Abstract
I argue that Locke’s distinction between ‘determined’ and ‘undetermined’ ideas incorporates an account of semantic indeterminacy: if the complex idea to which a general term is annexed is ‘undetermined’, the term lacks a determinate extension. I propose that a closer look at this account of semantic indeterminacy illuminates various charges of confusion, misuse and abuse of language Locke levels against his philosophical contemporaries.
Aarsleff, H. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. 1981. “‘Do Words Signify Ideas or Things?’ The Scholastic Sources of Locke’s Theory of Language”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19, 299–326.10.1353/hph.2008.0250Search in Google Scholar
–. 1984. “Locke on Language”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, 45–73.10.1080/00455091.1984.10716368Search in Google Scholar
Ayers, M. 1991. Locke. London.10.4324/9780203870259Search in Google Scholar
Bolton, M. B. 1976. “Substances, Substrata, and Names of Substances in Locke’s Essay”. The Philosophical Review 85, 488–513.10.2307/2184276Search in Google Scholar
–. 1992. “The Epistemological Status of Ideas: Locke Compared to Arnauld”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9, 409–24.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998 “The Relevance of Locke’s Theory of Ideas to his Doctrine of Nominal Essence and Anti-Essentialist Semantic Theory”. In Locke. Ed. V. Chappell. Oxford, 214–25.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 1994. “Locke’s Philosophy of Language”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Ed. V. Chappell. Cambridge, 115–45.10.1017/CCOL0521383714.006Search in Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding. Ed. P. Remnant/J. Bennett. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139166874.006Search in Google Scholar
Lenz, M. 2010. Lockes Sprachkonzeption. Berlin.10.1515/9783110228281Search in Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1975. An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Search in Google Scholar
–. 1823. The Works of John Locke. London.Search in Google Scholar
Losonsky, M. 2007. “Language, Meaning, and Mind in Locke’s Essay”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. Ed. L. Newman. Cambridge, 286–312.10.1017/CCOL0521834333.011Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2016. “Language and Meaning”. In A Companion to Locke. Ed. M. Stuart. Oxford, 279–95.Search in Google Scholar
Macke, J. L. 1976. Problems from Locke. Oxford.10.1093/0198750366.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Newman, L. 2000. “Locke on the Idea of Substratum”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81, 291–324.10.1111/1468-0114.00107Search in Google Scholar
Ott, W. R. 2004. Locke’s Philosophy of Language. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511487293Search in Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. 2014. Locke. Chichester.10.1002/9781118327685Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. 1999. “Toward ‘Perfect Collections of Properties’: Locke on the Constitution of Substantial Sorts”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29, 551–93.10.1080/00455091.1999.10715991Search in Google Scholar
Stuart, M. 2013. Locke’s Metaphysics. Oxford, 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645114.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Winkler, K. 1989. Berkeley. Oxford.10.5840/idstudies199222378Search in Google Scholar
–. 2016. “Locke on Essence and the Social Construction of Kinds”. In A Companion to Locke. Ed. by M. Stuart. Chichester, 212–35.10.1002/9781118328705.ch11Search in Google Scholar
Wörner, D. 2019. Im Namen der Dinge. John Locke und der Begriff des Wesens. Basel.10.24894/978-3-7965-3938-1Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston