Biomemetics

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
4 min readApr 21, 2021

--

The meme is a tokenization of Nature.

Photo by Clay Banks on Unsplash

The meme is a tokenization of Nature. Explaining (and exposing) biomemetics (as a neologism for ‘self’).

The Explanation for Self

The conservation of a circle gives us the reasonable explanation for a ‘self.’

Self (Conservation of a Circle)

So, thus, the conservation of a circle gives us, also, the reasonable explanation for a ‘meme.’

Meme (Conservation of a Circle)

This means biomimetics is an ‘other’ word for biomemetics (and, thus, biomemetrics). Where biomemetics is a ‘self‘ ’engaged with at-most, and, at-least, one other self.’

Biomemetics (Biomimetics)
Self and Other Self

The Super(im)position of One

That is, the notion of ‘self’ is an ‘other’ word for the notion of ‘one.’ Where ‘one’ (and ‘self’) is associated with at-least, and at-most, one other one (one other self).

The notion of one, then, is, superimposed on the notion of two. (The numbers one and two.)

One
Two

Which is possible because it is impossible to have a half without a whole (a diameter without a circumference).

The Explanation for ‘Data’

This produces information and data, and, also, the analysis of information and data.

Because zero and one is, technically, one and two. Again, circumference and diameter of an always-conserved circle.

Zero

This produces, what humans experience as, life and death. Life and death in all disciplines and systems (the notion (and the true value) of ‘zero’ is, technically, a circle).

The Need for (The Use Case Of) Redundancy (and Confusion)

Therefore, Nature uses redundancy and confusion (superposition) (superimposition) to protect its ‘self.’

Superposition

That is, Conservation of the Circle tokenizes Nature, which explains, what humans label (and experience) as ‘data’ (information).

When, technically, or, more basically, all of the above (all of the letters, words, sentences, ideas in this article, and in all articles) are abstractions (tokenizations) for a circle (the diagram).

Unfortunately (or Fortunately) (Depending on Your Point of View)

Meaning the diagram is the only way to understand (tokenize) (abstract) Nature. Where the diagram is two circles in a circle (nothing more or less) and this is, always, abstract (not present, not visible) (not real).

Tokenization

However, it is, also, half-the-time, present-visible-real (one circle in a circle). (Or else we could not create, or observe, the diagram.) (Repurposing, and resolving, the argument between Einstein and Bohr about what is, and-or isn’t, real.)

Again, this is because you cannot have a half without a whole. So this creates, and allows for, two or more (two or less) ‘points of view’ (abstractions).

Meaning you can have any number of abstractions, including zero abstractions.

It’s All About Pi

It’s completely ‘Up to You.’ (Proving ‘Pi’ is the correct ‘term’ for (what humans label) ‘mind.’) (Pi is the correct ‘term’ for everything.)

Pi

Which is why some people believe in the meme and some people don’t. Why some people will always believe the opposite of whatever is presented.

Getting them into, and out of, trouble (consistently), explaining (the need for) (and the use of) ‘magical thinking.’ (Explaining all defense (and escape) mechanisms.)

Reality

Conservation of the Circle is, technically, the only dynamic in Nature. Giving us biomimetics, and, also, then, biomemetics (and, by extension), biomemetrics. (Meaning you can think and-or believe whatever you want to think and-or believe, and, because of the diagram, it will always be ‘true.’) Otherwise, financial markets (memes in all disciplines) could not operate.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0923C6PSK/

Continue with: Biomimetics (Biomimicry) (Biomemetics) | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Apr, 2021 | Medium

--

--