‘Corporate codes of ethics and the bending of moral space’, Organization 16(4), 529-545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‘Business codes of multinational firms. What do they say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and M. Schwartz: 2008, ‘The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 111-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 2002, The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjonstad, B. and H. Willmott: 1995, ‘Business ethics: Restrictive or empowering?’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(6), 445-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivunen, N.: 2007, ‘The processual nature of leadership discourses’, The Scandinavian Journal of Management 23(3), 285-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G.: 1996, ‘Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society’, in C. A. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Text and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, (Routledge, London), pp. 15-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, C. C. and B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‘Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States’, Journal of International Business Studies 21(4), 519-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba; 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M.: 2003, Discourse in educational and social research, (Open University Press, Buckingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, P.: 2009, ‘“I don’t care that people don’t like what I do” – Business codes viewed as invisible or visible restrictions’, Journal of Business Ethics 86(2), 211-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelfrey, S. and E. Peacock: 1991, ‘Ethical codes of conduct are improving’, Business Forum 16(2), 14-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., H. W. Hildebrandt, P. Rogers and M. P. Thompson: 1991, `A Competing Values Framework for Analyzing Presentational Communication in Management Contexts', The Journal of Business Communication 28(3), 213–231

  • Schwartz, M. S.: 2004, ‘Effective corporate codes of ethics: Perceptions of code users’, Journal of Business Ethics 55(4), 323-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A.: 1980, Michel Foucault: The will to truth, (Tavistock, London and New York).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 1994, ‘An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?”‘, Journal of Business Ethics 13(1), 63-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 1996, ‘Using the competing values framework to assess corporate ethical codes’, The Journal of Business Communication 33(1), 71-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 2008, ‘Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(4), 601-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and J. Corbin: 1990, Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques, (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A.: 1996, ‘Discourse, power and access’, in C. A. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Text and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, (Routledge, London), pp. 84-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T.: 2008, ‘Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R.: 1995, ‘Does ethic code design matter? Effects of ethics code rationales and sanctions on recipients’ justice perceptions and content recall’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(5), 367-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1998, ‘Towards a new ethics? The contributions of poststructuralism and posthumanism’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics & Organizations, (Sage, London), pp. 76-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, I.: 2009, ‘Stakeholder Salience in Corporate Codes of Ethics. Using Legitimacy, Power and Urgency to Explain Stakeholder Relevance in Ethical Codes of the German Blue Chips’, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies (ejbo) 14(1), 4-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R.: 2001, `What is CDA About – a Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and It Developments', in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Sage, London), pp. 1–13

  • Wood, G. and M. Rimmer: 2003, ‘Codes of ethics: What are they really and what should they be?’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 16(2), 181-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Winkler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, I. The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors. J Bus Ethics 101, 653–665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0762-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0762-8

Key words

Navigation