Skip to main content
Log in

Shen Dao’s Own Voice in the Shenzi Fragments

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shen Dao 慎到 is known as one of the Legalists who influenced Han Feizi 韓非子 in terms of the concept of shi 勢 (circumstantial advantage, power, or authority). This argument is based on the “A Critique of Circumstantial Advantage (Nanshi 難勢)” chapter of the Hanfeizi, where Han Feizi advances his own idea of shi after criticizing both Shen Dao and an anonymous Confucian. However, there are other primary sources to contain Shen Dao’s thought, namely, seven incomplete Shenzi 慎子 chapters of the Essentials on Government from the Assemblage of Books (Qunshu zhi yao 群書治要) and other fragments preserved in other Chinese texts. This article examines the Shenzi fragments in order to ask whether Shen Dao stresses the concept of shi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger. 1994. The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1979. The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano, Yūichi 淺野裕一. 1992. The Formation and Development of the Way of Huang-Lao 黃老道の成立と展開. Tōkyō. 東京: Sōbunsha. 創文社.

  • Barret, T.H. 1980. “On the Transmission of the S hen Tzu and of the Yang-sheng Yao-chi.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2: 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1993. Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Tr. by Daniela Gobetti. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Cai, Rukun 蔡汝堃. 1940. Shenzi with Collected Discourses 愼子集說. Changsha 長沙:   Shangwu 商務.

  • Ciao, Gongquan (Hsiao Kung-chuan) 蕭公權. 1978. A History of Chinese Political Thought. Tr. by F.W. Mote. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

  • Creel, H.G. 1974. S hen Pu-hai. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, Claire, ed. 2005. Hobbes on Law. Aldershot, Hants, England and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

  • Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Friedman, R. B. 1990. “On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy.” In Authority. Edited by Joseph Raz. New York: New York University Press.

  • Friedrich, Carl J. and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski. 1965. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Yu-lan (Feng Youlan). 1952. A History of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 1. Tr. by Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gao, Yinxiu 高銀秀 and Zhang Zhihua 張志華. 1988. “A Brief Discussion of Shen Dao’s Thought of Rule of Law 慎到法治思想簡論.”Jinyang Xuekan 晉陽學刊 6: 88–93.

  • Goldin, Paul R. 1999. Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago, Ill.: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.G. 1989. Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Jean. 1988. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Ronghai 江榮海. 1989. “Shen Dao Must Be a Huang-Lao Thinker 慎到應是黃老思想家.” Beijing Daxue Xuebao 北京大學學報 1: 110–116.

  • Jullien, François. 1995. The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D.C. and Roger T. Ames. 2003. S UN Bin: The Art of Warfare: A Translation of the Classic Chinese Work of Philosophy and Strategy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Janghee. 2005. Xunzi and Early Chinese Naturalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Qichao 梁啟超. 1969. History of Chinese Political Thought. Tr. by L.T. Chen. New York: AMS Press.

  • Liao, Mingchun 廖名春. 2007. “On the Surviving Text ‘Cao Mo’s Battle Formation and Shenzi’ in the Chu Bamboo Scripts 楚竹書《曹沫之陳》與《慎子》佚文.” In The Reconsideration of Newly Excavated Documents and Pre-Qin Thought 新出土文獻與先秦思想重構. Edited by Lin Qingzhang 林慶彰 and Li Xueqin 李學勤. Taibei 臺北: Taiwan Guji 臺灣古籍.

  • Liu, Bin 劉斌. 1998. “A Brief Discussion of Shen Dao’s Thought of Rule of Law 慎子法治思想概述.” Guanzi Xuekan 管子學刊 1: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, Michael, ed. 1993. Early Chinese Texts: A Biblical Guide. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Ruirong 盧瑞容. 2004. Discussion of the Ideas of Relative Relationship in Ancient China: Analysis of the Origin of Notions on Strategic Advantage, Harmony, Weighting and Flexion 中國古代「相對關係」思維探討: 「勢」「和」「權」「屈曲」槪念溯源分析. Taibei 臺北:   Shangding Wenhua Chubanshe 商鼎文化出版社.

  • Lundahl, Bertil. 1992. H an Fei Zi: The Man and the Work. Stockholm: Institute of Oriental Languages, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Duxiu 羅獨修. 2002. Study of the Subtleties of the Ideas of Rule by Strategic Advantage in Pre-Qin Period 先秦勢治思想探微. Taibei 臺北:   Zhongguo Wenhua Daxue Chubanbu 中國文化大學出版部.

  • Mawangdui Hanmu Boshu, Vol.l. 1980. Beijing 北京: Wenwuchubanshe 文物出版社.

  • Murphy, James B. 2005. The Philosophy of Positive Law: Foundations of Jurisprudence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Coleman, Jules L. 1990. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Jurisprudence. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Mark C. 1995. “Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist?” Ethics 105: 846–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peerenboom, R.P. 1993. Law and Morality in Ancient China: The Silk Manuscripts of Huang-Lao. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines,Yuri. 2002. “Lexical Changes in Zhanguo Texts.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122.4: 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph. 1985. “Authority, Law and Morality.” The Monist 68.3:295–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Benjamin. 1984. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Paul. M. 1979. The S hen Tzu Fragments. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vankeerberghen, Griet. 2005–2006. “Choosing Balance: Weighing (Quan 權) as a Metaphor for Action in Early Chinese texts.” Early China 30: 47–89.

  • Wang, Xianqian 王先謙 (1842–1918). 1988. Xunzi: With Collected Interpretations 荀子集解. Ed. by Shen Xiaohuan 沈嘯寰 and Wang Xingxian 王星賢. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua shuju 中華書局.

  • Wolff, Robert Paul. 1998. In Defense of Anarchism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soon-ja Yang.

Additional information

*This paper is a revision of part of my PH.D dissertation, submitted to the Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations at the University of Pennsylvania, 2010. I am deeply indebted to my dissertation committee: Paul R. Goldin, Victor H. Mair, Yuri Pines, and the anonymous reviewers of DAO for their thoughtful remarks and insightful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Sj. Shen Dao’s Own Voice in the Shenzi Fragments. Dao 10, 187–207 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9212-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9212-7

Keywords

Navigation