Scepticism about reflexive intentions refuted
The aim of this paper is to resist four arguments, originally developed by Mark Siebel, that seem to support scepticism about reflexive communicative intentions. I argue, first, that despite their complexity reflexive intentions are thinkable mental representations. To justify this claim, I offer an account of the cognitive mechanism that is capable of producing an intention whose content refers to the intention itself. Second, I claim that reflexive intentions can be individuated in terms of their contents. Third, I argue that the explanatory power of the theory of illocutionary reflexive intentions is not as limited as it would initially seem. Finally, I reject the suggestion that the conception of reflexive communicative intentions ascribes to a language user more cognitive abilities than he or she really has.
References
Austin, John L. Sense and Sensibilia, reconstructed from the manuscript notes by G. J. Warnock. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, "On Communicative intentions: A reply to Récanati." Mind & Language 2.2 (1987): 141-154, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1987.tb00112.x.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1987.tb00112.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. "Vision and Intentional Content." In John Searle And His Critics, edited by Ernest Lepore and Robert van Guick, 195-213. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Farmer, Ann K. and Robert M. Harnish. "Communicative reference with pronouns." In The Pragmatic Perspective. Selected Papers form the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, edited by Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi, 547-565. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1987.10.1075/pbcs.5.40farSearch in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Communicative reference: An inferential model." Conceptus 17.44 (1984): 20-41.Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Book review: Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances, by François Récanati. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. pp. x, 278." The Philosophical Review 50.2 (1991): 297-300, doi: 10.2307/2185308.10.2307/2185308Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Commitments and speech acts." Philosophica 75 (2005): 11-41.10.21825/philosophica.82209Search in Google Scholar
Harnish, Robert M. "Internalism and externalism in speech act theory." Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. Special Issue on Speech Actions, edited by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka & Maciej Witek 5.1 (2009; this volume), doi: 10.2478/v10016-009-0001-2.10.2478/v10016-009-0001-2Search in Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. "Biosemantics." The Journal of Philosophy 86.6 (1989): 281-297.10.2307/2027123Search in Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004, doi: 10.2307/2027123.10.2307/2027123Search in Google Scholar
Perry, John. Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Récanati, François. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Siebel, Mark. "Illocutionary acts and attitude expression." Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (2003): 351-366.10.1023/A:1024110814662Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. "Intention and convention in speech acts." The Philosophical Review 73.4 (1964): 439-460, doi: 10.2307/2183301.10.2307/2183301Search in Google Scholar
Szymura, Jerzy. Język, Mowa i Prawda w Perspektywie Fenomenologii Lingwistycznej J. L. Austina. [Language, Speech, and Truth in J.L. Austin's Linguistics Phenomenology Perspective] Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Gdańsk, Łódź: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 1982.Search in Google Scholar
Twardowski, Kazimierz. On the Content and Object of Presentations. A Psychological Investigation. Translated and with an introduction by Reinhardt Grossmann, Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977.10.1007/978-94-010-1050-4Search in Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej. "Searle, Burge and Intentional Content." In Experience and Analysis. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, volume XII, edited by Johann C. Marek and Maria E. Reicher. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
This content is open access.
