The purpose of this study is to clarify the role of structure moments of philosophy of education and philosophy of physical education by comparing with John S Brubacher, Hiroshi Inoue and Earle. F. Zeigler who used similar method.
The findings are follows;
1) Inoue and Zeigler are influenced by Brubacher to analyze the structure of philosophy of education.
2) Zeigler classifies educational philosophy by Brubacher's influence and Inoue does it by Brameld's influence.
3) They both place general philosophical viewpoint as substructure of educational philosophy and place viewpoints of education and physical education.
4) They also explain each of philosophy of education and philosophy of physical education which are classified, by using the structure moments.
5) To explain by using the structure moments is effective and easy to understand for us.