Abstract
Pioneering researchers claim that telepsychiatry presents the possibility of improving both the quality and quantity of patient care for populations in general as well as for those in rural and remote locations. The prevalence of, and literature on telepsychiatry has increased dramatically in the last decade, covering all aspects of research endeavors. However, little can be found on the topic of ethics in telepsychiatry. Using various clinical scenarios we may provide insight into the moral challenge in telepsychiatry—the lack of in-person contact. The difficulty is to articulate what the significance of in-person contact is and further, its meaning in the therapeutic relationship between the patient and the physician. Using the personalist perspective and related philosophical approaches we may sketch an idea of the patient as person, existentially considered as a relational and bodily human being. By applying Brennan’s model for health technology assessment we may evaluate the morally troubling aspect of telepsychiatry—a lack of in-person contact—on this philosophical sketch of the person. This consideration is crucial when developing policies to guide the use of telepsychiatry in order to maintain the quality of care.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brennan, J. 1977. The method of ethical inquiry. In The open-texture of moral concepts, part 2, ed. J.M. Brennan, 88-149. New York: Barnes and Noble Import Division.
Buber, M. 1958. I and Thou. Edinburgh: T. and Clark. 2nd edition. (trans: Smith, Ronald Gregor). New York: Scribners.
Bynum, T., and S. Rogerson. 1996. Global information ethics, special edition. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2): 131–136.
Evans, H. 1993. High tech vs. ‘high touch’: The impact of medical technology on patient care. In Sociomedical perspectives on patient care, ed. J.M. Clair and R.M. Allman, 83–95. Kentucky, MA: University Press of Kentucky.
Frueh, C., S. Deitsch, A. Santos, et al. 2000. Procedural and methodological issues in telepsychiatry research and program development. Psychiatric Services 51 (12): 1522–1527.
Gastmans, C., and J. De Lepeleire. 2009. Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia. Bioethics (in press).
Hauerwas, S. 1983. The peaceable Kingdom. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Hyler, S., and D. Gangure. 2004. Legal and ethical challenges in telepsychiatry. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 10 (4): 272–276.
Hyler, S., S. Gangure, and S. Betchelder. 2005. Can telepsychiatry replace in-person psychiatric assessments? A review and meta-analysis of comparison studies. CNS Spectrums 10: 401–413.
Janssens, L. 1980–1981. Artificial insemination: Ethical considerations. Louvain Studies 8: 3–29.
Kennedy, C., and P. Yellowlees. 2003. The effectiveness of telepsychiatry measured using the Health Nation Outcome Scale and the Mental Health Inventory. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9: 12–16.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, Colin). New York: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1963. The structure of behavior (trans: Fischer, Alden L.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2004. In The visible and the invisible, ed. Thomas Baldwin. London: Routledge.
Miller, E. 2003. The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: Effects on doctor-patient communication. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9: 1–7.
Monnier, J., R. Knapp, and C. Frueh. 2003. Recent advances in telepsychiatry: An updated review. Psychiatric Services 54 (12): 1604–1609.
Norman, S. 2006. The use of telemedicine in psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 13: 771–777.
O’Reilly, R., J. Bishop, K. Maddox, et al. 2007. Is telepsychiatry equivalent to face-to-face psychiatry? Results from a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Psychiatric Services 58 (6): 836–843.
Pamela, W., and M. Mackert. 2005. Addressing telehealth’s toremost barrier: Provider as initial gatekeeper. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Healthcare 21 (4): 517–521.
Pellegrino, E. 1985. The caring ethic. The relation of physician to patient. In Caring, curing, coping. Nurse, physician, patient relationships, ed. A. Bishop and J. Scudder, 8–30. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Ruskin, R., M. Silver-Aylaian, M. Kling, et al. 2004. Treatment outcomes in depression: Comparison of remote treatment through telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry 161: 1471–1476.
Schotsmans, P. 1988. Responsible involvement and conscientious freedom. A relational approach to medical ethics. In Personalist morals. Essays in honor of professor Louis Janssens, ed. J. Selling, 167–184. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Schotsmans, P. 1998. Ownership of the body. A personalist perspective. In Ownership of the human body. Philosophical considerations on the use of the human body and its parts in healthcare, ed. H. ten Have and J. Welie, 159–172. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schotsmans, P. 1999. Personalism in medical ethics. Ethical Perspectives 6 (1): 10–19.
Selling, J. ed. 1988. Personalist morals. Essays in honor of professor Louis Janssens. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Selling, J. 1998. The human person. In Christian ethics. An introduction, ed. B. Hoose, 95–109. London: Cassell.
Shore, J., D. Hilty, and P. Yelloless. 2007. Emergency management guidelines for telepsychiatry. General Hospital Psychiatry 29: 199–206.
Simpson, J., S. Doze, D. Urness, et al. 2001. Evaluation of a routine telepsychiatry service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 7: 90–98.
Singh, S., and R. Wachter. 2008. Perspectives on medical outsourcing and telemedicine: Rough edges in a flat world? New England Journal of Medicine 358 (15): 1622–1627.
Singh, S., D. Arya, and T. Peters. 2007. Accuracy of telepsychiatric assessment of new routine outpatient referrals. BMC Psychiatry 7: 55–68.
Tang, S., and D. Helmeste. 2000. Digital psychiatry. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 54: 1–10.
van Wynsberghe, A., and C. Gastmans. 2008. Telesurgery: An ethical appraisal. Journal of Medical Ethics 34: e22.
Vanlaere, L., and C. Gastmans. 2007. A normative approach to care ethics: The contribution of the Louvain tradition of personalism. In New pathways for European bioethics, ed. C. Gastmans, K. Dierickx, H. Nys, and P. Schotsmans, 99–118. Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia.
Zaylor, C. 1999. Clinical outcomes in telepsychiatry. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 5 (1): 59–60.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Jeffery Willet for his insight.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Wynsberghe, A., Gastmans, C. Telepsychiatry and the meaning of in-person contact: a preliminary ethical appraisal. Med Health Care and Philos 12, 469–476 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9214-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9214-y