Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T06:58:31.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wrong Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2020

Abstract

An atomistic model of society leads us to address injustices in terms of individual rights, but rights are curious possessions and don't always give the protection that's needed. Examples are patient's rights, children's rights and a fetus's right to life, all of which go wrong because they assume that the subjects are independent and autonomous. This assumption often fails. Rights work where people are in a position to press them; for others they give only a caricature of justice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Hospital Association. 1973. Hospitals 4(4). Repr. 1978: Contemporary issues in bioethics, eds. T. Beauchamp and L. Walters. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Butler, Samuel. 1927. Erewhon. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1982. Papers on non‐marketing decision‐making. Quoted in Margolis, J., Selfishness, altruism and rationality: A theory of social choice. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram. 1978. Rights and responsibilities of patients and physicians. In Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, eds. Beauchamp, T. and Walters, L.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram. 1982. Rights and responsibilities of patients and physicians. Repr. Contemporary issues in bioethics, 2nd edition, eds. Beauchamp, T. and Walters, L.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1979. The nature and value of rights. In Rights, ed. Lyons, D.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. The birth of the clinic. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A.M.New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1980. Free to choose. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1979. Are there any natural rights? In Rights, ed. Lyons, D.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Krieger, Linda and Cooney, Patricia. 1983. The Miller‐Wohl controversy: Equal treatment, positive action and the meaning of women's equality. Golden Gate University Law Review 13(3): 513577.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690. Second treatise on civil government.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. 1979. Rights, claimants, and beneficiaries. In Rights, ed. Lyons, D.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1963. Republic. Trans. Shorey, P., ed. Hamilton, H.Princeton: Princeton University Press. I, 341c‐342d.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1958. Justice as fairness. Philosophical Review 67(April).10.2307/2182612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1968. The social contract. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Warren, Mary Anne. 1979. On the moral and legal status of abortion. In Philosophy and women, eds. Bishop, S. and Weinzweig, M.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard. 1979. Rights, human rights, and racial discrimination. In Rights, ed. Lyons, D.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
White, Alan. 1983. Rights and claims. In Law, morality and rights, ed. Steward, M.A.Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. The blue & brown books. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On certainty. Trans. Paul, D. and Anscombe, G.E.M., eds. Anscombe, G.E.M. and Von Wright, G.H.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1980. Equality and the rights of women. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1983. Is reverse discrimination fair? In Law, morality and rights, ed. Stewart, M.A.Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar