What Modern Physicists are ‘Discovering’

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
4 min readMar 23, 2021

--

The conservation of a circle is the core dynamic in Nature.

Photo by Fran on Unsplash

If you check with modern theoretical physicists, as of late, you will notice the reference to the conservation of a circle in several different ways.

First of all, only one diagram articulates the conservation of a circle, accurately:

Past

From here you can ‘identify’ this diagram in an unlimited number of ways. All of mathematics, for example. The designation of a ‘relative’ frame, for another.

The ‘realization’ that everything is ‘relative’ to everything else.

And, the simple fact that ‘duality’ is the basis for unification and unitization (any mathematical description) in all mathematical functions and operations.

Present

You can notice that post 2007 (post 2002, actually) entanglement, symmetry ‘breaking,’ and ‘superposition’ are being used to ‘rethink’ quantum mechanics, and the whole idea of ‘emergence.’

Where emergence, frame, unitization, unification, duality, relativity, entanglement, symmetry ‘breaking,’ superposition, chaos, complexity, information theory, and quantum dynamics in general (everything in mathematics and physics) articulate, and prove, the conservation of a circle.

Zero and-or One

Nothing more. Nothing less. Independent of the ‘time’ or ‘space’ frame. And, independent of the physicist. Or the ‘reference’ frame.

Meaning, in traditional mathematics, zero does not equal one. While in ‘reality’ zero is, always, equal to one. Proving the conservation of a circle is where (and how) we ‘get’ the zero and the one (circumference and diameter).

Zero is equal to One
Zero is not equal to One

Meaning, all of the representations in Nature articulate both zero and one (the conservation of an uber basic circle). Exposing how a human is able to ‘interpret’ the ‘representation.’ (Pi in mathematics is both interpretation and interpreter (representation and representer) (subject and object).)

Subject and Object
Pi

All physicists (and mathematicians) and, more importantly, philosophers (all people) (biologists, technologists, historians, politicians, economists, financiers, archeologists, psychologists, criminologists, law enforcers, judges, lawyers, scientists in any field, artists in every ‘field,’ everyday people) depend on duality (the conservation of a circle) for survival.

Future

Thus, if you know what you’re looking for, you can find the conservation of a circle in all of the publications (representations) (interpretations) (identifications) (NFT’s, technically) in history.

This is the basis for a new area of study, based on a technological realization (and definition) of ‘’self’: Biomemetics.

Biomemetics is the idea that a ‘self’ in any discipline is, always, a ‘token’ for the conservation of a circle. Explaining technology, and, especially, cryptocurrency (crypto-technology) (including NFT’s, ‘smart’ contracts, de-centralized processing, blockchain in general). Tokenization in general.

Tokenization

For a beautifully written, ‘realistic,’ and ‘honest,’ analysis of ‘where we are in physics,’ see Gerard t’Hooft’s ‘An unorthodox view on quantum mechanics’.

Conservation of a Circle

Otherwise, Conservation of the Circle gives us the motivation for Nature, and a realistic explanation for ‘representation.’ (The basis for the circular-linear relationship between physics and mathematics (any ‘zero’ and-or ‘one.’) (The structure of Nature.)

Amazon.com: Biomemetics: The Tokenization of Reality eBook: Yardley, Ilexa: Kindle Store
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0923C6PSK/
Amazon.com: Euclid’s Error: The Mathematics behind Foucault, Deleuze, and Nietzsche eBook: Yardley, Ilexa: Kindle Store

--

--