Public Service Media and Diversity in the Digital Media Landscape: Opportunities and Limitations for Social Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v18i1.4097Keywords:
public service media, diversity, digital media, recommendation systems, algorithms, participatory cultureAbstract
This essay reviews the place and role of Public Service Media (PSM) in promoting social justice in the changing digital media landscape through the ethos of diversity. Media diversity – the value and practice of including varied viewpoints, social groups, voices, and channels or outlets in media – has long been a declared pillar of PSM organizations worldwide. However, current changes in the digital media landscape and the growing extension of PSM organizations to digital platforms require re-reading the premise of promoting media diversity as a tool for social justice. This essay identifies a paradox. On one hand, online media appear to accommodate a greater range of diverse voices and players, particularly in the PSM ecosystem. At the same time, these very same online spaces jeopardize diversity, as the increasing practices of personalization, algorithmic curation, and platformization often reduce diversity of representations, voices, and exposure to content, thereby hindering opportunities for social justice and equality. This essay shines a spotlight on this nexus of conflicting mechanisms.
The essay begins with in-depth definitions of the two somewhat convoluted terms diversity and social justice. This section includes a review of global perspectives on PSM organizations, and the long-standing value of diversity promoted through them for decades. We then review the impact and changes identified in PSM platforms worldwide in light of the digital turn in the media field. This is followed by an in-depth discussion of the inherent tension between mechanisms that promote and hinder diversity online. Throughout this discussion, we raise questions about the practical dimensions of using online media to promote social justice through diversity. It provides a useful starting point for considering the intersection of Public Service Media, online platforms, diversity, and social justice. Thus, the essay will serve academic scholars studying social justice on a conceptual level as well as practitioners and stakeholders in the media industry at large, and PSM in particular, seeking to practically promote social justice.
References
Allison, M. T. (2000). Leisure, diversity and social justice. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949876
Aslama, M. (2010). Rethinking PSM audiences: Diversity of participation for strategic considerations. In G. F. Lowe (Ed.), The public in public service media (pp. 87-100). Nordicom.
Aslama-Horowitz, M. (2015). Public service media and challenge of crossing borders: Assessing new models. Media Studies, 6(12), 80-91.
Baldini, T. B., Túñez-López, M., & Barrientos Báez, A. (2021). Public service media in the age of platformization of culture and society. In M. Túñez-López, F. Campos-Freire & M. Rodríguez-Castro (Eds.), The values of public service media in the internet society (pp. 45-58). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bardoel, J., & d'Haenens, L. (2008). Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, promises and problems. Media, culture & society, 30(3), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708088791
Bardoel, J., & Lowe, G. F. (2007). From public service broadcasting to public service media: The core challenge. In G. F. Lowe & J. Bardoel (Eds.), From public service broadcasting to public service media (pp. 9-26). Nordicom.
Bernal, V. (2010). Diasporas and cyberspace. In K. Knott & S. McLoughlin (Eds.), Diasporas: Concepts, intersections, identities (pp. 167–171). Zed Books.
Cadiz, M. C. H. (2005). Communication for empowerment: The practice of participatory communication. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media and glocal change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 145-158). Publicaciones Cooperativas.
Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. (2022). Study on media plurality and diversity online. https://cmpf.eui.eu/media-pluralism-online-project/
Debrett, M. (2009). Riding the wave: Public service television in the multi-platform era. Media, Culture & Society, 31(5), 807-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709339466
Dorot, R. (2020). Media influence matrix: Israel. CEU Center for Media, Data and Society. https://cmds.ceu.edu/sites/cmcs.ceu.hu/files/attachment/basicpage/1860/mimisraelfunding.pdf
Dwyer, C. (2014). Thinking outside the box: public service broadcasting, participatory media and local community networks in regional Australia [Master’s thesis, University of Technology Sydney]. OPUS.
Dylko, I. B. (2016). How technology encourages political selective exposure. Communication Theory, 26(4), 389-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12089
Embarak, F., Ismail, N. A., & Othman, S. (2021). A systematic literature review: The role of assistive technology in supporting elderly social interaction with their online community. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(7), 7427-7440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02420-1
Enli, G. S., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2011). “Dancing with the audience:” Administrating vote-ins in public and commercial broadcasting. Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412299
European Broadcasting Union. (2012). Editorial principles and guidelines. https://www.ebu.ch/publications/strategic/login_only/guide/public-service-values-editorial-principles
European Broadcasting Union. (2021). Diversity and public service media. https://www.ebu.ch/publications/research/membersonly/report/diversity-and-public-service-media
Fuchs, C., & Unterberger, K. (Eds.). (2021). Public Service Media and Public Service Internet Manifesto. University of Westminster Press.
Griffen-Foley, B. (2004). From tit-bits to big brother: A century of audience participation in the media. Media, Culture & Society, 26(4), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704044216
Hadley, B. (2016). Cheats, charity cases and inspirations: Disrupting the circulation of disability-basedmemes online. Disability & Society, 31(5), 676–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1199378
Helberger, N. (2015). Merely facilitating or actively stimulating diverse media choices? Public service media at the crossroad. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1324-1340.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU Press.
Just, N., Büchi, M., & Latzer, M. (2017). A blind spot in public broadcasters’ discovery of the public: How the public values public service. International Journal of Communication, 11, 992-1011.
