Skip to main content
Log in

Definitions, consistent and inconsistent

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Gupta, A. (1982) “Truth and Paradox,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. & N. Belnap (1993)The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1975) “Outline of a Theory of Truth,”Journal of Philosophy 27, 690–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, H. (1967)Principles of Reasoning: Introduction to Logic, Methodology, and the Theory of Signs, London, Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, S. (1985) “Truth and Reflection,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, 297–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, S. (1993) “Hop, Skip and Jump: The Agonistic Conception of Truth,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives 7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was written in a rush, so please forgive the occasional goof-up. Thanks to Marian David, James Joyce, Ruth Millikan, Leon Porter, Peter Railton, Gideon Rosen, and especially Sally Haslanger for help and advice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yablo, S. Definitions, consistent and inconsistent. Philos Stud 72, 147–175 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989672

Navigation