Abstract
This paper offers a novel interpretation of the nature and role of logical (logikôs) argumentation in Aristotle’s natural philosophy. In contrast to the standard domain interpretation, which makes logikôs argumentation the contrary of phusikôs, relying on principles drawn from outside the domain of natural science, I propose that the essential or defining feature of logikôs argumentation is the use of principles that are general relative to the question under investigation. My interpretation is developed and illustrated with a close textual analysis of Aristotle’s explanation of mule sterility in Generation of Animals II 8.
References
Barnes, J. 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 1987. “Definition and scientific method in Aristotle’s posterior analytics and Generation of animals.” In Gotthelf and Lennox (1987), 120–66.10.1017/CBO9780511552564.010Search in Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2009. “Two standards for inquiry in Aristotle’s de Caelo.” In New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, edited by A. Bowen, and C. Wildberg, 51–81. Leiden/Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004173767.i-326.15Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2001. Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1998. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2002. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019925673X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482519Search in Google Scholar
Falcon, A., and M. Leunissen. 2015. “Eulogos in natural scientific inquiry.” In Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, edited by D. Ebrey, 217–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295155.012Search in Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012. “Aristotle as scientist: a proper verdict.” In Teleology, First Principles and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology, 371–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287956.003.0016Search in Google Scholar
Groisard, J. 2017. “Hybridity and sterility in Aristotle’s generation of animals.” In Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide, edited by A. Falcon, and D. Lefebvre, 153–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316459386.010Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2014. Simplicius, On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 1.5-9, 5–9. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Hardie, R. P. and Gaye, R. K. (1984) (trans.) “Physics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by J. Barnes. Princeton.10.1515/9781400835843-010Search in Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1983. Physics Books III and IV. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. 2014. “Empirical Eulogôs argumentation in Aristotle’s Generation of animals III.10.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1): 25–38.10.1080/09608788.2013.876612Search in Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. 2016. “Justification ‘by argument’ in Aristotle’s natural science.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 117–58.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795797.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 1995. “Material and formal natures in Aristotle’s de partibus animalium.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 11, 217–40.10.1163/2213441795X00138Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2001. “Aristotelian problems.” In Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, 72–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.5840/ancientphil199414SpecialIssue77Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2010. “Aristotle’s natural science: the many and the one.” Apeiron 43 (2–3): 1–24.10.1515/APEIRON.2010.43.2-3.1Search in Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2015. “Aristotle’s posterior analytics and the aristotelian problemata.” In The Aristotelian Problemata Physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations, edited by R. Mayhew. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. and Falcon, A. 2015. “The Scientific Role of Eulogos in Aristotle’s Cael II 12.” In Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, edited by D. Ebrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295155.012Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. “Empirical research in Aristotle’s biology.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, edited by A. Gotthelf, and J. Lennox, 53–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552564.006Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. “Theories and practises of demonstration.” In Aristotelian Explorations, 38–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2011. “On Myles Burnyeat’s Map of metaphysics Zeta.” Ancient Philosophy 31: 161–202.10.5840/ancientphil20113119Search in Google Scholar
Mosquera, G. 1998. “L’interprétation de l’argument logikôs chez Aristote.” Études Classiques: 33–52.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (trans. & comm.) 1978. Aristotle’s De MotuAnimalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Platt, A. 1984. (trans.) “Generation of animals.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by J. Barnes. Princeton.10.1515/9781400835843-028Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2016. Aristotle. Hackett: Metaphysics.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2019. Aristotle: Generation of Animals & History of Animals I. Hackett: Parts of Animals I.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Vol. ii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00263632Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198141099.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Steinkrüger, P. 2018. “Aristotle on kind-crossing.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 107–58.10.1093/oso/9780198825128.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Zingano, M. 2017. “Ways of proving in Aristotle.” In Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition, edited by W. Wians, and R. Polansky, 7–49. Leiden/Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004340084_003Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
