The History of ‘Ideas’
Starting with the ‘pyramid…’
If we want to be one hundred percent ‘accurate’ about the ‘history’ of ‘ideas,’ we have to start with the pyramids. 6000 years ago, or thereabouts, and, probably, if truth be told, much earlier than that.
That is, the pyramid articulates the conservation of a circle, since the ‘builders’ used the principle of ‘similarity’ in mathematics in order to construct them.
So, we have to start with ‘similarity,’ in order to understand ‘difference,’ which is the base requirement for an ‘idea.’
That is, zero and one (modern) is yin and yang (ancient) which provides the basis for similarity, where complementarity is required for identity (the identification of an idea) (difference, in general).
From here we have to go to ‘representation,’ since, without a representation we cannot have an interpretation, and, again, these both depend on identification, which depends on complementarity (or, more simply, duplication) (duality in general).
So, now we’re back to the beginning of any universe, since the whole idea of ‘universe’ is, also, dependent on duality. Meaning it is impossible to have a zero without a one because it is impossible to have a circumference without a diameter.
Taking us to the core ‘initiative’ called ‘history of ideas.’
Thus, from the ‘common’ point of view, history depends on zero before one, when an idea depends on zero ‘as one.’
This is because you cannot have ‘is’ without ‘is not’ because you cannot have duplication without negation (and, always, vice versa). Taking us back to the pyramid (for our analysis).
That is, the pyramid is based on the triangle, or one-two-three, which is, more correctly, pi-diameter-circumference.
This explains the whole idea of history, the pyramids, the construction of the pyramids, and the mythical message of the pyramids (there is a circular relationship between life and death) (idea and reality).
Meaning the zero cannot occur without the one because a circumference cannot occur without a diameter, and this will upset all of those whose livelihoods depend on ‘zero coming before one.’
However, not to worry. Pi is much smarter than that. Pi doesn’t really care about zero and-or one, circumference and-or diameter, because pi needs both in order to survive, so pi can use both, either, or neither.
Again, we’re back to one-two-three (zero-one-two) (one-zero-one) (zero-one-zero). Three in any combination.
This is brand new ‘thinking.’ Or, a brand new ‘idea,’ which solves the problem of ‘ideas,’ where you cannot have an abstract ‘reality’ without a concrete idea, meaning, technically (and this is very important) the diagram is the concrete idea for an abstraction (idea in general).
Where the concrete abstraction (any NFT) (non-fungible-token) is both a noun and a verb (the diagram is both a noun and a verb) (idea as a noun idea as a verb). Which incorporates (is a superposition of) both representation and interpretation.
Proving we need (to understand) the conservation of a circle if we want to understand, fully, the history (and, thus, the future) of the ‘idea.’ (The biomemetic token.)
Conservation of the Circle is the core dynamic in Nature. Explaining the whole idea of ‘idea.’ Where the idea is, always, an abstraction. Explaining the confusion generated when you attempt to discuss the whole idea of ‘idea.’
