Abstract
One version of the argument for design relies on the assumption that the apparent fine-tuning of the universe for the existence of life requires an explanation. I argue that the assumption is false. Philosophers who argue for the assumption usually appeal to analogies, such as the one in which a person was to draw a particular straw among a very large number of straws in order not to be killed. Philosophers on the other side appeal to analogies like the case of winning a lottery. I analyze the two analogies and explain why the lottery analogy is the right one to use. In the light of such an analysis, we can see that although the cosmic feature of being life-permitting is rare, it does not allow life-permitting possible universes to stand out because there are other rare cosmic features that other possible universes have.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davies P. (2007) Cosmic jackpot: Why our universe is just right for life. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Leslie J. (1989) Universes. Routledge, London
Mackie J.L. (1982) The miracles of theism: Arguments for and against the existence of God. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Parfit, D. (1992). The puzzle of reality: why does the universe exist? (Reprinted in Metaphysics: The big questions, pp. 418–427, by P. van Inwagen & D. W. Zimmerman, Eds., 1998, Oxford: Blackwell).
van Inwagen P. (2002) Metaphysics (2nd ed). Westview Press, Boulder
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, Wh. The cosmic lottery. Int J Philos Relig 66, 155–165 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9203-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9203-3