Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the conceptualisation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the context of mining multinationals (MNCs) in Argentina. It explores the suitability of CSR for addressing social, environmental and economic issues associated with mining in the country. The study is based on interviews with four stakeholder groups in the country: government, civil society, international financial organisations, and mining industry. These are analysed using content and interpretative techniques and supplemented by the content analysis of secondary data from headquarters of mining MNCs. Using the concept of corporate social responsibility orientation (CSRO), the study contrasts the perceptions of major stakeholders and examines adaptation of mining companies’ CSRO to local context. It reveals that the CSRO of mining managers in Argentina differs from CSRO developed by global headquarters; and in Argentina companies “negotiate” economic, environmental and legal dimensions of CSR with the government. Although companies “negotiate” philanthropic responsibilities with the communities, ethical responsibilities are defined by the headquarters and not negotiated locally. The analysis suggests that environmental duties are the critical element of CSR in the mining sector in Argentina. This study treats environment as a separate dimension of corporate responsibility defined as to do “what is safe for the environment”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Schwartz and Carroll (2003) gave a ‘sustainability make-over’ to the four-part categorisation of CSR by eliminating philanthropic responsibilities (which is subsumed by economic and ethical domains) and conceptually substituting the principle of emphasis for a principle of balance between the overlapping domains, as expressed by a Venn diagram. It indicates that none of the three CSR domains is more important or significant relative to the others. While there is no denying the utility of this new construct, particularly with regards to teaching and research (Schwartz and Carroll 2003), we argue that the underlying assumption that these three components are wholly in harmony with each other and should be always weighted equally is overly idealistic in developing countries, given the complex and multi-faceted nature of companies’ responsibilities in environments where institutional governance is required (Blowfield and Murray, 2008). Indeed, Carroll and Shabana (2010) went back to Carroll’s original four-part definition of CSR.

  2. Only three large-scale gold projects reached the stage of exploitation.

References

  • Acar, W., Aupperle, K. E., & Lowy, R. M. (2001). An empirical exploration of measures of social responsibility across the spectrum of organisational types. International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 9, 26–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelstein, R. (2010). Firms as social actors. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(3), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelidis, J. P., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2002). Practical implications of educational background on future corporate executives’ social responsibility orientation. Teaching Business Ethics, 6, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hartfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R., & Misovich, S. (1993). An integration of Gibsonian and Vygotskian perspectives on changing attitudes in Group context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N., & Wheeler, D. (1992) Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the pollution havens?’ In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment. World Bank discussion paper 159 (pp. 159–167). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Reinventing the meaning of development? International Affairs, 81(3), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A critical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccardi, F., Giovannini, S., Orellana, M., & Rocchiete, D. (2008). El sueño minero: un análisis de la narrativa utópica del desarrollo. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 1(1), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., Farh, J.-L., & Hegarty, W. H. (2000). A cross-cultural comparison of corporate social responsibility orientation: Hong Kong vs. United States students. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Goldsby, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility orientation, goals, and behavior: A study of small business owners. Business & Society, 48(1), 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Hegarty, W. H. (1999). Some determinants of student corporate social responsibility orientation. Business and Society, 38(2), 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitial construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholz, A. K. (1999). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (4th ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comelli, M., Hadad, M. G., & Petz, M. I. (2010). Hacia Un Desarrollo (In)Sostenible En América Latina. El Caso De La Minería A Cielo Abierto En La Argentina. Argumentos. Revista de crítica social, 12, octubre 2010.

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (Eds.). (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporation Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (2000). What improves environmental performance: Evidence from the Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., & Meisner, C. (2001). Environmental news in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and the Philippines. Local Environment, 5, 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debeljuh, P. (2006). Clima Ético En Las Empresas De La Argentina: Grado De Implementación De Prácticas Éticas. Trabajo presentado para el Congreso Interna cional Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, Universidad y Desarrollo. Buenos Aires, 4, 5 y 6 de septiembre de 2006.

