Skip to main content
Log in

Academics and entrepreneurs: Factors affecting the quality and utility of government-sponsored research

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge in Society

Abstract

Evaluations of the factors contributing to the quality and utility of sponsored research have indicated that characteristics of the researchers and funding arrangements tend to explain differences among projects. This article examines the validity of assumptions about the effects of organizational environment, funding level, and project duration on the outcome of funded research. The results of this study suggest a need to reexamine ideas about the determinants of research quality and utility, and implications for managers of research studies are drawn from the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, M.A. (1978).The funding of social knowledge production and application. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, R.J. (1966).The politics of research. Washington, DC: The Public Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I.N. & Freeman, H.E. (1975).Academic and entrepreneurial research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H. (1968). The future growth of academic research. In H. Orlans (Ed.),Science policy and the university. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R.J. (1975).The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1983). Patterns of research use in private and public sectors.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4 (4), 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. & Marquis, S. (1966). Freedom, visibility of consequences, and scientific innovation.American Journal of Sociology, 72, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1985). Research influence in decision making to control and prevent violence.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 7(2), 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, J.D. (1983).Government by contract. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E.C. (1975)The missing link. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, C.V. (1959).American universities and federal research. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, W. (1962).Scientists in industry: Conflict and accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. (Ed.) (1979).Studies in the management of social R & D. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. (1977). Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.A response to understanding crime. Washington, DC.

  • National Science Foundation. (1987). Division of Science Resources Studies.Federal R&D funding by budget function, FY 86–88. Washington, DC.

  • Orlans, H. (1973).Contracting for knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The institutionalization of scientific investigation.The Science System. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1978).Utilization focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R.F. (1979).Translating evaluation into policy. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971).Communication of innovations (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., & Wright, S.R. (1979).Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., & Williams, W. (1972).Evaluating social programs, theory, practice and politics. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M.J. & Baron, C.H. (Eds.) (1980).The use, nonuse, and misuse of applied social research in the courts. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salasin, S.E., & Davis, H.R. (1978). Facilitating the utilization of evaluation: A rocky road. In I. Deardoff et al. (Eds.),Evaluation of Community Mental Health Services. Washington, DC: Department of Health Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, A.D. (1981). Underutilized research.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(2), 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (Ed.). (1978).The federal investment in knowledge of social problems (vol 1). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1982). Federal funding and policing research.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(3), 339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (1986).National Institute of Education’s procurement practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives. (1977, June 22–July 21).Federal role in criminal justice and crime research. Joint Hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary and the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Scientific Planning of the Committee on Science and Technology, 95th Congress, First Session. Washington, DC.

  • Weiss, C.H. (1972).Evaluation research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L. E. Lynn, Jr. (ed.),Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C.H. The Many Meanings of Utilization.Public Administration Review, Sept/Oct 1979, 426–431.

  • Weiss, C.H., & Bucuvalas, M.J. (1980).Social science research design and decision-making. New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.O. & Krislow, S. (Eds.). (1977).Understanding crime: An evaluation of the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J.S. (1983).Evaluation and effective public management. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorton, J., Dunn, D., & Feldt, J. (1986, April).Exploring the criteria used to evaluate public administration research: A social judgment analysis of academicians and practitioners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Anaheim, CA.

  • Williams, W. (1971).Social policy research and analysis. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1982).Review of departmental research. Unpublished memorandum submitted to Depty Atttorney General Edward C. Schmultz. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirt, J.G., Lieberman, A.J., & Levien, R.E. (1975).R & D management: Methods used by federal agencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. & Gwaltney, M.K. (1981). Knowledge utilization as a networking process.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 2(4), 555–580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Her research focuses on research utilization and issues relating to the public workforce. Dr. Wise also has worked as a consultant to the director of the National Institute of Justice from January, 1983 to August, 1984.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wise, L.R. Academics and entrepreneurs: Factors affecting the quality and utility of government-sponsored research. Knowledge in Society 1, 85 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177549

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177549

Keywords

Navigation