Abstract
This paper reconsiders some themes and arguments from my earlier paper “Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos.” That work is often considered to be part of a cluster of papers attacking “luck egalitarianism” on the grounds that insisting on luck egalitarianism’s standards of fairness undermines relations of mutual respect among citizens. While this is an accurate reading, the earlier paper did not make its motivations clear, and the current paper attempts to explain the reasons that led me to write the earlier paper, assesses the force of its arguments, and locates it in respect to work of Richard Arneson and Elizabeth Anderson. The paper concludes by bringing out what now appears to be the main message of the earlier paper: that the attempt to implement an “ideal” theory of equality can harm the very people that the theory is designed to help.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109: 287–337.
Aristotle, 1955. Nicomachean ethics. London: Penguin.
Arneson, R. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.
Arneson, R. 2000. Egalitarianism and the right to privacy. Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 91–119.
Brown, Alexander. 2009. Personal responsibility: Why it matters. London: Continuum.
Burnyeat, Myles. 1979. The virtues of Plato. New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1979/sep/27/the-virtues-of-plato/. Accessed on 27 September 1979.
Cohen, G.A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–944.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981a. What is equality? part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy And Public Affairs 10:185–246. Reprinted in R. Dworkin Sovereign virtue (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. What is equality? part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10:283–345. Reprinted in R. Dworkin Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and freedom, 177–189. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gomberg, Paul. 2007. How to make opportunity equal. London: Blackwell.
Hinton, Timothy. 2001. Must egalitarians choose between fairness and respect? Philosophy and Public Affairs 30:72–87.
Miller, David. 1994. Complex equality. In Pluralism, justice and equality, eds. David Miller and Michael Walzer, 197–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, D., and M. Walzer (eds.). 1994. Pluralism, justice and equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morris, William. 1884. How we live and how we might live. In Political writings of William Morris, ed. A .L. Morton, 134–158. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Norman, Richard. 1998. The social basis of equality. In Ideals of equality, ed. Andrew Mason. London: Blackwell.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rawls, John. 1971, 1999. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. What is egalitarianism? Philosophy & Public Affairs 31: 5–39.
Tawney, R.H. 1931. Equality. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. A defence of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 46–66.
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. London: Blackwell.
Wolff, Jonathan. 1998. Fairness, respect and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27: 97–122.
Wolff, Jonathan. 2004. Training, perfection and fairness. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 285–295.
Wolff, Jonathan. 2007. Equality: The recent history of an idea. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4: 125–136.
Wolff, Jonathan. 2010. Analytical political philosophy. In The oxford handbook to the history of analytical philosophy, ed. M. Beaney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, Jonathan, and Avner de-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolff, J. Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos Revisited. J Ethics 14, 335–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9085-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9085-8