Opinion
Decision making, impulsivity and time perception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004Get rights and content

Time is an important dimension when individuals make decisions. Specifically, the time until a beneficial outcome can be received is viewed as a cost and is weighed against the benefits of the outcome. We propose that impulsive individuals experience time differently, that is with a higher cost. Impulsive subjects, therefore, overestimate the duration of time intervals and, as a consequence, discount the value of delayed rewards more strongly than do self-controlled individuals. The literature on time perception and impulsivity, however, is not clear cut and needs a better theoretical foundation. Here, we develop the theoretical background on concepts of time perception, which could lead to an empirically based notion of the association between an altered sense of time and impulsivity.

Introduction

The perception of time is a crucial factor when individuals have to make decisions and consider the outcomes associated with their choices. Rewards that are received sooner are often preferred over future rewards, that is the subjective value of an outcome is discounted as a function of the delay 1, 2. It is well known that impulsive subjects devalue temporally delayed rewards more strongly than do comparison subjects, and this behavior might be due to their altered sense of time. According to this hypothesis, impulsive individuals will opt for smaller and immediate rewards more often than for delayed but higher rewards because they estimate duration as being subjectively longer than do more self-controlled individuals. The perception of time as lasting too long is associated with too high of a cost, which leads to the selection of alternatives with more immediate outcomes (see Figure 1).

Several empirical studies pointing to a possible association among impulsivity, decision making and time perception have been conducted over the last few decades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. However, only recently has this notion been addressed in a more systematic way. Here, we develop a conceptual framework that can guide current and future research and might allow researchers to build a consistent theory framing impulsivity, decision making and the experience of time. We will point to some methodological factors that have to be controlled for to reach valid conclusions and to explain impulsive decision making in inter-temporal choices. First, findings will be reviewed on impulsive behavior in inter-temporal choices, particularly in delay-discounting tasks, which examine the influence of time on decision making. Second, cognitive models of time perception will be related to study results showing that impulsive subjects display an altered sense of subjective time. It will be argued that the association between time perception and mood states plays a fundamental role in interpreting these empirical results.

Section snippets

Decision making and impulsivity

Every day we have to decide between options that have immediate or delayed consequences. For instance, we might restrict our eating habits to reduce our body weight, thereby opting for a momentary loss of pleasure associated with food to gain the future benefits of better physical health and appearance. Similarly, a student might have to decide whether to go to a party tonight or to stay at home and study for an exam that is scheduled tomorrow (the possible later higher reward is here, of

Experimental tasks that probe time-interval production and estimation

Although it is not yet clear how time keeping is implemented in the brain 26, 27, 28, 29, several brain areas provide fundamental building blocks of an interval-timing system (a neural clock) for durations in the seconds range (see Box 2). Cognitive models, which assume that an internal clock with a pacemaker produces subjective time units [30], have been fairly successful in interpreting human time perception and animal timing behavior (see Figure 2). The subjective duration of time is defined

Conclusions

There is a considerable body of knowledge about the cognitive-processing mechanisms that guide the experience of duration 30, 49, 50. This knowledge can be brought to bear on understanding the mechanisms underlying impulsivity and self control in inter-temporal decisions [51]. Because the perception of time is strongly linked to our subjective well-being, the passage of time varies considerably depending on our emotional states. The feeling that time passes slowly seems to be a fair indicator

Acknowledgements

M.P. is supported by grants from NIDA (R01DA016663, R01DA018307) and by a VA Merit Grant. M.P. and M.W. are also funded by a grant from NIDA (1R03DA020687–01A1) and by a grant from the Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind (KIBM). The Max Kade Foundation who supported M.W. by a grant is also gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Virginie van Wassenhove and A.D. (Bud) Craig for many helpful comments.

References (66)

  • E. Pöppel

    A hierarchical model of temporal perception

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (1997)
  • M. Wittmann

    Impaired time perception and motor timing in stimulant-dependent subjects

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2007)
  • W.H. Meck

    Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (1996)
  • J. Monterosso et al.

    The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2007)
  • K. Doya

    Metalearning and neuromodulation

    Neural Netw.

    (2002)
  • D.L. Harrington

    Neural representation of interval encoding and decision making

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • M.S. Matell et al.

    Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • F.A. Kagerer

    Cortical involvement in temporal reproduction: evidence for differential roles of the hemispheres

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • S.C. Hinton et al.

    Frontal-striatal circuitry activated by human peak-interval timing in the supra-seconds range

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • S.C. Hinton

    Neural systems supporting timing and chronometric counting: an fMRI study

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • G. Ainslie

    Specious reward – behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1975)
  • K.N. Kirby

    Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls

    J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.

    (1999)
  • R.A. Barkley

    Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)

    J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.

    (2001)
  • W. Mischel

    Delay of gratification in children

    Science

    (1989)
  • P.G. Zimbardo et al.

    Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • D. Kahneman et al.

    Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk

    Econometrica

    (1979)
  • K.N. Kirby et al.

    Concave utility, transaction costs, and risk in measuring discounting of delayed rewards

    J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.

    (2003)
  • D. Laibson

    Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting

    Q. J. Econ.

    (1997)
  • G.J. Madden

    Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards

    Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (2003)
  • A. Bechara

    Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • T.S. Critchfield et al.

    At the crossroads of time and action: a temporal discounting primer for prospective memory researchers

  • J. McDonald

    Effects of THC on behavioral measures of impulsivity in humans

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2003)
  • M.T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña

    Comparison among various methods of assessment of impulsiveness

    Percept. Mot. Skills

    (1993)
  • Cited by (413)

    • How time flies: Time perception and intertemporal choice

      2024, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text