  • Duarte, F. (2010). Working with corporate social responsibility in Brazilian companies: The role of managers values in the maintenance of CSR cultures. Journal of Business Ethics 96:355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, 14, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. S., & Jimenez, E. (1992). Policy instruments for pollution control in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 7(2), 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eweje, G. (2006). The role of MNCs in community development initiatives in developing countries: corporate social responsibility at work in Nigeria and South Africa. Business and Society, 45(2), 93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Velamuri S. R., Moriarty B. (2006). Company stakeholder responsibility: A new approach to CSR. Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics. Accessed March 1, 2011 from http://www.darden.virginia.edu/corporate-ethics/pdf/csr.pdf.

  • Frynas, J. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galafassi, G., & Dimitriu, A. (2007). El Plan “B” de los Capitales Mineros. A propósito de las notas sobreInversiones mineras en Argentinaen Le Monde, Diplomatique de mayo 2007.

  • Gorrochategui, N. (2010). Crisis y Responsabilidad Social Empresaria (RSE). Agenda internacional y perspectivas de evolución para la Argentina. Impactos de la Crisis Financiera Internacional en la Argentina, 2, 139–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grynspan, R., & Kliksberg, B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in Latin America: Not a waste of time or money. Foreign Policy, July/August, pp. 167–169.

  • Guidi, M. (2008). Rethinking corporate social responsibility: A case study in argentina from the point of view of the civil society. Nómadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas 19 (3). Accessed April 4, 2011 from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/pdf/181/18101919.pdf.

  • Guidi, M., Hillier, J., & Tarbert, H. (2008). Maximizing the firm’s value to society through ethical business decisions: Incorporating “moral debt” claims. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(4), 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. A., Thornton, D., & Kagan, R. A. (2005). Motivating management: Corporate compliance in environmental protection. Law and Policy, 27(2), 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R., Sinha, P., Kapfudzaruwa, F., & Schild, C. (2009). Business and human rights in South Africa: An analysis of antecedents of human rights due diligence. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Suppl 2), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, P. A. (2004). The corporate social responsibility system in Latin America and the Caribbean. FOCAL policy papers, FPP-04-1, March. http://www.focal.ca/pdf/csr_04.pdf.

  • Hilson, G., & Murck, B. (2000). Sustainable development in the mining industry: Clarifying the corporate perspective. Resources Policy, 26, 227–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, K. (2003). Fading green? Environmental politics in the Mercosur free trade agreement. Latin American Politics and Society, 45(4), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. A. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are There differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idahosa, P. (2002). Business ethics and development in conflict (Zones): The case of Talisman oil. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbun, B. (2007). Cannot manage without the “significant other”: Mining, corporate social responsibility and local communities in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irigoyen, M. (2010). Argentina. In A. Visser & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), The world guide to CSR: A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility (pp. 60–66). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ite, U. E. (2004). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in developing countries: A case study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ite, U. E. (2005). Poverty reduction in resource-rich developing countries: what have multinational corporations got to do with it? Journal of International Development, 17, 913–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapelus, P. (2002). Mining, corporate social responsibility and the “community”: The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC, responses and code development. European Management Journal, 23(2), 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. C. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, D. McWilliams, J. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, T. (2002). The psychology of environmentally sustainable behaviour: Fitting together the pieces of the puzzle. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., & Córdoba, J. R. (2010). Editorial: Corporate social responsibility in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J., Kurucz, E. C., & Colbert, B. (2010). Conceptions of the business, society, nature interface: Implications for business and society scholarship. Business & Society, 49(3), 402–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marz, J. W., Powers, T. L., & Queisser, T. (2003). Corporate and individual influences on managers’ social orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principles of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, A. (2007). Rocks and hard places. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutti, D. I., Nava-Fischer, E., Yakovleva, N., Vazquez, D., & Di Marco, M. H. (2008). La Industria Minera Y Los Conflictos Ambientales - Sociales: Revisión Y Análysis Desde Una Perspectiva Global. Asociación Argentina de Geólogos Economistas. Asociación Argentina de Geólogos Economistas, Publicación Especial, 2, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., & Muro, A. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Argentina: The evolution of an agenda. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H. M., Saunders, C. B., & McCarthy, A. D. (1989). Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C. (1987). The attitudes of United States and South African managers to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R. (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peinado-Vara, E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkston, T. S., & Carroll, A. B. (1996). A retrospective examination of CSR orientations: Have they changed? Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L., & Fintel, E. D. (2002). Environmental management as an indicator of business responsibility in Central America. In P. Utting (Ed.), The greening of business in developing countries: Rhetoric, reality and prospects (pp. 41–57). London: Zed Books (in association with UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., & Gardetti, M. A. (2006). Analysing changes to prioritise corporate citizenship. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2009). ‘Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics, 88(Supplement 1), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramiro, P., & Gonzalez, E. (2008). Las Iniciativas De Resistencia Frente A Las Empresas Multinacionales. Viento Sur, 95, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Camino, J. (2007). Re-evaluating green marketing strategy: A stakeholder perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 11(12), 1328–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roitstein, F. (2004). La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial En Argentina: Tendencias Y Oportunidades. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 32, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiaffini, H. (2004). La Inserción De La Inversión En Minería En Las Tendencias Socio-Economicas De La Argentina. Revista Theomai, 10, 10–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (2006). A view of corporate citizenship in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (1998). Research on corporate social responsibility orientation: A critique and future directions. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, Kona, HI.