Kant, T. (2014). Giving the “viewser” a voice? Situating the individual in relation to personalization, narrowcasting, and public service broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.935851
Keinonen, H., & Klein-Shagrir, O. (2017). From public service broadcasting to soci(et)al TV: Producers’ perceptions of interactivity and audience participation in Finland and Israel. Nordicom Review, 38(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0037
Klein-Shagrir, O. (2017). Para-interactivity and the appeal of television in the digital age. Rowman & Littlefield.
Klein-Shagrir, O. (2019). Digital first! Reinventing Israeli PSB and manufacturing legitimacy online. View, 8(16), 74-87. http://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2019.jethc176
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Westerwick, A., & Sude, D. (2020). Media choice and selective exposure. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th Ed.) (pp. 146-162). Routledge.
Loecherbach, F., Moeller, J., Trilling, D., & van Atteveldt, W. (2020). The unified framework of media diversity: A systematic literature review. Digital Journalism, 8(5), 605-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1764374
Low, B., Brushwood Rose, C., Salvio, P., & Palacios, L. (2012). (Re)framing the scholarship on participatory video: From celebration to critical engagement. In E. J. Milne, C. Mitchell & N. de Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 49-64). AltaMira Press.
Martin, E. N. (2021). Can public service broadcasting survive Silicon Valley? Synthesizing leadership perspectives at the BBC, PBS, NPR, CPB and local US stations. Technology in Society, 64, 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101451
Mazzoli, E. M. (2020). Online content governance: Towards a framework for analysis for prominence and discoverability. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11(3), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00027_1
McLeod, J. M., & Pan, Z. (2005). Concept explication and theory construction. In S. Dunwoody, L. Becker, D. McLeod & G. Kosicki (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod (pp. 13–76). Hampton Press.
McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest (Vol. 144). Sage Publishing.
McQuail, D. (2007). Revisiting diversity as a media policy goal. In W.A. Meier & J. Trappel (Eds.), Power, performance and politics (pp. 41-58). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Meneses, J., & Mominó, J. M. (2010). Putting digital literacy in practice: How schools contribute to digital inclusion in the network society. The Information Society, 26(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972241003712231
Moe, H. (2013). Public service broadcasting and social networking sites: The Norwegian broadcasting corporation on Facebook. Media International Australia, 146(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1314600115
Munson, S., Zhou, D., & Resnick, P. (2009). Sidelines: An algorithm for increasing diversity in news and opinion aggregators. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13950
Napoli, P. M. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Pearson, C., & Trevisan, F. (2015). Disability activism in the new media ecology: Campaigning strategies in the digital era. Disability & Society, 30(6), 924–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1051516
Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital diasporas: Postcoloniality, media and affect. Interventions, 22(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1718537
Rogers, M. (2017). Participatory filmmaking pedagogies in schools: Tensions between critical representation and perpetuating gendered and heterosexist discourses. Studies in Social Justice, 11(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v11i2.1522
Scanlan, M. (2022). Reassessing the disability divide: Unequal access as the world is pushed online. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(3), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00803-5
Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2015). “Seek the meek, seek the just:” Social media and social justice. Telecommunications policy, 39(9), 796-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.002
Sehl, A., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Developing digital news in public service media. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2005). Participatory communication: The new paradigm. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte (Eds.), Media & glocal change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 91–103). CLACSO.
Sørensen, J. K., & Hutchinson, J. (2018). Algorithms and public service media. In G. F. Lowe, H. van den Bulck & K. Donders (Eds.), Public service media in the networked society: RIPE@ 2017 (pp. 91-106). Nordicom.
Stavitsky, A., & Huntsberger, M. (2010). “With the support from listeners like you:” Lessons from U.S. public radio. In G. F. Lowe (Ed.), The public in public service media (pp. 257-271). Nordicom.
Stollfuß, S. (2019). German public television, social media and audience engagement. View, 8(16), 98-109. http://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2019.jethc178
Thurman, N., & Fletcher, R. (2020). Effects of a magazine’s move to online-only: Post-print audience attention and readership retention revisited. Journalism Practice, 14(10), 1225-1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1685903
Van den Bulck, H., & Moe, H. (2018). Public service media, universality and personalisation through algorithms: Mapping strategies and exploring dilemmas. Media, Culture & Society, 40(6), 875-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734407
Van der Wurff, R. (2004). Supplying and viewing diversity: The role of competition and viewer choice in Dutch broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104042911
van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2015). Making public television social? Public service broadcasting and the challenges of social media. Television & New Media, 16(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414527136
van Es, K. F. (2017). An impending crisis of imagination: Data driven personalization in public service broadcasters. Media@LSE Working Paper Series, (43), 1-18.
van Es, K. F., & Poell, T. (2020). Platform imaginaries and Dutch public service media. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120933289
Vanhaeght, A-S. (2019). Audience participation in PSM from a media-centric to a society-centric approach: The monitor as a best practice of the Dutch public broadcaster NPO. View, 8(16), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2019.jethc174
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (1999). Ensuring richness and diversity of representation in the public
sphere: Mass media as forums for democratic debate. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 27, 24-52.
Williams, A. (2017). Fat people of color: Emergent intersectional discourse online. Social Sciences, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010015
Yadlin-Segal, A. (2019). What’s in a smile? Politicizing disability through selfies and affect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aya Yadlin, Oranit Klein-Shagrir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