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. M. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberhorn, D., & Warren, R. C. (2007). Defining corporate social responsibility: A view from big companies in Germany and the UK. European Business Review, 19(5), 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svampa, M. (2008). Una Cartografia De Las Resistencias (2003–2008) Entre Las Luchas Por La Inclusión Y Las Discusiones Sobre El Modelo De Desarrollo. Revista Osal 16, 2–30. Accessed April 4, 2011, from http://www.maristellasvampa.net/archivos/ensayo42.pdf.

  • Svampa, M., & Alvarez, M. S. (2010). Modelo Minero, Resistencias Sociales Y Estilos De Desarrollo: Los Marcos De La Discusión En Argentina. Ecuador Debate 79, 105–126. Accessed April 4, 2011, from http://www.flacsoandes.org/dspace/handle/10469/2254.

  • Swedish Trade Council in Argentina (2006). The mining and mining equipment. Accessed March 29, 2010, from http://www.swedishtrade.se/.

  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks: New Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (2010). Environmental management intentions: An empirical investigation of Argentina’s polluting firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1111–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Brust, D., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Natenzon, C., & Burgos-Jiménez, J. (2009). The challenges of businesses intervention in areas with high poverty and environmental deterioration: Promoting an integrated stakeholders approach in management education. In C. Wankel & J. Stoner (Eds.), Management education for global sustainability (pp. 175–206). New York: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2007). Revisiting Carroll’s CSR pyramid: An African perspective. In A. Crane & D. Matten (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Three volume set (pp. 195–212). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In A. Crane, D. McWilliams, J. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 473–479). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, A., & Tolhurst, N. (Eds.). (2010). The world guide to CSR: A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, A. (2006). Social and Environmental responsibility in small and medium enterprises in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenberg, A. (2006). La Narrativa De La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial. Cuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración, 80, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2003). Responding to the leadership challenge: Findings of a CEO survey on global corporate citizenship. Geneva: World Economic Forum (WEF).

  • Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • www.noalamina.org. El Saqueo Al Pais- 19 Razones Para Decir NO A La Mina: Incentivos Fiscales A La Minería En Argentina. Accessed December 21, 2010, from http://www.noalamina.org/index.php?module=announce&ANN_id=3&ANN_user_op+view.

  • Yakovleva, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zicari, A. (2006). Responsabilidad Social Empresaria: Del Dicho Al Hecho. Poniéndole Números A La Responsabilidad Social. Invenio, 9(17), 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper is based on data collected in the context of international collaboration between Cardiff University and the University of Buenos Aires. The authors would like to thank Professor Diana Mutti from the University of Buenos Aires for her input during the research for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Yakovleva.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix I: CSR by Carroll and Visser

See Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6 Description of the types of corporate responsibilities by Carroll and Visser
Table 7 Keywords for four components of CSR: Carroll and Visser

Appendix II: Components of CSR in the Argentine mining sector

See Table 8.

Table 8 Components of CSR in the Argentine mining sector

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakovleva, N., Vazquez-Brust, D. Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina. J Bus Ethics 106, 191–211 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0989-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0989-4

Keywords

Navigation